|
Loading... Noblesse Oblige: An Enquiry into the Identifiable Characteristics of the…by Nancy Mitford
LibraryThing recommendationsMember recommendationsLoading...
won't like
will probably not like
will probably like
will like
will love Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book. This novel is a collection of essays exploring the distinctions between the "U" (Upper Class) and The "non U". At times I found the "U"'s the be rather self deprecating and in on the joke of their culture and then at other times I thought those interviewed didn't quite get it. It all added to the tongue in cheek humor while imparting a wealth of information and history into English social customs. ( )Originally published in 1956, Noblesse Oblige is a classic (which sparked, out of a teasing and just ever so slightly tongue-in-cheek essay by Nancy Mitford, the original Upperclass/Non-Upperclass usage controversy) is still worth a reread today. Although Nancy Mitford is often cited as the author, the book is actually a collection of essays, poetry and some satire by several different contributors. All aspire on some level to simultaneously illuminate and poke fun at the propensity of humans in general and the British in particular to divide into cliques, classes and every sort of Better Thans. no reviews | add a review
Amazon.com Product Description (ISBN 019860520X, Paperback)The Great U and Non-U Debate Until Nancy Mitford wrote 'The English Aristocracy' in 1955, England was blissfully unconscious of U-Usage and its lethal implications. The phenomenon of 'Upper-Class English Usage' had, it is true, already been remarked upon by Professor Alan Ross who, in an academic paper printed in Helsinki a year earlier, claimed that the upper classes now distinguished solely by their use of language, but it was the Honourable Mrs. Peter Rodd (as she was addressed by U-speaker Evelyn Waugh, Esq.) who first let the cat out of the bag. Her article sparked off a public debate joined vigorously by Evelyn Waugh, 'Strix', and Christopher Sykes, whose counterblasts are collected here. Osbert Lancaster, caricaturist of English manners, takes the debate into the visual dimension, and John Betjeman poeticizes on the theme with characteristic charm: Phone for the fish-knives Norman As Cook is a little unnerved; You kiddies have crumpled the serviettes And I must have things daintily served. A new introduction by Ned Sherrin reveals more of the articles and correspondences that were generated by the debate, in his inimitably entertaining fashion.(retrieved from Amazon Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:58:17 -0400) The first test round has been closed. Visit the Open Shelves Classification group for details. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||