|
|
Loading... The Gentle Art of Lexicography: As Pursued and Experienced by an Addict (1963)| 12 | None | 698,795 |
(4.5) | None |
| Recently added by | kajdis2, rr-k, donbuch1, KayCliff, woolly, moibibliomaniac, AnthonyBurgess, C.S._Lewis, languagemuseum, dictionaryevangelist | | Legacy Libraries | Anthony Burgess, C. S. Lewis |
▾LibraryThing recommendations ▾Will you like it?
Loading...
 Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book. ▾Work-to-work relationships
|
|
| Series (with order) |
|
| Canonical title |
|
| Original title |
|
| Alternative titles |
|
| Original publication date |
|
| People/Characters |
|
| Important places |
|
| Important events |
|
| Related movies |
|
| Awards and honors |
|
| Epigraph |
|
| Dedication |
|
| First words |
|
| Quotations |
For most of us, a dictionary is hardly a book to read; a good dictionary, however, is a book to browse in. Some dictionaries are so well written that one just goes on and on.  My aim has always been to speak a clear and lucid, rather than a dulcet, English and to write a lucid and expressive, rather than an elegant, English; and to be occasionally subtle, never precious.  That, you will agree, affords a notable addition to your Department of Useless Information; as if there were -- as if, indeed, there could be -- such a thing as useless information!  Many scholars not concerned with language, and even many non-lexocographical philologists, if they have not thought of the matter ... are either totally unaware or, at best, very hazily aware, of the fact that there are two main alphabetical systems, with a third -- combining the other two -- employed by those humanitarians who do not wish either to carry logic to an absurdity or, like a house-proud woman, to pursue an ideal of perfection to the point where everyone else is disconforted and discomfited.  I happen to be one of those scholars who think that the reader's convenience should override the lexicographer's virtuosity.  I never use a card-index, a device idolized by those students whose sole merit is method. It is physically clumsy and mentally a constant source of bafflement. That it best serves the needs of a team engaged in a vast project, I readily admit. Only, I'm not a team. I do my own work. No; I use large exercise books, with sufficient spacing between entries, and the left-hand page a blank. If one's planning has been both careful and comprehensive, one has ample room left for additions and modifications: and one can see a considerable area ofwork displayed: the trees do not obscure the view of the wood. Cards serve well enough for singletons. For long complex entries, they are inferior, and for large groups, still more for vast constellations, they are hopeless. Quite apart from all that, one can, in the physical sense, work very much more rapidly with such exercisebooks than with such cards, for the books are so much easier to write in and one can turn forward or back so much more easily and speedily.  | |
|
| Last words |
|
| Disambiguation notice |
|
| Publisher's editors |
|
| Blurbers |
|
| Publisher series |
|
▾References References to this work on external resources. Wikipedia in English
None ▾LibraryThing members' description
| Book description |
In the words of the author, "I could present lexicography in the light of one man's experience of it -- the impact, or, rather, series of impacts upon him -- and the difficulties he encountered and the means he employed to overcome them."  | |
|
▾Library descriptions No library descriptions found.
|
Google Books — Loading...
| Swap |
Ebooks |
Audio |
| — | 1 pay | — |
Popular covers 
RatingAverage: (4.5)| 0.5 | | | 1 | | | 1.5 | | | 2 | | | 2.5 | | | 3 | | | 3.5 | | | 4 | | | 4.5 | 1 | | 5 | |
|