A more appropriate title might be “The Nicklebys” or “The Nickleby Family”. Mean, miserly Uncle Ralph is as much the center of the novel as Nicholas, and there’s Kate Nickleby, and Nicholas’s mother. It’s a Victorian plot full of coincidences and family secrets – a joy to read and discover. ( )

My fourth Dickens read, and maybe my second favorite, right behind David Copperfield. It's the same sort of traveling feast of characters as that and the Pickwick Papers, and the usual good vs. evil storyline. The secondary characters in this one are so good, though, that it makes up for some of the more formulaic aspects: La Creevy, John Browdie, Newman Noggs, and the deliciously good villains: "schoolmeasther" Squeers, Ralph Nickleby, and Arthur Gride. I don't remember if most Dickens books have such a great plot twist at the end as this one, but it was a good one!This might be the fastest I've ever read a Dickens novel: 15 days! ( )

I have been meaning to read Nicholas Nickleby for years (ever since the most recent movie version came out), and I'm sorry it took me as long as it did because I thoroughly enjoyed this book.

Dicken's subtle humor and unparalleled skill for description help speed the reader through this long book(although there are a number of irrelevant side plots that really add nothing to the novel as a whole, courtesy of the fact that this book was originally written as a serial). I will say that I a noticed the often heard criticism of Dickens that there are a lot of rather miraculous coincidences. That aside, a great book. And certainly not my last Dickens. ( )

In Nicholas Nickleby we find Dickens consolidating his approach begun in his two previous novels, returning to some of the humor found in Pickwick while continuing the social criticism begun in Oliver Twist. The focus is on boys' boarding schools in Yorkshire which were notorious for their poor conditions. Early in 1838 Dickens visited the schools in Yorkshire accompanied by his illustrator Hablot Browne and Dickens used some of his experiences in his novel. With Nicholas Nickleby comes Dickens first attempt using a young man as his protagonist and incorporating the bildungsroman style into the novel along with the picaresque approach that was so effective in Pickwick Papers. The novel begins with Nicholas and his sister Kate and their mother destitute upon the death of their father. Turning to their uncle, Ralph Nickleby, they find a man comparable to Dicken's later creation, Marley, (whose ghost will torment Scrooge). Nicholas is sent to Mr. Wackford Squeer's Academy, Dotheboys Hall where he assists Mr. Squeers. His education is immediate and jolting to his refined character.
Some of Dickens' main themes the theater. It is a passion of Dickens and that passion is quite evident in this novel. Once Nicholas has left the "boys' school" run by the Squeers he soon takes up with a theater troupe. He is successful translating plays from French into English and doing some acting. This leads me to the theme of illusion and reality. There are examples of this in almost every chapter. In the first scenes of the novel we see Nicholas' family lose their modest wealth when his father's investments are more illusory than real. Nicholas' mother turns to her brother-in-law for help upon the death of her husband only to find any notion of family bonds is also an illusion. Of course the "school" where Nicholas is posted by his uncle Ralph is an utter illusion, much to the detriment of the boys confined therein. As we read further in the novel we find that characters are more likely to not be what they first seem to be; finally, it is somewhat ironic that Nicholas would find himself in a theater troupe learning the profession of creating illusions for a paying audience.

The number of characters seems to grow geometrically as is typical in most of Dicken's novels, but most of the characters introduced so far are interesting enough to keep the reader's attention. Nicholas' growth and education (this novel is a bildungsroman of sorts) is the most interesting aspect of the novel for this reader. But I wonder what it would be like to have the story told from the point of view of his sister Kate? The city of London is very much a character in the novel with Dickens sharing his love for this city more than once probably drawing on the experiences he had on the long walks that he often took (cf. pp. 390 & 446, and 2) the narrator includes brief comments on the state of novel-writing itself (p. 345).

Nicholas Nickleby ends well for Nicholas and his sister Kate. Along with their mother they can look forward to a much brighter future than the one that they faced as the novel began. In creating this 'happy' ending Dickens left many of the most eccentric comic characters by the wayside, gone are the Crummles and Miss Knagg along with other minor characters left by the wayside. Whether this is a flaw in the novel (perhaps) or not the last section of the story does move rapidly to tie up loose ends and provide answers to the more intricate mysteries of relations among the characters. For the details of these answers I suggest you read the novel.

In spite of its seeming lack of structure, a claim which is belied by the strong arcs of both Nicholas' education in life and Ralph Nickleby's search for rewards for his greed and miserliness, the novel is Dickens' first success in the genre (his previous three books being journalistic and picaresque treats, but not novels). One theme that is embodied in this novel is expressed by Newman Noggs as Nicholas despairs that the schemes of Ralph and Arthur Gride will defeat him, his family and Madeline Bray (his one true love). Newman responds with what may be considered the main theme of the novel:

'Hope to the last,' said Newman, clapping him on the back. 'Always hope, that's a dear boy. Never leave off hoping, it don't answer. Don't leave a stone unturned. It's always something to know know you've done the most you could. But don't leave off hoping, or it's of no use doing anything. Hope, hope to the last!'
- p. 641, Nicholas Nickleby

As a reader you have hope for the good in Nicholas and Newman and John Browdie with the support of the Cherryble brothers; and, you have hope that the evil of Ralph Nickleby, Gride and Squeers will receive justice. You hope to the last. ( )

Heavyweight classic. very funny, in that old-fashioned sort of way, but fuck, it's long. Well worth it though. Not something to be enjoyed on a hot summer day. I'd rather read it in winter with a cup of hot chocolate. The characters are hilarious. I wish people still wrote like that. ( )

http://www.lonelymountain.net/books/j... ( )

A book with great societal impact
September 2000

I don't want to say much about the quality of the novel itself. I find it the most two-dimensional of all his novels (and I've read the Old Curiousity Shop, which is full of grotesqueries!). But I do want to provide some perspective as to the background of this novel.

Before Dickens wrote this novel, some friends of his brought to his notice of horrid boarding schools in the Yorkshire area. Dickens traveled the countryside incognito, visiting the schools and some people in the area. He found that these schools were being run under the principle of being storehouses for unwanted boys. "Natural" children, inconvenient children from a first marriage, children of widowers who didn't have time to bring up their boys were shipped off to these schools, never to come home for the holidays, and under most circumstances the boy wouldn't make it to the age of 18 at which time he would be ejected from the school with no useful learning.

Part of the motivation of this novel was to bring this practice to light -- many of the people in Yorkshire did not know what was going on the schools and those who did know did not see what they could do about it.

Then Nicholas Nickleby started to be published. Like all of his novels, this book came out in 3-chapter installments. Well before the book was halfway over, people spontaneously gathered around some of these schools, ejected children and masters alike, and set the buildings to torch. By the end of publication, the infamous Yorkshire schools were totally gone.

So keep this in mind while reading this book, which seems juvenile and flat compared even his previous two novels, Oliver Twist and the Pickwick Papers. This is the only of Dickens' novels to have an immediate and profound impact in his society. When was the last time you heard of a novel creating effective activism in a community?

1760 The Life & Adventures of Nicholas Nickleby, by Charles Dickens (read 13 Jan 1983) When I heard that the stage presentation of this book was to be on TV I began to read the book. I was almost finished with the book when I saw the TV play. This is quite a book, with all the Dickens traits and defects. It was first published as a book in 1839 and I found it absorbing at times, but also discursive and ridiculous. Nicholas Nickleby goes to a Yorkshire school as an assistant to the impossible Waxford Squeers, whom he beats up and leaves with Smike. They go on the stage awhile, and then Nick goes to work for the Cheeryble Brothers. Ralph Nickleby, the evil uncle, tries to do evil things but is consistently thwarted, includng the marriage of Nicholas' beloved Madeline to an old miser. Really, as one thinks about it it all seems quite stupid. But it had its moments. ( )

I had never read this before 2008 because I assumed it would be exactly like Oliver Twist, which I can't stand. Between OT and Pickwick Papers I was firmly against early Dickens, but then I finally picked this up, and found myself laughing out loud every other page, and rushing home from errands so I could read more, and generally having a perfect reading experience. Yay! This is what Dickens should always be.

Far from the best of Dickens' novels. It could have been much shorter and better.

It is saved by often sarcastic tone in the narration, which is quite enjoyable. ( )

I am glad I chose Nicholas Nickleby to be the first Dickens book to complete on my own (not counting the required 6th grade reading of A Christmas Carol). Sure, there's the downtrodden miserable children and nasty older men, but I didn't have the droopy feeling of depression I thought I'd feel while reading. Sometimes the story would go off tangent (the storytelling on the first journey to Yorkshire left me slightly impatient), but most books I've read written in the 19th century went that way. Besides, the story moved forward when it needed to. Once I'd learned to keep track of the vast cast of characters, it was just fine. Plus, (slight spoiler) it cleans up very well at the end.

As for Ralph Nickleby, the evil uncle, can I just say he makes Ebenezer Scrooge look like an absolute saint! At least Scrooge didn't make a point to ruin people's lives, especially not his own family (as I recall, Scrooge had kind feelings for his nephew, but swept it under the rug for most of that story.) Of course, Ralph's ending looked to be a moral to the reader - a very Victorian choice of eventuality,

The other characters are all well painted if perhaps caricatures - the pathetic and saintly Smike, the burly and heavily accented Browdie, a weak gentleman named Verisopht...so much fun to keep track of. Favorite first name: Wackford.

All in all, enjoyed this, and will continue with Dickens a little longer. ( )

A main character of this novel is a good young man, and his name is Nicholas. His family was in great poverty because his father past away. Therefore, he and his family had to rely on their uncle. He is cruel and rapacious person. Nicholas went out into the world, and experienced many things. His courageous behavior remained in my mind, and I really like this book.

So far the only Dickens novel I've read. Memorable characters, good pace; seems overly long, but it was originally published as a serial. Enjoyable enough I'll likely return to Dickens some day. ( )

Full review ) - in summary: a long novel but rewarding in retrospect with many layers and themes of timeless value. ( )

A wonderful story with so many interesting and memorable characters. Much more emotionally engaging than I had predicted. One of my favourite books by Dickens - a true masterpiece. ( )

Nicholas' father has died and left his family in the mercy of his brother. Many adventures follow as they are forced to live in London penniless. ( )

My favorite Dickens book so far. I'll read this one again someday. ( )

What is not to love about Nicholas Nickleby? Everything you love in normal Dickens, plus righteous fisticuffs. ( )

My favorite book from Dickens! ( )

This one kept me from my A-level studies. Bad book! Bad little book! A grotesque and sprawling masterpiece. ( )

Slightly more interesting than David Copperfield. One problem with
these sort of things is they often seem to be way, way too long. This
may have been intentional, of course, if he was getting paid by the
length of the thing. Anyway, it is slightly amusing, but you do really
have to want to read it.

http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/967 ( )

filled with Dickens usual chacaters, but it is very good ( )

One of Dickens early works, depending on change of scene rather than character development for its plot points. It’s very clear in places that Dickens was being paid by the word for this, as it’s quite tediously overwritten and lengthy, but it’s still one of his more readable novels. The modern reader can skip some of the more overly sentimental scenes, and often has to be forcibly restrained from kicking Kate Nickleby for being such a woose, but the comedy of some of the set pieces still charms. ( )