The one word that comes to mind throughout reading this book was ambivalence. Not about the subject matter, but about the book itself. What was Vollmann really trying to accomplish? Who does he think he is to broach such a subject with such a voice? And why must he write so confoundingly? The answers to these questions revealed themselves slowly and towards the end of the book. In short, he is appealing not to the masses but to the rich. He is following in the footsteps of sociologists who founded the science, often speaking like they did from their late 19th century literary customs. Long-winded for sure, but ultimately readable if you can stick with it. Pleasure reading this book was not; both the subject matter and the writing style sees to that. But I suppose that was his point. This book was not meant to be pleasurable in the least.

Vollmann travels around the world asking poor people why some are poor and others are rich. He asks if rich people have a duty to poor people and what can be done to help rectify the situation. The answers he receives do nothing to alleviate their situation. In the end, it is as it has been from the beginning of time so it seems - some are rich and others are poor because that is just the way it is. Nor does he offer any answers himself. He does, however, attempt to describe the phenomena that go along with poverty. In his view, poverty entails invisibility, deformity, unwantedness, dependence, accident-prone-ness, pain, numbness, and estrangement.

While the stories of these people and their accompanying photographs were intriguing, he fails to answer the question that caused the book to be written. Perhaps that was the point after all - there are no answers. The elements that make up the impoverished population are so vast and ingrained that there really is no way to remedy them. It runs much deeper and much stronger than any cursory look into the problem using anecdotal evidence could ever hope to explain let alone fix.

So I read the book, and I learned something. While what I learned was neither groundbreaking nor life changing, perhaps I will look differently at the next person who solicits me for money on the street and perhaps I will react differently to the request. After all, I am rich when you look at it relatively; but then again, relatively speaking, so might they be too.

Not the typical Vollmann work - non-fiction research book, sociological in nature. Writing is strong as usual but not as amazing and sheerly overwhelming as normal. At times he seems to lapse or force his writing into prosaic metaphors overly flowery and excessive, or overdone superlatives -- hard to explain but not Vollmann-esque, a little over the top. As far as the content, very strong, research is good, he makes the points clearly. A few other criticisms: the book has over 100 pictures of poor people at the end of the book, I would have like them to be serialized in chronological order as they appear in the book; as it was I had to jump around to find them. Would have loved the pictures to be in the middle. Also, since most of the pictures were grainy black and white, I am not sure why they didn't just put the pictures in as they came up--they were not repeated enough to make it worth having a separate section. Some of the tables are not well marked or referenced. Small things to be sure and shouldn't put off a reader. The concept of calculating relative daily wages across time, continents, and other variables is brilliant. I guess I just didn't like the flow. However the research is non pareil and I'm not sure you'd get that kind of field research anywhere else: the scientist would not have the heart and perspective. ( )

"Throughout the book, I read about people who have been dispossessed of property, belongings, employment, dignity, or security due to circumstances that are oftentimes beyond their control. It made me thankful for what I do have and who I am. It saddened me for those whose lives consist of a struggle for mere survival."

Read it all at http://troysworktable.blogspot.com/20... ( )