Loading... Relativity This Special & General Theory (1916)by Albert Einstein
Work detailsRelativity: The Special and General Theory by Albert Einstein (1916)
Loading...
Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book. No current Talk conversations about this book. This was one of the first opportunities for Americans to read about relativity. Wellwritten discussion of a complex subject. Unfortunately, Einstein's ideas on time and synchronicity do not comply with quantum mechanics. Given that quantum theory has an extensive set of experiments demonstrating these concepts it is a shame that Einstein was never able to bring his theory into alignment with reality. Still a great read though. In one of the magically aimless opportunities afforded by a liberal arts education, I took an honors sciences class sophomore year on the Theory of Relativity. Over the course of the semester, we studied the theory, its associated maths, and its implications. It was possibly my favorite class over the course of 19 years of formal education. We of course read and discussed this book, which is remarkably approachable. This short text explains the ideas behind Relativity without going too deep into Calculus and other such things. It says it talks about it from a Philosophical standpoint, but that isn't entirely true. It does cover some mathematics, such as the Lorenz Transforms and other such things. The main problem I have with this book is the typos. Many spelling errors exist in this book. Weird spacing is also extant in this book. It also doesn't call the ratio of a circle's circumference to its radius pi, it calls it p which might be confusing to some. In some other sections it even uses the Greek Letter, so I don't understand the idea behind the typography in this book. The thing that saves it is the fact that it is pretty well done with explaining the ideas. If you are familiar with Relativity and its ideas, this book won't enlighten you further or shed any new light on this subject. In that sense, it is pretty good for a layman, but if you want something more, you might want to look elsewhere. no reviews  add a review
Is contained in
References to this work on external resources. Wikipedia in English (11)Albert Einstein (18791955), pacifist and humanitarian, has been universally acclaimed the greatest theoretical physicist who ever lived. Adapting the old laws of physics to Einstein's spacetime resulted in "relativistic" physics. He, more than anyone else, realized that every physical theory is largely an invention of the mind, a mathematical model used to "mimic" a certain domain of experimental facts. Einstein's work on relativity is indeed the greatest contribution to the philosophy of science. It has long been thought that only a handful of scientists could comprehend Einstein's theory of relativity. But in this book the inventor himself explains both the special and the general theories in terms that the layman can understand. No library descriptions found.

Google Books — Loading... Popular coversRatingAverage:
HighBridge AudioAn edition of this book was published by HighBridge Audio. HighBridgeAn edition of this book was published by HighBridge. Is this you?Become a LibraryThing Author. 
For the most part this book is excellent, introducing the minimal amount of mathematics and formal language necessary to understand the most important and fundamental concepts of Einstein's theories in a way that is accessible whilst concise. It might be possible to do it better with a bigger book, a less formal style and a lot more diagrams but it very interesting to get Einstein's unique perspective as originator of the theories and insight into his thought processes.
A few sections are remarkable in contrast with the rest, for being unclear. The section on addition of velocities in special relativity leaves rather more to the reader than anything else in the book, mathematically, and when I looked it up it turned out to be much easier to work out using basic calculus than algebraic division  and the bit that wasn't clear was that a division of two equations was what was required. This section could be skipped without losing much.
The remainder of the muddy sections come at the back end of the section on general relativity. The simplest precise mathematical formulation of this theory is expressed using tensors  and tensor algebra is way beyond what anybody encounters in standard school maths or physics curricula. Einstein makes no attempt to explain it and in fact never shows the fundamental equation of general relativity. This makes it very hard for him to explain how gravitational fields and spacetime interact, which leads to the lack of clarity in the latter stages of this part of the book. Things get easier and clearer again when he moves on to relativity and cosmology.
The final part of the book is a collection of appendices expanding on things discussed earlier on. I required pen and paper to check the derivation of the Lorentz Transformations from first principles  but this section could just be skipped if the maths bothers you  it doesn't add a lot but it is interesting to see it, if your algebra is up to it.
The most rewarding thing for me, since nothing here is completely new to me, was listening to Einstein's voice. He seemed to come at things from a viewpoint much more generally philosophical than most present day physicists would, discussing Kant, Descartes and Hume, for instance. The section on the concept of "empty space" was fascinating  he concludes that general relativity precludes this notion  one cannot have spacetime without it containing "fields." What he means is fields of force  the electromagnetic field, gravitational field etc. This implies the notion of a field being present even if its magnitude is zero  which is a bizarre concept. Modern quantum mechanics backs these ideas to the hilt and leads me to think that one of the most important areas of inquiry for fundamental physics as it stands is the connection between the classical idea of spacetime and the quantum idea of the vacuum. The fundamental nature of both is obscure  and in some sense they should be the same thing.
Overall this is an excellent introduction to special relativity and at least the conceptual underpinnings of general relativity, if not of the full theory, which really just can't be explained properly without knowledge of tensors. ( )