HomeGroupsTalkMoreZeitgeist
Search Site
This site uses cookies to deliver our services, improve performance, for analytics, and (if not signed in) for advertising. By using LibraryThing you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your use of the site and services is subject to these policies and terms.

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

Loading...
MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingMentions
1,779339,546 (3.81)29
Extensively revised by Nabokov in 1965--thirty years after its original publication--Despair is the wickedly inventive and richly derisive story of Hermann, a man who undertakes the perfect crime--his own murder.
  1. 00
    The Prestige by Christopher Priest (Jarandel)
    Jarandel: The presence or absence of doubles leads protagonists to the strangest extremities. Also, unreliable narrators.
  2. 00
    Where There's Love, There's Hate by Adolfo Bioy Casares (CGlanovsky)
    CGlanovsky: Unreliable narrators, packed with literary references, and appear at first to have cliched plots.
Loading...

Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.

No current Talk conversations about this book.

» See also 29 mentions

English (30)  Spanish (1)  Italian (1)  All languages (32)
Showing 1-5 of 30 (next | show all)
Features an unpleasant, unreliable narrator in Hermann, who is similar to, but crucially lacks the perverse appeal of, Nabokov's Humbert. First half of the novel I found almost unbearably frothy and obnoxious. As the plot finally makes its delayed appearance matters improve, and as a reviewer I follow says, Nabokov ends up taking the piss out of Dostoyevsky. Problem is, I now feel inclined to side with Dostoyevsky! This won't be one of my favorite Nabokovs. ( )
  lelandleslie | Feb 24, 2024 |
Readble, sure. It's also quite funny at times, and some of Nabokov's insights into humanity (via the lens of Hermann) are pretty interesting. The implied political nature of the work gives it something to chew on, too; on the whole, there's a surprising lot for a modern reader to enjoy. But, at all times, it just feels like a "minor" book, a B-movie type throwaway. ( )
  cptcutless | Oct 29, 2023 |
I'm not sure what all the hype is about. I've been meaning to read Nabokov for a while, but you gotta start with Lolita right? Well, to be honest, I just couldn't bring myself to read it. I'm not for censorship however I am for personal choice and I find the subject matter pretty distasteful and honestly just didn't want to spend my reading time with it. Still, you have to read Nabokov right? Well Despair was my compromise. I was pretty disappointed. I'd been hearing what a brilliant writer he was for years. I just don't see it. He's good. The book was well written, but I wouldn't say there was anything special about it. Not only that the main character was extremally unlikable. Not in that delicious character who you love to hate sort of way. Just character who you wish would go away sort of way. I'm glad I finally had a go at Nabokov, but I think this will by my last book of his. ( )
  ZephyrusW | Mar 22, 2023 |
This is Nabokov's Dostoevskian novel, albeit only in the choice of topic -- his language and style is completely unDostoevsky-like. This is not surprising given Nabokov's disdain for Dostoevsky as a writer. The narrator makes jabs at "Dusty" often, refers to "The Double" and "Crime and Punishment" openly and with a kind of sneer.

In brief, the narrator has met his double in the person of a vagabond, starts a relationship with this person, then plans a nefarious crime, it seems, for the sake of writing about it. Because this narrator is, like Nabokov, a well-educated, elegant, Russian emigre and not the harassed petty clerk of Dostoevsky's tale, he is very concerned with the mechanics of writing the story. The first chapters often bring up literary problems, like which events should he speak of first, details of place, how things should be introduced and he comes back to the issue of writing, especially at the end. Leave it to Nabokov to tell Dostoevsky how to write.

It is an interesting piece -- Nabokov's first novel, reworked 30 or so years later --with a wonderful, but not unexpected, little twist near the end. Nevertheless, what's missing from "Despair" is the essence of a Dostoevsky novel: the angst and frisson, inelegant, hysterical and so compelling. ( )
  Marse | Dec 2, 2021 |
The last paragraph would add half a star to my rating. ( )
  stravinsky | Dec 28, 2020 |
Showing 1-5 of 30 (next | show all)
no reviews | add a review
You must log in to edit Common Knowledge data.
For more help see the Common Knowledge help page.
Canonical title
Original title
Alternative titles
Original publication date
People/Characters
Important places
Important events
Related movies
Epigraph
Dedication
To Véra
First words
Quotations
Last words
Disambiguation notice
Publisher's editors
Blurbers
Original language
Canonical DDC/MDS
Canonical LCC

References to this work on external resources.

Wikipedia in English (1)

Extensively revised by Nabokov in 1965--thirty years after its original publication--Despair is the wickedly inventive and richly derisive story of Hermann, a man who undertakes the perfect crime--his own murder.

No library descriptions found.

Book description
Haiku summary

Current Discussions

None

Popular covers

Quick Links

Rating

Average: (3.81)
0.5
1 6
1.5
2 16
2.5 3
3 72
3.5 18
4 131
4.5 13
5 67

Is this you?

Become a LibraryThing Author.

Penguin Australia

2 editions of this book were published by Penguin Australia.

Editions: 014118454X, 0141196963

 

About | Contact | Privacy/Terms | Help/FAQs | Blog | Store | APIs | TinyCat | Legacy Libraries | Early Reviewers | Common Knowledge | 202,660,549 books! | Top bar: Always visible