|
Loading...
LibraryThing recommendationsMember recommendationsLoading...
won't like
will probably not like
will probably like
will like
will love Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book. no reviews | add a review
References to this work on external resources.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Book description |
|
This series is the only comprehensive narration of Western history written from the orthodox Catholic perspective still in print. How would a historical narrative read if the author began with these first principles: Truth exists; the Incarnation happened? This series is essential reading for those who consider the West worth defending.
(retrieved from Amazon Wed, 06 Jan 2010 02:26:59 -0500)
The first test round has been closed. Visit the Open Shelves Classification group for details.
Quick Links |
The one large criticism I'd make, now that I think about it, is that Carroll sort of jumps from major episode to major episode, so that the book reads like a sequence of shorter histories rather than a unified whole. That said, I've never read a history of the Middle Ages that tries to present a narrative of the whole era (two such narratives suggest themselves: the Hohenstaufens versus the Papacy, and the Normans versus the world), so I'm not criticizing him too strongly for it. Suffice it to say that Chesterton was right, though: the medieval ideal "was not tried and found wanting, but found difficult, and left untried." The Middle Ages were _much_ shorter than we imagine they were: only about 450 years, about the same length of time as the Han Dynasty, passed between the Norman Conquest and the Protestant Reformation. (