|
Loading... A New Kind of Scienceby Stephen Wolfram
Stephen Wolfram is a little bit full of himself; this book is not nearly as revolutionary or paradigm-shattering as he seems to think. Nonetheless, this is a fascinating (if very long) book containing all sorts of interesting ideas about automata, recursion, programming, and more. ( )A mind-blowing book of incredible density. A completely new way to think about the world and how science describes it and how it works. What can be said? I was in awe of this book before I even opened the cover; it is huge, and self-published. Ah, but what glorious, middle-finger-in-your-face insouciance to the scientific mainstream! A hard read, for all but the most dedicated. A controversial subject, the use of computer modeling to explore scientific concepts, as a replacement for the (conventional) scientific method. Wolfram has turned into such a crank that I can't even bear to finish reading his book. Given the conspicuous absence of proper citations, the admittedly pretty pictures are the only reason to buy the book at all. I read the first 300 pages of this book and then went on to other things. It’s not that the writing was bad or uninteresting; I just got tired of the level of study that the book demanded. From the pages I did read I can say that the author is extremely thorough in his exploration, especially with respect to cellular automata where he enumerates every variety and explores every permutation in their behavior. He does an excellent job organizing and explaining the material, and the book is beautifully designed and printed. The resolution of the diagrams is the finest I've seen and it's fun just looking through them all. If you are into mathematics, computer science, or automata I would recommend getting this book. If for nothing else than browsing through the 350 pages of notes at the end. If you’re a general science reader you'll probably be disappointed. What is new in this book is not science. What is science in this book is not new. The much-noticed and -reviewed tome (1200+ pages) by the creator of Mathematica. He idiosyncratically explores the use of simple computer programs as an alternative to traditional mathematics. He expects that all the sciences will now be revolutionized, but I doubt that the world will play along. There are excerpts at www.wolframscience.com. Many of the reviews of this book have been quite savage, but the savageness, it seems to me, is inversely related to the fraction of the book that the reviewer had actually read. I, like many others, was aware of the marketing hype before its publication, and waited for its production with a feeling something like that of a child anticipating a Christmas, an incomprehensible number of weeks off. I actually read a good part of this book, and found it to be something quite awesome. Moreover, I was not at all put off by its idiosyncratic style, and I much appreciated its typography, layout and the richness in its illustrations. I was awed at the scope of the work, much provoked and entertained by it. A faithful user of Mathematica (I used it to derive my first simulation of the trebuchet, described at www.algobeautytreb.com), I am awed by the number of programs that Wolfram lists. Perhaps the most impressive aspect of this work is the breadth of topics that are covered. Computational hydrodynamics and thermodynamics, free will and language, cryptography and logic, quantum mechanics and Feynmen diagrams, crystallization, coarsening foams and sandpiles, evolution and embryology, traffic and financial markets. Is there any other work having a single author that encompasses such a collection? The notes section, about 300 pages long, is wonderful to read all by itself. Each topic has its bit of history related, and there are many descriptions of things discovered and things yet to be discovered, told in a most entertaining and readable style. I could even recommend, perhaps, that some readers should read this section first. My reaction toward the "bottom line" hypothesis, that cellular automata provide a real breakthrough in understanding the world, is a little agnostic, perhaps. Interesting in many ways, and the hydrodynamic model is clearly a fruitful one--I've seen some quite stunning movies of certain phenomena (such as two liquids of different density that are mixing). I really can't evaluate some of the claims Wolfram makes, and others seem to be a bit overblown. I guess my feeling is something like the child that woke up on Christmas morning hoping for that bicycle, but finding a chemistry set instead. While I didn't get exactly what I'd hoped for, the chemistry set is intriguing--something may come of it yet! How can complexity evolve from simple systems? |
|