

|
Loading... Feynman's Lost Lecture: The Motion of Planets Around the Sun (original 1996; edition 1996)by David L. Goodstein
Work detailsFeynman’s Lost Lecture; The Motion of Planets Around the Sun by David L. Goodstein (1996) None. Wow, this is brilliant. And it's pitched at a level that I can even follow. This is a highly engaging lecture, but you have to work to 'get' the argument that Mr. Feymann makes regarding the elliptical orbit of our planets. This is a very rewarding book, which features a CD of Mr. Feymann 'proving' the shape of orbits using relatively simple math. no reviews | add a review
Amazon.com Amazon.com Review (ISBN 0393039188, Hardcover)Richard Feynman, the rock star of theoretical physics, has left an image that belies his nerdy side. Not many bongo-playing surfer beatniks would have spent hours of their spare time proving Newton's law of elliptical planetary motion using only plane geometry. But Feynman's Lost Lecture: The Motion of Planets Around the Sun shows that the great man did just that. Originally delivered to an introductory physics class at Caltech in 1963, this 76-minute CD and book set contains everything the math-savvy listener needs to savor the pleasures of applied math. Caltech physicist David L. Goodstein and archivist Judith R. Goodstein found the notes and tape amid another professor's papers and set to work making sense of them; unfortunately, photographs of the blackboard drawings didn't survive. The book briefly covers their find and recovery work, then presents the proof as reconstructed--crucial reading if one is to follow the lecture. There's nothing easy about it, as Feynman acknowledges in the lecture:I am going to give what I will call an elementary demonstration. "Elementary" means that very little is required to know ahead of time in order to understand it, except to have an infinite amount of intelligence.He means, instead, that he is strictly using geometrical methods to reach his destination, which explains why it was so difficult to reconstruct without his diagrams. His charming Brooklyn accent and good humor show through in this lecture, even if the material is quite a bit drier than his fans might expect. Still, those interested in adding a new dimension to their understanding of this brilliant scientist--and those with a deep interest in Newtonian physics--will find The Motion of Planets Around the Sun a rare and unexpected treat. --Rob Lightner (retrieved from Amazon Tue, 15 Jan 2013 07:23:16 -0500) No library descriptions found. |
Google Books — Loading...Popular coversRatingAverage: (3.86)
Is this you?Become a LibraryThing Author. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I never studied Physics in school, but read a few books on the subject over the years, especially when my interest in Astronomy hit a fevered pitch around twenty-five years (or more) ago. Fortunately, I have a gift for all-things-mathematical, and was able to follow his lecture while driving at 70 mph up the highway. Planetary Motion explained in Plane Geometry – and done so eloquently! Then he follows that up with (if I recall correctly) an explanation of Rutherford’s Law (the scattering of subatomic particles) using PG again! When the lecture was over, the tape recorder was left running for another fifteen minutes as students came up to him and asked questions about various aspects of his lecture. He was generous to a fault with his time and his enthusiasm, and worked out the misunderstanding/answers with them.
Feynman speaks in the same style as he writes. Engaging would be a good word to start with. It was thrilling to hear him make comments to himself, give brief asides about a point he had just made, off-the-cuff remarks… The man was as brilliant as they come, and endlessly curious.
I can’t comment about the book because it is not available to me. So, suffice to say that if you have a half-way decent background in Math, you could probably learn from listening to the CD. If you have a nerdy side to you, you’ll probably like this more than you’d prefer to admit. I wish I had more professors with his level of enthusiasm when I went to college! (