|
Loading... Spook: Science Tackles the Afterlifeby Mary Roach
LibraryThing recommendationsMember recommendationsLoading...
won't like
will probably not like
will probably like
will like
will love Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book. In much the same way she considers cadavers and sex, Mary Roach looks at the interesting history behind our dead. She considers spiritualists, weighing the soul, and other after-death issues. ( )In Spook reporter Mary Roach delves into the world of paranormal research to bring to light modern science's tenuous relationship with the afterlife. Like Stiff and Bonk, Roach's writing is peppered with anecdotes and diverting travel stories, although her own voice is far more aggressive towards her subject than her other two publications (born from Roach's own skepticism, no doubt). While Spook is both interesting and entertaining I believe Roach is at her best when she approaches more quantifiable subjects, leaving Spook at the bottom of the Roach-stack. I found this extremely entertaining. Roach researched all sorts of experiments into attempts to contact dead people--supposed reincarnated people, mediums, attempts to weigh souls departing from the dead, etc. She tries out some of the methods herself and even goes to "medium school," but of course, none of the methods work. My only problem with the book is that, at the beginning, Roach presents it as some sort of evaluation of whether people have souls, when really it is a tour of parapsychology methods and experiments that most people--including those who believe in the afterlife--would dismiss as ridiculous. Mary Roach has already tackled sex and corpses, now she tackles the afterlife. Spook was actually pretty good in Roach's typical fun but scientific way. Roach explores reincarnation, whether a soul exists (is it the big toe? or the sperm?), how much a soul weighs (surprisingly a lot of tests to determine this), ectoplasm, mediums, etc. She actually got to speak with Allison Du Bois, who is the basis of the TV series Medium. I still don't believe quite a bit, and neither did Roach, but I do know that sometimes faith and belief is not based on fact or anything provable. It just is. The writer's command of the language is superb. Her ability to swing from serious to intelligently flippant and back again without missing a step is amazing. While I did not find her to be "hilarious" as some have advertised, she is truly funny, a genuinely talented writer. What she is not, in this book at least, is "objective", or at least not as objective as she claims (or perhaps thinks) she is. Yes, there are a thousand flaws to be found in the many areas of pseudoscience she has investigated in this book. And yes, there are certainly a large number of "practitioners" of the various aspects of afterlife exploration she touches on who are frauds, or who are fooling themselves, even if they did not fool her. But it still appears that her membrane of disbelief is not to be broken by any evidence, period. If it is possible that a certain something that seems paranormal MIGHT be caused by radio waves or thunder clouds or acid rain or whatever, then surely ALL such occurrences must be produced that same, mundane and NOT paranormal way. She says she wants to believe, but either she is not being paid to believe or she simply does not dare. Still, I LOVE her writing. And her attitude is quite endearing. I thoroughly enjoyed the book even though I could not buy into all of the skeptical conclusions. no reviews | add a review
References to this work on external resources.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Book description |
|
(retrieved from Amazon Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:58:05 -0400)
The first test round has been closed. Visit the Open Shelves Classification group for details.
Quick Links |