|
Loading... Quirkology: How We Discover the Big Truths in Small Thingsby Richard Wiseman
LibraryThing recommendationsMember recommendationsLoading...
won't like
will probably not like
will probably like
will like
will love Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book. My initial impression as I began reading this book was that this was all sort of silly pretend science telling me little that I didn't already know or wouldn't have guessed. My respect for the book and research grew as I read it although in the end it is a book of intriguing facts. It did become clear that human beings are much more susceptible to suggestion than one could imagine. We respond to people, making serious life and death decisions in politics and courtrooms on the bases of nose shape, last name, number of blinks let alone race and gender. Humans, also performed miserably in terms of honesty and giving. I found the chapter on "funny jokes" fell particularly flat. None of them warranted more than half a chuckle. I once spoke after this author at a conference on memory. You are on a hiding to nothing if you speak after a magician. A good title which doesn't really give anything away. What you get is how your birth date impacts on your personality, the psychology of lying and deception, superstition, decision making, humour and morality. All these subject are examined through little known scientific studies and the author tries to end up giving us the distilled common sense wisdom version of the findings. Humorous and entertaining but a little bit un-satisfying. It felt like half a book to me - needed more of the same. science, social psychology, non fiction, no reviews | add a review
References to this work on external resources.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Book description |
|
(retrieved from Amazon Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:58:13 -0400)
The first test round has been closed. Visit the Open Shelves Classification group for details.
Quick Links |
The high point of the book? The typo (?) on page 188 which states "Although Freud claimed to be a scientist, many of his ideas are completely untesticle." Now, is that a deliberate Freudian slip … or what? (