

|
Loading... Dangerous Liaisons (Barnes & Noble Classics) (original 1782; edition 1782)by Pierre-Ambrois-Francois Choderlos de Laclos, Helen Constantine (Contributor), Helen Constantine (Editor), Helen Constantine (Translator)
Work detailsLes Liaisons Dangereuses by Pierre Choderlos de Laclos (1782)
My audiobook was a Librivox.org download. The main narrator is very good. There are 4 other narrators that at most read 15 of the 175 letters of the book. This is high intrigue, deception, envy, jealousy, manipulation, innocence lost, love lost at its best. One of my favorite parts is "Ce n'est pas de ma faute" letter. I still get shivers hearing John Malkovich acting this out in the movie. As good as I remembered when I first read it, saw it on film and now listened to it. Shocking! Scandalous! An outrage to public decency! This book must have caused quite a stir when it was first printed in the late 1700's. Sexual innuendo leaps from the pages of this beautifully written epistolary novel. De Laclos certainly accomplished what he set out to do, to create a work that would last long after his death. The Marquise de Merteuil and the Vicomte de Valmont are two of the most devious minded characters I've ever had the pleasure to be disgusted by. Seriously. Still, I had to admire their dedication. They want revenge and will stop at nothing to get it. They know what they are doing and they do it well. I thoroughly savored every page of Dangerous Liaisons. Thank you to The Classics Club for spinning this book in my direction. The wit and wickedness will be on my mind for a long time to come. Definitely the best epistolary book I have ever read and probably one of the best novels displaying the double morale in the eighteenth century Paris. Monsieur de Laclos masters the style, creating two hero-villain characters whom, although monsters without scruples, one can't help to admire. They are playful, amusing, witty and skillful in the art of deception. They are also vain, prideful creatures who seek their own pleasure without caring for the outcome of their poor victims. Marquise de Merteuil and Vicomte de Valmont are incredibly wealthy and bored to death . So they play dangerous games for entertainment, imposing challenges to each other, seducing young virgins, making adulteress out of prude virtuous women, taking revenge of formers lovers ruining their reputation... and they succeed in doing all the mischief they want without being discovered. What's more, they are honourable and well received in society! Imagine their mirth when they accomplish every evil scheme they propose while they become their victims' only friends and saviours. But apart from the elaborated style and the amusing display of strategic tactics which thread the story, one can't miss the allusion to the thin line of what's morally right or wrong. Is "what is socially accepted" the true and only way? Marquise de Merteuil and Vicomte de Valmont are not exemplary models of sincerity or frankness, but they challenge the imposed rules somehow, they outwit hypocrisy, the problem is that they only do it to achieve personal gratification, corrupting their souls and everyone who dare to trust in them. In my opinion, it's incredible that a novel written more than 180 years ago, might still stir deep emotions in those who can invest a moment of their time to think about the possible reasons that led a man like M. de Laclos to write this controversial story. Don't take this novel only as a mere diversion, it's much more than that. It's about recognising that each of us has some of the Vicomte or of the Marquise in us, we are all vain and proud and think ourselves superior to the rest. That's why I value this work, because it reminds us of what wretched and capricious creatures we humans can become. This is one of my top 3 favorite books. One of the best epistolary novels ever written, it chronicles the adventures of two courtiers, le ViComte Valmont and Marquise de Merteuil and their manipulative adventures in the world of courtly "love." Spurned by her lover, Merteuil wants to corrupt his finace by having someone take her virginity. Meanwhile, Valmont is insistant of seducing the young and beautiful Mme de Tourvel, a devoted wife. When these two devious seducers make a bet regarding Valmont's success in seducing Tourvel, amorous hell breaks loose, leading to the corruption of more than one innocent. It's a juicy read, full of beautiful people, beautiful language and an adundance of intrigue! no reviews | add a review
Amazon.com Product Description (ISBN 0140441166, Paperback)An epistolary novel chronicles the cruel seduction of a young girl by two ruthless, 18th-century aristocrats.(retrieved from Amazon Fri, 10 Sep 2010 03:49:22 -0400) For the Marquise de Merteuil and the Vicomte de Valmont seduction is a game - the former lovers relish manipulating others to bring amusement to their jaded existences. While Valmont is determined to succeed in his conquest of a virtuous married woman, Merteuil challenges him to seduce an innocent convent girl who is to be married to her former lover. As their intrigues become increasingly duplicitous and they find their human pawns responding in ways they could not have predicted, the consequences prove to be more serious, and deadly, then the two conspirators could have guessed. Depicting decadence and moral corruption in pre-revolutionary France, Dangerous Liaisons (1782) is one of the most scandalous and controversial novels in European literature." "In her introduction, Helen Constantine discusses the amorality of Dangerous Liaisons, its epistolary structure and timeless appeal. This edition also includes a chronology of Laclos's life, works and literary antecedents, suggestions for further reading, and explanatory notes covering the background to the story.… (more) (summary from another edition) |
Google Books — Loading...
Popular coversRatingAverage: (4.12)
![]() Audible.comFive editions of this book were published by Audible.com.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It's a very well put together piece of work, and I appreciate its ambiguities as well -- the translation and accompanying notes are very good. It is, of course, full of horrible people, but I think anyone who knows anything about the book knows that in advance. (