|
Loading... Proust Was a Neuroscientistby Jonah Lehrer
LibraryThing recommendationsMember recommendationsLoading...
won't like
will probably not like
will probably like
will like
will love Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book. Really fascinating book, I think I'll have to go back and listen to the whole thing again. Lehrer brings together so many disparate fields and explains them so clearly. I just loved every chapter but especially those on music and art. He explains why we hate the avante guarde and then learn to love it, why music touches us and so many other things. {This review is being written several months after finishing the book.} The author's main thesis is that many people in the arts "knew" aspects of human nature that are only recently being scientifically proved by neuroscientists. I believe the author makes a very good case and provides many interesting facts and summaries of recent results in neuroscience and also the artists (Whitman, Eliot, Escoffier, Proust, Cezanne Stravinsky, Stein, and Woolf). Thesis is silly. But it's an okay collection of ruminations on science and culture. I think the writer and the readers would be better off if Lehrer hadn't pretended he was making an extended argument about art anticipating science, or whatever. Pros: a very good angle; interesting writing; a broad range of knowledge Cons: it fades off from the middle of each chapter; not much original materials and insights compared to what the author has set off for from the beginning; becoming another history book of the both worlds (art/science) rather than real synergy insights; the attack on pinker and etc. in the last chapter is not convincing at all (the biggest let down of the book). no reviews | add a review
References to this work on external resources.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Book description |
|
(retrieved from Amazon Tue, 05 Jan 2010 12:52:04 -0500)
The first test round has been closed. Visit the Open Shelves Classification group for details.
Quick Links |
Lehrer's goal is to provide more than vignettes of artists interested in the workings of the mind. While not saying anything profoundly new, Lehrer reminds us of the importance of appreciating truth from a range of disciplines. He seeks to free the reader to appreciate the "other" sources as valid, and it is clear that he especially has the scientist in mind when he stretches to show that the artists were "discovering" truths about the mind long ago. Whether Lehrer's particular characters work for the story he seeks to sell is up to the individual reader, but his point is made irregardless.
Overall, a pleasant and informative recasting. ..With a line that should be repeated often: "The one reality science cannot reduce is the only reality we will ever know. This is why we need art." (