|
Loading... So Now Who Do We Vote For?by John Harris
LibraryThing recommendationsMember recommendationsLoading...
won't like
will probably not like
will probably like
will like
will love Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book. no reviews | add a review
References to this work on external resources.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Book description |
|
No descriptions found.
The first test round has been closed. Visit the Open Shelves Classification group for details.
Quick Links |
| Ebooks | Audio | Swap |
| — | — | 3/2 |
I met people that left the Labour party with the first six months because it had sold out! It also reveals that many activists would prefer to be right rather then in power. Meeting activists when their party fails I hear too often that the electorate was fooled or bribed rather then that they had failed to articulate the current experience of people into a vision build on the political values of fairness or choice etc.
Its central weakness for me (and as it was never an intention of the book, unfair for me to say)is that it does not address the reality and the policy options that this creates. Yes you could nationalise the top 100 companies but what would be the impact of this? Yes you could decide to break up the NHS monopoly and gave vouchers to put the power back into the hands of the purchaser but...
I wish we could more grown up discussion of the choices and implications of why PFI rather then direct provision( is it about the national expenditure record, this is not seen as public so the ratio of expenditure to income looks better and so the national economy looks better and so voters fell better. And 25 years means jam now and tears for someone else later)
I have only seen this grown up approach once in recent times on British TV. On NEWSNIGHT (A daily serious current affairs programme on BBC2) to explore the factors behind reviving nuclear power, they assembled the ministers and and the whole range of groups who in an affect gave individual and conflicting policy briefs so that you the audience saw how the ministers tried to make sense of issues that you also struggled to make sense of. (