Murdering McKinley : the making of Theodore Roosevelt's America (edition 2003)

Rauchway’s main point is that, contrary to the contemporaries and historians who have tried to portray him as a madman, Leon Czolgosz was rational. “He said plainly that he shot the President of the United States because he hated the politics of state-supported capitalism that the President and his party represented,” Rauchway says, “and in so doing he echoes hosts of critics in the United States and around the world.” ( )

8

A captivating history on the assassination of President McKinley and all of the characters involved. You also get to learn of the dealings of syphilis, of all things...

"...Of all the US presidential assassinations (there have been four, and every president since Kennedy to George W Bush has had an assassination attempt), Rauchway describes the 1901 assassination of President McKinley by Leon Czolgosz as being the most dangerously politically motivated. Czolgosz was the son of Polish-Russian immigrants and a self-avowed anarchist. Declared insane and executed, Czolgosz’s crime introduced a wave of fear and suspicion of the immigrant working-class in the United States, but at the same time, as Rauchway argues, forced US policy makers to confront some home truths.





President McKinley was assassinated in 1901 by Leon Czolgosz, a self-confessed anarchist, who approached McKinley at the Pan-American Exposition in Buffalo, New York, with his hand wrapped in a handkerchief that concealed a gun. He was immediately apprehended and would have been beaten to death by the crowd had the police not intervened. As he was strapped into the electric chair he made a dramatic, 11th hour statement: ‘I killed the president because he was the enemy of the good people! I did it for the help of the good people, the working men of all countries!’



This book looks at how the subsequent administration of Theodore Roosevelt responded to the assassination and the questions it raised about the working classes and immigrant labour, questions that had never been addressed before. Of course, the assassination also fed into and exacerbated the fear of European anarchists and led to a clampdown on all potentially radical activity. But Rauchway also examines how the McKinley assassination forced opinion makers to confront the question of nature versus nurture, and question whether an increasingly urbanised society contributes to creating troubled citizens. Intriguingly, too, Rauchway looks at how this fed into the anarchists’ idea that capitalism was damaging to the common labourer while benefiting the wealthy few..." (reviewed by Lindsay Porter in FiveBooks).



The full interview is available here: http://fivebooks.com/interviews/lindsay-porter-on-assassination ( )

I liked the concept, but the execution was lacking. The idea is T. Roosevelt and the Progressive movement was driven, and drove, societies viewpoints on insanity and what that implies about societal obligations to correct conditions that create insanity. An intriguing idea, but the author fails to explore it adequately .Nonetheless, an OK read, and brief.