|
Loading...
LibraryThing recommendationsMember recommendationsLoading...
won't like
will probably not like
will probably like
will like
will love Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book. I think Miller is a very poignant and articulate writer. I read "Cancer" a while ago and remember enjoying it more than Capricorn. Although there are truly wonderful observations about life in 1930's New York, the stream-of-conscious narration proved to be too much for me this time around. At about the 208-page mark, I'm putting it back on the shelf. I think Miller is a very poignant and articulate writer. I read "Cancer" a while ago and remember enjoying it more than Capricorn. Although there are truly wonderful observations about life in 1930's New York, the stream-of-conscious narration proved to be too much for me this time around. At about the 208-page mark, I'm putting it back on the shelf. Declaring yourself a genius is fine, but at least provide some evidence of it. Miller is misogynistic (and generally misanthropic), abusive, rude and arrogant. Although I don't think any book should be banned, this one was no great loss. no reviews | add a review
Amazon.com Product Description (ISBN 0802151825, Paperback)Banned in America for almost thirty years because of its explicit sexual content, this companion volume to Miller's Tropic of Cancer chronicles his life in 1920s New York City. Famous for its frank portrayal of life in Brooklyn's ethnic neighborhoods and Miller's outrageous sexual exploits, The Tropic of Capricorn is now considered a cornerstone of modern literature. (retrieved from Amazon Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:57:57 -0400) The first test round has been closed. Visit the Open Shelves Classification group for details. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Miller guided me to other writers--Celine, Knut Hamsun, Anais Nin, Blaise Cendrars, among others--as he did for many others. In my case, out of an inclination toward history, he turned me on to Oswald Spengler, with whom I was so taken that I spent a year reading and rereading Decline of the West, an obsession culminating in an essay that appeared in the old Los Angeles Free Press.
My Capricorn theory: Given evidence that Miller was similarly captivated by Spengler back then, I'm guessing that out of admiration, and the unconscious imitation a writer manifests when encountering an influence--something I know a bit about--Decline of the West interfered with what Henry Miller does best: presenting an adventurous everyday life in flowing, literate, often humorous detail. Which is why, I believe, Capricorn fell down.
Still, certainly not a bad book. (