The authors of this book should, perhaps, stick with architecture and chemistry and leave writing books to others. The overall concept behind Cradle to Cradle is an interesting one, which is what prompted me to pick up this book in the first place. Unfortunately, I found this book incredibly boring, though I managed to struggle through to page 61 before giving up. Life is too short to read boring books! To add insult to injury, the authors have decided to prove their point by publishing their book on some kind of synthetic paper, making a relatively small book incredibly heavy to carry around. Cradle to Cradle will definitely not be making my recommendations list! ( )

Have just finished reading Cradle to Cradle by William McDonough and Michael Braungart. As a reluctant environmentalist, I was very impressed. Living as I do in a small flat, I find that recycling regimes assume you have a garden for lots of separate bins, or a large amount of indoor space to store all your detritus until it gets to the recycling point. In some locales, you are even expected to buy a car to drive to the recycling bins - crazy! Every time you visit someone who has a different recycling regime you have to get used to throwing something out you usually recycle, and saving something, you would have thrown out in another local authority.

For years I have been moaning that everything is the wrong way around: 'Why do they make this so difficult? Why can't they just design things that are easy to recycle, or that can be re-used - this cannot be efficient!' After reading Cradle to Cradle I don't feel so much like a voice in the wilderness. I was impressed with the idea of products being designed with recycling in mind, either as biological or technological 'nutrients', although I wonder how this would work when some products are kept for years? It may be decades before some of these products are ready to be recycled and the system tested.

A lot of the book chronicles the exploits of the authors in their careers as architect and chemist, and by the end I had a mental image of them whizzing about the world solving the world's environmental woes, like environmental Supermen. It would be reassuring to learn that they weren't the only design practitioners trying to save the planet, but perhaps that's another book?

I also wonder what we as a society will leave behind if we really get to grips with recycling? The days of rummaging through waste tips to find antique jam jars and ginger bottles will be a thing of the past, and some artifacts may be lost to history in the urge to re-, down- and up-cycle?

An excellent book. Do the green thing and request it from your local library!

For those to are ecologically minded, a key part of creating any new product is to produce a life cycle assessment (LCA), which is also known as a cradle-to-grave analysis, working from manufacture (‘cradle’) to use and disposal (‘grave’). The LCA investigates all of the environmental impacts of that product and attempts to minimise that damage.One of the key premises of McDonough and Brangart’s Cradle to Cradle is that minimising damage just isn’t good enough. Instead, the authors propose that we change our entire design processes so that reuse and nourishment are built right into the process. Instead of minimising waste, we create value.Cradle to Cradle goes beyond the notion of having recycling as the final step in a process flow, and instead builds on the idea that waste need not exist at all. We can design our lives and products around the notion of nourishment – from the way we live to how we design and produce goods. The natural world provides the template for what the authors suggest, from the regenerative world of the insect, to the cherry tree, to the use of natural nutrients such as solar and wind power. They suggest that the key to working within, rather than against, nature is to respect biodiversity, respect the elegance and abundance of what is around us, and begin our design process with the notion of there is no such thing as waste.The writing style itself is clear, simple, and suitable for all ages and knowledge levels. Different readers will take different things from the book. It is addressed to those that do design for a living, and for those who are professionals in industry, this book will serve as a manual for development.But all of us are engaged in creation and consumption in one way or another (the machine I’m using to type this on, or the reams of paper my kids draw on to take two general examples) and the choices we make on how we will conduct those activities, and seeing ourselves as all being part of the great cradle to cradle cycle is an important step forward. The book spends some time discussing the whole notion of dangerous design principles, including the way in which “downcycling” only defers the problem as products become more and more unstable (and environmental problematic) as they are recycled. Although I’ve yet to see plastic books become a trend, the book itself is an example of how a product can be manufactured in a way that will be infinitely valuable. It’s made out of synthetic paper which doesn’t use wood pulp or any dangerous inks or substances, and is both waterproof and pleasurable to read, with nice thick pages and clear ink. The book goes into quite a lot of detail about what it would mean to design products that weren’t less bad, but rather 100% good. The authors look at architecture and how we can design buildings that take into account the diversity of their settings, and the natural needs of their inhabitants. The book concludes with “Five Steps to Eco-Effectiveness”, a neat summary of how to put the philosophical principles discussed in the book into practice. Some of these, such as “Step 2: Follow informed personal preferences” may seem a little unusual, advocating that we use our aesthetic sense, our observations and our own sense of pleasure (yes, pleasure) to guide our design decisions. While others, such as “Step 4: Reinvent” may seem almost too broad for the average reader. However, the book is full of so many specific examples, primarily from industry, that it’s easy to picture what they are advocating working in practice. After all, the book itself is not only beautifully and safely designed to fit the “cradle-to-cradle” philosophy, it is also written in a way that is easily read, linguistically elegant and appealing, and sound in its advice. As a writer, I can see the sense in taking on this wholistic approach to environmentalism, ditching the hysteria and the mass of finger-pointing practices which look green but which don’t actually make much of a difference, and taking on this approach in a whole body sense. It’s powerful stuff and the impact is starting to happen, perhaps a little too slowly, but, as the authors say, “it’s going to take forever…that’s the point.”

A remarkable and important book. A "must-read", and I don't use that term liberally.
For the rest of my review, see http://www.lukerodgers.ca/2008/09/cra... ( )

mind shifting. must read! ( )

This book explains a lot about how we need to change how we produce things. It isn't a book that gives you a bunch of things you can do to change the world, but it's because how we're recycling and making positive eco-changes isn't enough. It's worth reading, to understand what upcycling is. Or at least read to that chapter.

Want to change the way you look at every thing you own or consider purchasing? Here's how. ( )

The most notable feature of Cradle to Cradle is the book itself. It is not paper, cardboard or newsprint, but rather made entirely of plastic. This provides the reader with a completely waterproof and very durable book which is then fully recyclable when finished. The physical book is an example of what the book teaches: we need to reevaluate and revolutionize current products. Throughout the book, the authors want products that do not just wind up in a landfill after being used, rotting away (a “Cradle to Grave” scenario). The natural resources are used for one product, and then are wasted when thrown away. Instead, the authors envision a system where a product is used by a consumer, then taken back by the manufacturer to be completely reworked as another product. This is called “upcycling” or a “Cradle to Cradle” scenario. Using examples from nature, the authors encourage manufacturers to not simply use organic or “less bad” products and call it “eco-friendly.” Rather, they want the entire manufacturing process (starting with the warehouse/building itself) to be rethought and completely redesigned, in order to make it “eco-efficient.”

Unfortunately, the book focuses too much on the evils of Cradle to Grave products instead of encouraging the reader with ideas for renewable and reusable products. The authors use some examples of “eco-efficient” design, but they are in the minority and scattered throughout the book. Instead of learning all the benefits of new systems, the book takes too much time preaching against the Industrial Revolution and its byproducts. A good book, but comes across as somewhat condemning. ( )

http://www.archidose.org/books/cradle... ( )

this is an absolutely fantastic book that everyone needs to read. it is a critique of our disposable society, but it offers real hope and good ideas for the future. the main premise is that all of the products we use should have a cradle to cradle design, whereas now most have a cradle to grave design. they are not created to be reused. even recycling is not as useful when the product wasn't designed to be reused in that way.
this could change not only the design of everyday products, but the way we use them and see them as a part of our world. ( )

A great perspective on redesigning the way we approach recycling and resources in general. ( )

Find at KCLS: http://catalog.kcls.org/search/i=0865...

Find at Seattle Public Library: https://catalog.spl.org/ipac20/ipac.js...

(From SPL summary:) A manifesto for a radically different philosophy and practice of manufacture and environmentalism "Reduce, reuse, recycle" urge environmentalists; in other words, do more with less in order to minimize damage. As William McDonough and Michael Braungart argue in their provocative, visionary book, however, this approach perpetuates a one-way, "cradle to grave" manufacturing model that dates to the Industrial Revolution and casts off as much as 90 percent of the materials it uses as waste, much of it toxic. Why not challenge the notion that human industry must inevitably damage the natural world? ( )