|
Loading... The Wars of the Rosesby Alison Weir
LibraryThing recommendationsMember recommendationsLoading...
won't like
will probably not like
will probably like
will like
will love Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book. Detailed but fun. It helps to scribble your own genealogical chart as you read thru. Those that think that feminine rule would bring on an era of peace and harmony should follow the moves of Margaret of Anjou and reconsider. ( )The author starts out giving the background of the two families. The she goes on to tell why the War was started. She gives details on the major battles and who perished in them. She gave a little insight to what was going on in each character's head. Here writing was not dry at all, in fact more like a novel than a work of non-fiction. The author research was well done. She gave statements to back up her claims. I have read other works by this author and her histories are never dry. Which has made me a big non-fiction fan. My rating for this novel is 4.5/5 This month I will be starting the sequel to this novel the Princes in the Tower. About the sons of Edward IV. Weir is one of my favorite popular historians for her style: she's straight-forward and clear, gives you all the information you need to understand the subject, but still manages to keep you reading. This book is no exception, but she's not quite as engaging as in, say, her biography of Elizabeth I or Eleanor of Aquitaine. Of course, this could be because this story follows not one person but at least a dozen main characters. It's a little harder to get involved when there's so much happening. Also, I would have preferred that she followed the story through the rise of Henry VII: Weir stops after the restoration of Edward IV, which I suppose was the end of the main conflict between York and Lancaster, but I would have liked for the book to continue with the story of Richard III and his eventual overthrow (this is covered, I believe, in Weir's book The Princes in the Tower). Even with those complaints, I would still highly recommend the book to anyone who would like an overveiw of the Wars of The Roses. The book has made me want to dive into Shakespeare's cycle of histories covering the period and is probably a good historical primer if you want to read those plays with a little background knowledge of the time. Starting off hard to follow with earls and dukes everywhere but getting interesting 80 pages in.. Strictly historical accounts, not dramatic at all. If I was given the choice of writing a novel on a certain historic event, you can bet the event at the bottom of my list would be The War of the Roses. I don't think I could deal with such a convoluted, tangled story, with an ungodly amount of characters to keep track of...it would likely drive me mad. But, thankfully Alison Weir was of a different mindset and took the monster head on. And what a supurb job she did! Weir merged enjoyment and learning expertly and I can see how it would take a lot of work to not have it read as a text book. It was by no means a fast read, as it's all fact and no dialogue, but boring it was not. Nor was it one of those books that feels like a chore to read. Weir starts the novel with the early origins of events that would eventually lead to the thirty-year battle for the throne of England, which dates back to King Edward III. The War of the Roses ends after the Battle of Tewkesbury. The Battle of Tewkesbury, fought on what is now known as Bloody Meadow would be the last meeting between York and Lancaster. The future of Lancaster, Prince Edward, was slain, his father King Henry VI had long been in prison (and shortly after this battle, the grave) and Queen Margaret was in hiding, then imprisoned in the Tower of London and finally ransomed by the King of France. For a woman that spent her a majority of her life surrounded by court and it's many minion and was quite comfortable in the role as a ruler, she lived her last days dependent on the meager funds she received from the King of France and died alone.. TWOTR is a sad note in England's history; sons fought fathers, brothers fought brothers, there was rampant betrayal and lies, lawlessness and violence ruled and havoc was wreaked upon towns, such as Towton. I would recommend this to any history nut! Weir has a great writing style and it was very readable non-fiction. I admit I don't really care for her fiction novels; I thought Innocent Traitor was so-so and I couldn't finish The Lady Elizabeth, but now that I've read this one I'm excited to read the rest of her collection! What I found most interesting (just shows it was more scheming and waiting to see what the other side will do next than actual fighting): "There were, at most, thirteen weeks of fighting in the thirty-two years covered by both of the War of the Roses, while the total time spent campaigning amounted to approximately one year. Some of the battles were short, and non lasted longer than a day." no reviews | add a review
References to this work on external resources.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Book description |
|
(retrieved from Amazon Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:57:57 -0400)
The first test round has been closed. Visit the Open Shelves Classification group for details.
Quick Links |