this book was hard to put down. i was surprised to find that one of the nastiest things in use at our house was a baby shampoo!!

this book made me appreciate how unions have come about--how very basic safety and disclosure of risk rights have had to be fought for.

well worth the time to read. ( )

This is a shocking book that everyone should read, explaining why cancer is so prevalent today, and why the American Cancer Society is more concerned with curing cancer than with preventing it in the first place. It documents how chemical companies were able to keep cancer statistics hidden and unpublished, and did nothing to protect the health of their workers. One set of workers had a 90% incidence of bladder cancer if they worked for years with exposure to benzidine.

Other dangers documented include tetraethyl lead in gas, workers in coke ovens, benzene exposure, cigarettes of course, aspartame, cell phone use and brain tumors (Ted Kennedy maybe?), asbestos, toxic waste cover-ups, dioxin in baby shampoos, vinyl chloride in hairspray, polyvinyl chloride, saran wrap, etc etc. Excellent book, with scientific facts which tell their own story. Scary indeed. ( )

Why is Devra Davis so angy? "The Secret History of the War on Cancer" is Davis's second book detailing her one-person crusade to convince the scientific establishment that cancer is caused by the environment. Like the first ("When Smoke Ran Like Water"), in this new work, Davis leaves a trail of anecdotes intended to be the breadcrumbs that lead us to the conclusion she wants to erect as inevitable. Unfortunately, the bread crumbs are placed too far apart to form a coherent trail. The logical framework that could hold them together is full of holes. Instead, Davis hopes that she can build her case by engendering the reader's moral outrage. This may work for those who already share her opinions. There is no shortage of people who are readily convinced by "evidence" that supports their own views. The skeptical among us need more. Facts and scientific method, for examples.

"The Secret History" reprises many of the arguments Davis has already laid out (as well as reprising her complaints about her career path), offers too little that is new, and ultimately fails to deliver on the promised "secret history." The secret, according to Davis, is that science will not admit that it's the environment that causes cancer. She doesn't seem to care or even acknowledge that perhaps science hasn't "admitted" this because it ain't necessarily so. Over the past 15 years, cancer research has made incredible strides in understanding the biology of cancer at the celluar and molecular levels. It has discovered biological, genetic, and environmental contributors to many forms of cancer, enabling us to intelligently search for treatments. Davis's single-minded attribution of nearly any form of cancer to some known or unknown set of environmental factors is purposefully obstructive, serving to hinder rather than advance understanding.

Throughout this book, Davis presents herself as an angry person, struggling to right some perceived injustices. Some of this is no doubt driven by the understandable grief that comes when friends and loved ones are attacked by a devastating disease. Less understandable is her need to continually work over the slights she feels she has suffered professionally. Her abandonment of the cool logic of science for the emotional and rhetorical heat we see in "The Secret History" may be a strong clue as to just why her career has taken this turn.

Davis presents herself as a crusader. Like many crusaders—Deborah Peel on patient privacy is another example—she is so emotionally attached to her conclusions that she fails to build any solid premises for them. She seems to believe, as other crusaders do, that the conclusion is completely self-evident if only others had eyes to see. What she fails to realize is that what seems obvious to her isn't so obvious to those who do not share her particular confirmation bias.

Devra Davis seems like an intelligent person and one who has certainly witnessed much as an insider to big science. But readers who expect her to dish from her behind-the-scenes perspective will be disappointed here. If you want to know the juicy details of how big money, politics, and strange scientific bedfellows influenced the nation's second-biggest war, you will have to wait. ( )

Well-written, compelling, scary as hell. How money dictates society's priorities. Great case histories, good level of detail. ( )