|
Loading... Not Just a Pretty Face: The Ugly Side of the Beauty Industryby Stacy Malkan
LibraryThing recommendationsMember recommendationsLoading...
won't like
will probably not like
will probably like
will like
will love Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book. no reviews | add a review
References to this work on external resources.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Book description |
|
Lead in lipstick? 1,4 dioxane in baby soap? Coal tar in shampoo? How is this possible? Simple. The $35 billion cosmetics industry is so powerful they’ve kept themselves unregulated for decades. Not Just a Pretty Face chronicles the quest that led a group of health and environmental activists to the world’s largest cosmetics companies to ask some tough questions:
Why do companies market themselves as pink ribbon leaders in the fight against breast cancer, yet use hormone-disrupting and carcinogenic chemicals that may contribute to that very disease?Why do products used by men and women of childbearing age contain chemicals linked to birth defects and infertility?As doors slammed in their faces and the beauty myth peeled away, the industry’s toxic secrets began to emerge. This scathing investigation peels away less-than-lovely layers to expose an industry in dire need of an extreme makeover. The good news is that while the major multinational companies fight for their right to use hazardous chemicals, entrepreneurs are developing safer non-toxic technologies and building businesses on the values of health, justice and personal empowerment.
(retrieved from Amazon Thu, 07 Jan 2010 14:32:04 -0500)
The first test round has been closed. Visit the Open Shelves Classification group for details.
Quick Links |
Malkan also brings up some comforting consumer and environmental movements in the US that are trying to bring light to this subject. I liked how she brought up Breast Cancer "pink ribbon" campaigns and how corporations can somehow whitewash their products by pinning them to a good cause, and how these same companies are actually probably contributing to increased rates of cancer in the first place. I'm glad that she mentioned the great disparity between searching for a cause and seeking prevention - two hugely different things. Prevention is vastly more important, but is often overlooked.
Probably because I just read this book after reading Mindful Economics I was unhappy that the author didn't think to mention anything about probably the biggest reasons that giant corporations aren't changing their product formulas - profits. It's certainly cheaper to keep the toxins they're currently using in their products, and it also profits the chemical and petroleum industries greatly to have these toxins so prevalent in consumer goods.
I also disliked how the author sums up the book with this great promise that science will ultimately lead to product advancements without resorting to the need for toxic chemicals. Maybe because I do scientific research, I'm driven to be quite skeptical about this claim. I think that science can do some great things, but like the potentially toxic nano-particles in lipstick, carcinogenic PTFE, among many other things, a lot of the "great things" that science produces aren't recognized as dangerous until after it's too late. Sometimes there's a lot to be said for old-fashioned, natural products (such as baking soda and vinegar). They've been time tested, and don't kill anyone. Without the proper precautions in place, and without knowing the motivations behind the science, the end results are questionable at best. (