

|
Loading... D-Day June 6 1944: the Climatic Battle of World War II (1994)by Stephen E. Ambrose
A very nice book, based on personal accounts of D-Day participants. Stephen E. Ambrose doesn't hesitate to point out the planning and execution mistakes of the high-level leadership on both sides. Fortunately, for the Allies, the Germans were the most unprepared and disorganized. ( )Where do I begin with a book like this? Imagine watching a scene from high above. Everything is muted and details are fuzzy. Now imagine swooping in to ground level and being able to engage all the senses. You hear, see, smell, taste and feel everything at close range. D-Day is such a book. You know all about June 6th, 1944 from your textbooks and your history classes. With D-Day, June 6th, 1944: the Climactic Battle of World War II Stephen Ambrose swoops in and takes you down the to fighting. Ground level. You get to hear first hand accounts from the American, British and Canadian men who survived Operation Overlord: the five separate attacks from sea and air. The opening chapter is a parachute drop into enemy territory. Soldiers who fought side by side with buddies who later wouldn't make it recall every emotion. What a strange circumstance, to be fighting for your life and watching men die around you and yet have no fear. They knew they could meet death at any minute but were so moved by commanding offices to keep surging forward. The battle at Omaha Beach illustrates this most poignantly. Probably the most interesting section of the book was the comparisons between Commanders Eisenhower and Rommel. They had so many things in common they could have been friends had it not been for their opposing positions in the war. An absolutely priceless piece of research regarding the climactic battle of WWII in June of 1944. Painstakingly researched and told in clear, straightforward prose, Ambrose places us on beaches and in the planning rooms as the battle teeters on the brink of failure. General Omar Bradley nearly calls the men off the beach. His communications are down and the beach is shrouded in smoke so he waits, unaware that most of his armor hasn’t made it to shore, that his officer corps has been decimated, and that it’s his non-coms who have carried the desperate battle to the enemy. A great read and a must for any student of World War II. D-Day is a term I've heard mentioned, discussed, and studied most of my life. Reading this book gave me the basis to truly understand what went into the planning, organization, and implementation of that momentous period. Stephen Ambrose did an excellent job of explaining what went into the planning and orchestration of the invasion. The construction of his book into chapters centered on either an event or a group in action made it easy to understand how each worked, though later it was sometimes harder to understand how each of the groups were working simultaneously, but I don't think it would have been easier to understand in any other construction. I sometimes thought his language was clunky and felt he spent considerably more time on Utah and Omaha Beach than he did on Juno, Gold, and Sword. Perhaps there was more historical material for him to work with on Utah and Omaha than the others, or perhaps he felt they deserved more because the battles were more complicated, but I definitely was aware of a noticeable difference in how they were handled. Otherwise, the book was interesting and informative. A sweeping survey of D-Day and the build-up thereto, well researched and interspersed with telling recollections from veterans. I personally found that it did not quite live up to its billing by reason of its strong American bias - a sub-title "The American Contribution/Perspective" would have given a fairer idea of its content and scope, as the treatment of the US landings at Utah and Omaha beaches is far more extensive than that for the British and Canadians at Juno and Sword. No doubt the author speaks as he finds, but the criticisms of the British seem relatively more trenchant than those of US forces and the author also seems to have picked up on the dislike of Monty that he attributes to Eisenhower and a number of the references to Montgomery in the book are shot through with this. Overall a good book and one I am glad I have read, but some reservations about the treatment of US allies. no reviews | add a review
References to this work on external resources.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Book description |
|
| Haiku summary |
|
(retrieved from Amazon Thu, 14 Feb 2013 13:30:55 -0500)
Drawing on hundreds of oral histories as well as never-before-available information from around the world, Ambrose tells the true story of how the Allies broke through Hitler's Atlantic Wall, revealing that the intricate plan for the invasion had to be abandoned before the first shot was fire. Focusing on the 24 hours of June 6, 1944, D-Day brings to life the stories of the men and women who made history -- from top Allied and Axis strategic commanders to the citizen soldiers whose heroic initiative saved the day. -- container.… (more)
Quick Links |
Google Books — Loading...
(4.11)| 0.5 | |
| 1 | |
| 1.5 | |
| 2 | |
| 2.5 | |
| 3 | |
| 3.5 | |
| 4 | |
| 4.5 | |
| 5 |
Become a LibraryThing Author.