|
Loading... The Lady Elizabeth: A Novelby Alison Weir
LibraryThing recommendationsMember recommendationsLoading...
won't like
will probably not like
will probably like
will like
will love Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book. I read this when it arrived at our library, and I found it to be a great way to dive into Elizabeth's life and the Tudor legacy. Recommended for those trying to get a handle on the Tudors and Henry VIII's heirs. Next step: Tudor Women: Queens and Commoners. I must admit that when I first looked at this book that I had to read for my book club, I was nonplussed. Ugh...it looked long, boring, and stuffy. Then...Weir's magic wrapped me and kept my interest for the next 472 pages. Well-paced, well-written, very satisfying, suspenseful...a masterful job of breathing life into an historical person. Now I can't wait to read/find more about Elizabeth, the Queen. A very readable novel that yet again shows how the events and personalities of Tudor England lend themselves so well to dramatic fictional reconstructions. I was a bit annoyed by Elizabeth's pregnancy here, though had been pre-warned in the historical note at the end that this was a decision of Weir the novelist as opposed to Weir the historian. I have read several of Alison Weir's non-fiction work, and also her first novel, Innocent Traitor. I thought Innocent Traitor was OK, and hoped that her second would be better. Unfortunately, I feel it was worse. I found it quite difficult to read through to the end. The characters are quite wooden, and I didn't find the dialogue believable, particularly at the beginning. Elizabeth as a toddler certainly doesn't act or sound like a toddler! I know she is supposed to be intelligent, but I just couldn't find it believable. The dialogue could also have been a little bit more historically accurate at times (less modern colloquial terms). There are also inaccuracies, which I found disappointing for a historian - Anne Boleyn's necklace was a 'B', not an 'A'. She also did not have a sixth finger; if she had, there is no way that she would have been allowed to (let alone popular at!) the French and English courts. And, sometimes, she is perhaps too accurate - name-dropping titles of books that Elizabeth is reading. Maybe this was to 'set the scene' a litte, but I found it irritating, and felt like the author was showing off her historical knowledge of the period, rather than developing the description or story further. I've not read any other books that do this. Personally, I feel that the subject, for a second novel, was a poor choice, especially as popular Tudor fiction author Philippa Gregory has had one published recently. (And does it better too, in my opinion!) Overall this is quite a clunky, wooden and slow read, and I certainly wouldn't recommend it. I will be avoiding any of Weir's future fiction works. At the beginning of the book, Alison Weir portrays Elizabeth as an extremely precocious child. The book starts out with Elizabeth being not yet even three years old and speaking in highly advanced sentences. That may be possible, but she also has conversations that seems to be way beyond those of a toddler’s grasp of understanding. For example, she says at two and a half years of age: “My lady,” she [Elizabeth] pleaded, “I have asked Sir John why he called me Lady Princess yesterday, and Lady Elizabeth today. Why is that?” Weir states in the reader’s guide at the end of the book that because people did not live long back then, they were expected to grow up fast; therefore, childish behavior and conversations barely existed. The book ends when Elizabeth’s sister, Queen Mary, dies and Elizabeth is to become Queen. Another section of the book that is probably controversial is (again, mentioned in the Reader’s Guide) is Elizabeth’s relationship with Thomas Seymour. Who was Thomas Seymour? Well, most of us know that Henry VIII (Elizabeth’s father) had six wives; the last who was Katherine Parr. When she became widowed after Henry’s death, she married Thomas Seymour. Historically, it was rumored that he had a not-so-innocent interest in Elizabeth and that certain things might have happened between them– including sexual relations. Weir plays up these unsubstantiated reports in this historical fiction book. I was ok with her doing that. Purists may not be. But they are not people who would enjoy historical fiction, probably. When I read historical fiction, I would like the author to at least be educated about the era that he or she is writing about. Weir definitely is an Tudor era expert. She has written several non-fiction books that concern Elizabeth's life and times. no reviews | add a review
References to this work on external resources.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Book description |
|
(retrieved from Amazon Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:58:02 -0400)
The first test round has been closed. Visit the Open Shelves Classification group for details.
Quick Links |