|
Loading... Sundays at Tiffany'sby James Patterson
LibraryThing recommendationsMember recommendationsLoading...
won't like
will probably not like
will probably like
will like
will love Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book. poorly written and poor premise Loved this book such a delight to read. I did not want to put the book down when I started reading it. This book makes you laugh and cry and it does get a little emotional at the end. But I just love this book. This is a terrible book. It starts out sweet and as an interesting idea and quickly spirals downward into an irrational ending. Maybe I'm just not the right audience for this fluffy chick lit, but I read the entire thing in about two hours and it left me intrigued by the original plot idea but annoyed by the actual writing. I loved this book it took me about three hours to read this one. Although I have loved all of his books that I have read. 0.421 seconds to build listing
Amazon.com Product Description (ISBN 031601477X, Hardcover)As a little girl, Jane has no one. Her mother, the powerful head of a Broadway theater company, has no time for her. She does have one friend-a handsome, comforting, funny man named Michael-but only she can see him.Years later, Jane is in her thirties and just as alone as ever. Then she meets Michael again-as handsome, smart and perfect as she remembers him to be. But not even Michael knows the reason they've really been reunited. SUNDAYS AT TIFFANY'S is a love story with an irresistible twist, a novel about the child inside all of us-and the boundary-crossing power of love. (retrieved from Amazon Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:58:09 -0400) The first test round has been closed. Visit the Open Shelves Classification group for details. |
Abebooks |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I read this book easily in an afternoon while recuperating at my mama's. It was an enjoyable read while reading it but after I had finished, I felt dissatisfied by the ending and the story as a whole. It could have been more detailed, less stereotypical characters, and better written. It was not the enjoyable, light read that Patterson's previous two romances were. (