HomeGroupsTalkMoreZeitgeist
This site uses cookies to deliver our services, improve performance, for analytics, and (if not signed in) for advertising. By using LibraryThing you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your use of the site and services is subject to these policies and terms.
Hide this

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

Loading...

Question of Lay Analysis

by Sigmund Freud

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingConversations
1041194,905 (3.43)None
In The Question of Lay Analysis he set forth his views on the issue. The book makes its point energetically and in addition serves as an informal popularization of psychoanalytic ideas.

None.

None
Loading...

Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.

No current Talk conversations about this book.

Should a non-doctor be able to practice psychoanalysis? That is the question Dr. Sigmund Freud, the father of psychoanalysis seeks to answer. The backdrop to this book is a controversy where a non-medical doctor was chosen to perform psychoanalysis in an association.

“The history of civilization, mythology, the psychology of religion and the science of literature...Unless he is well at home in these subjects, an analyst can make nothing of a large amount of his material.” (p. 94)

Freud argues that in some cases, the great mass of medical information a student would learn in med school is useless in the case of psychoanalysis. He isn’t necessarily taught the aforementioned topics that Freud sees as more important.

Freud speculates that doctors disagree with him on this subject because they seek to have an exclusive right to certain practices, a “look at me I’m important” type of attitude. He shows that there is ability and competence in the analysis method irrespective of a medical doctorate. However, he is not arguing that just anyone can read a book and become a psychoanalyst. However, well-read individuals who prove their worth are certainly capable of performing the method without a medical degree.

Freud did not appreciate the charges of quackery being applied to a fellow member who did not have a medical degree. You could figure that perhaps Freud may have been a bit bias and wanted to defend a fellow member of his group, however, Freud’s clear explanations of Psychoanalysis here are valuable. He writes in almost a frustrated tone near the end on how certain individuals have used his analysis, in America specifically, that are so embarrassing Freud says that it would have been better that the analysis would be better off not existing at all.

I think Freud sufficiently answers his critics here and makes a compelling case that psychoanalysis is more than a medical degree. ( )
  TonyLeeRossJr | May 25, 2020 |
no reviews | add a review
You must log in to edit Common Knowledge data.
For more help see the Common Knowledge help page.
Canonical title
Information from the Finnish Common Knowledge. Edit to localize it to your language.
Original title
Alternative titles
Original publication date
People/Characters
Important places
Important events
Related movies
Awards and honors
Epigraph
Dedication
First words
Quotations
Last words
Disambiguation notice
Publisher's editors
Blurbers
Original language
Canonical DDC/MDS

References to this work on external resources.

Wikipedia in English (1)

In The Question of Lay Analysis he set forth his views on the issue. The book makes its point energetically and in addition serves as an informal popularization of psychoanalytic ideas.

No library descriptions found.

Book description
Haiku summary

Quick Links

Popular covers

Rating

Average: (3.43)
0.5
1
1.5
2 1
2.5
3 3
3.5
4 2
4.5
5 1

W.W. Norton

An edition of this book was published by W.W. Norton.

» Publisher information page

Is this you?

Become a LibraryThing Author.

 

About | Contact | Privacy/Terms | Help/FAQs | Blog | Store | APIs | TinyCat | Legacy Libraries | Early Reviewers | Common Knowledge | 151,481,113 books! | Top bar: Always visible