Borg and Wright are an odd pair because they represent distinctly different sides of the debate within Christianity about Jesus’s nature and identity. Borg’s perspective is commonly described as revisionist, while Wright has a more traditional view. In this book, the two scholars take turns sharing their thoughts on Jesus’s divinity, his life, his death, his resurrection, and so on.

What really stands out about this book is how the two men can argue so passionately, but respectfully about things that they take very seriously. The two men argue with firmness and conviction, occasionally making digs at the other’s arguments, but they never get personal or seem angry. In a day when theological discussions about trivial matters quickly disintegrate into back-biting and name-calling, it’s refreshing to see civil discourse about something that, to the Christian, must be of the utmost importance.

So does this book have anything to offer someone who isn’t a theology geek, or even a Christian? I think the best thing that it offers is balance. I know Christians and non-Christians alike who are interested in these questions, but it’s extremely difficult to find literature that takes an unbiased look at what Christians believe about Jesus. By joining forces, Borg and Wright have given readers a good overview of the debate, from the horses’ own mouths. ( )

Excellent debate between N. T. Wright (proponent of a conservative view of Jesus) and Marcus Borg (member of the Jesus Seminar and defender of a moderate perspective). One example of divergences between these two scholars: N. T. Wright argues for the "physical" resurrection of Jesus (there was an empty tomb), while Borg argues for a "spiritual" resurrection (depictions of an empty tomb in the Gospel accounts are late first-century expansions of what the original followers of Jesus actually experienced). Very good book for anyone who likes to dialogue with writers approaching religious subjects from a different perspective.

This was a wonderful book that showcased two wonderful minds that can truly get the message of Christ while disagreeing on several theological issues. They handle this really well, letting the reader know that they fully disagree at times, but can remain friends and still respect each other. I wish this spirit was more prevalent among other Christian writers and that more would have the willingness to take on projects like this. ( )

Excellent scholarly discussion of the impact of Jesus Christ in the modern post-Christian era, focusing particularly on his lasting relevance to all people in all times. ( )

This is a lively and interesting debate between two scholars who differ (but are good friends) on major issues in Historical Jesus study. It is a very helpful introduction to the conversation. ( )