Hide this

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

The Last of the Mohicans by James Fenimore…

The Last of the Mohicans (original 1826; edition 2011)

by James Fenimore Cooper

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingMentions
6,765None543 (3.5)144
Title:The Last of the Mohicans
Authors:James Fenimore Cooper
Info:Simon & Brown (2011), Paperback, 508 pages
Collections:Read, Currently reading, Read but unowned

Work details

The Last of the Mohicans by James Fenimore Cooper (1826)



Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.

No current Talk conversations about this book.

» See also 144 mentions

English (54)  Spanish (2)  All languages (56)
Showing 1-5 of 54 (next | show all)
No date, but the Sandglass refers to the illustrator dying in 1970. One ABEBooks dealer says it was printed in the mid to late 1970s so I've listed it as 1977.
  SteveJohnson | Jan 31, 2014 |
The Last of the Mohicans
by James Fenimore Cooper
Published 1826
Pages: 416
Genre: Fiction, historical romance
My copy: kindle/☊, narrated by Larry McKeever.
Rating ★ ★ ★ 1/2

Story of the Seven Year War of 1757. Frontiersman, Hawkeye and his Native American friend Uncas, along with David Gamut, the singing teacher, and Major Duncan Heyward, the group's military leader set off to rescue the two Munro sisters who have been taken captive. This author is one of the first to include Native American's in his writing and he does a good job of respecting their culture. There is the suggestion of interracial marriage in the story which would have been quite controversial and maybe also was the reason for his popularity. I think his book might have been one of the very first to make this suggestion. While it is a historical novel and also a novel about a people, there are some inaccuracies. The author's prose is not easy to read. Audio made it better and McKeever had a fine voice but the quality of the audio was poor. I had an echo and also the transitions were quite obvious. Twain criticized Cooper as being a spendthrift as far as his use of words. ( )
  Kristelh | Nov 16, 2013 |
This is a difficult book to read. I only read it because I loved the moive "Lat of the Mohicans" with Daniel Day Lewis. The really interesting part is that some threads of the original are present in the movie. Some of the best lines in the movies are actually taken from the book. ( )
  bcrowl399 | Aug 15, 2013 |
The Year: 1757.
The Place: A vast, unspoiled wilderness that would now be called upstate New York.
The Book: Exciting in fits and starts, but generally a bit slow.

This book took me forever to read, not because it was especially long, but just because it dragged. Reading it shortly after Neal Stephenson's [b:Reamde|10552338|Reamde|Neal Stephenson|http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1305993115s/10552338.jpg|15458989], which was so riveting that I was reading it late at night and sneaking a few pages during breaks at work, it's probably unfair to hold this early 19th century work to the same standard.

The action scenes were actually very well done - far better, in terms of pacing and description, than contemporary works such as the plodding [b:Frankenstein|18490|Frankenstein|Mary Shelley|http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1311647465s/18490.jpg|4836639]. And many of the characters (the male ones, anyway) are fantastic: Magua is legitimately menacing, Hawkeye likable, and Duncan frustrating-yet-admirable. Unfortunately, the female characters are fainting, two-dimensional rescue bait, to the point that one of them spends literally half the book being physically carried around over the bad guy's shoulder.

In addition, this book definitely shares the downfall of a lot of early 19th century fiction, that of overly flowery, elegant, and inauthentic-sounding dialogue. Too often, conversations in the book come off like correspondence, as even these supposed "men of action," in the middle of stressful situations, trade long, eloquently composed aphorisms. As a 21st century reader who's been through a lot of Elmore Leonard and Stephen King, it's hard for me to swallow.

I don't regret reading this book, but in hindsight, I probably only finished it because of its historical significance; I would have quit reading a modern novel that bogged down so badly. ( )
1 vote benjamin.duffy | Jul 28, 2013 |
Let me start by saying, I hate when I watch a movie adapted from a book BEFORE I read the book, and it’s completely different, so while I’m reading the book, I’m expecting things to happen that never do. If you have any inclination to read this book at some time in the near or distant future, do not, and I repeat, do NOT, watch the Daniel Day Lewis movie first. Talk about artistic liberties, geez.

Disclaimer: I was an English Literature major and considering my schooling isn’t yet so very far behind me, this will probably sound like an essay, but bear with me, I’m working on it!

So, The Last of the Mohicans. It’s always strange to go from reading contemporary literature (the last book I read was Stephen King’s It) to classic early American or British literature. Just the difference in language and pace is staggering. Staged during the French and Indian War in the still unbelievably dense and beautiful American woodlands, the language of this novel follows the style of the Romantics. With stunning descriptions of Nature, the reader inevitably finds herself imagining an America long gone. One in which, as it’s said, a squirrel could cross the entire continental U.S. solely by going from tree to tree. The endlessness of the wilderness, of which the Native populations seem only an extension, is breathtaking and, to a generation soiled by deforestation, global warming, and unbelievably decimated Native populations, nostalgic. However, as much as I enjoy writing from this time period (this novel was first published in 1826), I sometimes feel that the profusion of flowery language somewhat hampers the freedom of my imagination. It’s as though I have to wade through a sea of adjectives before I arrive at the splendid manifestations of Nature previously mentioned.

On a superficial level, it would be easy to accuse Cooper of allowing his characters to fall into rather stereotypical archetypes. At least, that’s the impression I had when I first starting getting into the real action of the story. Following the course of any elementary English class, it’s easy to see that the conflict here is “civilization” vs. nature, the latter of which, again, includes the Native Americans. “Civilization”, of course, referring to the white settlers, and in this case, the “civilized” characteristics of the scout, Chingachgook, and Uncas, with “nature” referring to the wild setting of the action, but more importantly, to the savagery and bloodthirsty actions of the Hurons, but most specifically, of Magua.

The first characters to whom we are introduced (and the characters whom the Daniel Day Lewis movie would have you falsely believing to be the main characters) are Cora and Alice Munro: two young, white women who seem to embody every physical and spiritual virtue one could possibly possess. In a novel where the color of skin plays an enormous part, the virtues of these two young women are constantly compared to the purity of their skin. In fact, most of the “white” characters, with the exception of the execrable French, seem to embody all the most admirable and honorable of traits. Duncan Heyward, the girls’ almost constant companion and protector, epitomizes chivalry and honor and is continually described as an asset to his race. He is even compared to “a knight of ancient chivalry, holding his midnight vigils before the tent of a recaptured princess, whose favor he did not despair of gaining” (150). Even the scout, Hawkeye, who constantly refers to himself as “a man without a cross” is a character of infallible morality and honor. By “man without a cross”, the scout wishes to identify himself as belonging to no one race or religion. As a white man whose parents were killed in an Indian raid and subsequently raised by the Mohicans, he is neither wholly white nor wholly native, but rather a figure common to literature of the time, that of the frontiersman or woodsman. He is caught in a cultural limbo, so to speak.

The difference between the descriptions of the white characters and those of the Natives is stark and obvious, and yet there is a definite division between certain tribes and others. Chingachgook and Uncas, my personal favorite character, are the last two remaining members of the venerable Mohican race, and the latter, the titular character. These two natives are preliminarily described, with rather a tone of surprise in my opinion, as worthy of note for their virtue, honor, and admirable character. At first glance, I felt the descriptions of these two characters was rather patronizing as can be seen from this passage from page 132: “and Uncas stood, fresh and blood-stained from the combat, a calm, and, apparently, an unmoved looker-on, it is true, but with eyes that had already lost their fierceness, and were beaming with a sympathy that elevated him far above the intelligence, and advanced him probably centuries before the practices of his nation.” This description is of Uncas’ reaction to the tearful reunion of the Munro sisters after their near fatal experience with Magua and the Hurons atop the hillock before the surprise interference of Heyward, Hawkeye, and his two Mohican companions. If ever there was a backhanded compliment, this must be it. Throughout this novel, although mostly directed at the Hurons, the Indians are described as unfeeling and coldhearted, literally incapable of the delicacies of sentiment of a “white” heart.

The Hurons, and Magua, or “Le Renard Subtil”, especially, garner the most bleak and dehumanizing descriptions from the author. The memorably gory massacre at the surrender of William Henry is a perfect example. Magua and the other Hurons, who are the slaughterers in this scene, are described as savage, cold, heartless, brutal, and prone to violence. In other words, in almost every sense the polar opposites of the whites, and, to a lesser degree, the two Mohicans. In every instance, they are given derogatory and dehumanizing labels and action to support them. Their separation from the humanity of the whites is shown at the massacre of the women and children at William Henry: “The flow of blood might be likened to the outbreaking of a torrent; and, as the natives became heated and maddened by the sight, many among them even kneeled to the earth, and drank freely, exultingly, hellishly, of the crimson tide” (208). As in this last scene, there is much in the way of Christian distinctions between good and evil in this novel. The women are often compared to angels, Heyward, to a holy knight of old, and, as just seen, the Hurons to hellish imps and devils who delight in bloodshed and misery, even going so far as to call Magua the “Prince of Darkness.”

The issue of color is obvious in this story, but not so obvious is its intention. There are many subtleties of plot that suggest the author may not be as prejudiced as at first glance he may seem. The attitude of the colonizers, and the settlers that came after them (that would be us, faithful reader!), towards the Native populations has always been characterized by a tendency to relegate them to the threatening realm of the “other.” But as the plot unravels and the characters develop further, the definite boundaries between the races begin to blend. Ever present is the scout, who can not easily be placed with either the Whites or the Natives. Always eager to remind the rest that he is “a man without a cross”, Hawkeye serves as a kind of bridge between the two, being neither wholly separate nor wholly a part of either one. Also, although very subtly hinted at, there seems to be an attraction between the arguable hero of the story, Uncas, and Cora. At the end, during the funeral for the two (which is my favorite part of the story owing to the beauty of the scene), the mourners allude to the fact that Uncas had eyes for none of the Delaware women but sacrificed himself to avenge Cora’s death, and they sing of their meeting in the Happy Hunting Grounds. Always a knotty issue, race is, but I have to argue that Cooper was much more for equality of the races, although he definitely had an idea of Bad Indian vs. Good Indian.

Did I make this sound like a literature essay? I think I did, and I apologize. Sometimes it’s hard to separate our training from our creative expression, isn’t it, Best Beloved? In any case, I very much enjoyed this book, and greatly disliked the Daniel Day Lewis movie. I hate when producers take classic novels and tweak the plot in order to Hollywood-ize it. I mean, a love triangle between the Scout, Cora, and Heyward? Totally uncalled for.

For more book reviews (err... book musings?), including a Venison stew and whiskey cocktail dinner, visit my blog For Love and Allegory at http://www.forloveandallegory.wordpress.com/ ( )
  stixnstones004 | Jun 21, 2013 |
Showing 1-5 of 54 (next | show all)
no reviews | add a review

» Add other authors (127 possible)

Author nameRoleType of authorWork?Status
James Fenimore Cooperprimary authorall editionsconfirmed
Churchwell, SarahIntroductionsecondary authorsome editionsconfirmed
Dean, Robertson.Narratorsecondary authorsome editionsconfirmed
Guthrie, A. B., Jr.Introductionsecondary authorsome editionsconfirmed
Hunt, RobertIllustratorsecondary authorsome editionsconfirmed
Lehtonen, J. V.Translatorsecondary authorsome editionsconfirmed
McKeever, LarryNarratorsecondary authorsome editionsconfirmed
Weideman, BillNarratorsecondary authorsome editionsconfirmed
Wilson, Edward ArthurIllustratorsecondary authorsome editionsconfirmed
Wyeth, N.C.Illustratorsecondary authorsome editionsconfirmed
You must log in to edit Common Knowledge data.
For more help see the Common Knowledge help page.
Series (with order)
Canonical title
Original title
Alternative titles
Original publication date
Important places
Important events
Related movies
Awards and honors
Mislike me not, for my complexion,
The shadowed livery of the burnished sun.

The Merchant of Venice, II.i.1-2
First words
It was a feature peculiar to the colonial wars of North America, that the toils and dangers of the wilderness were to be encountered before the adverse hosts could meet. A wide and apparently an impervious boundary of forests severed the possessions of the hostile provinces of France and England. The hardy colonist, and the trained European who fought at his side, frequently expended months in struggling against the rapids of the streams, or in effecting the rugged passes of the mountains, in quest of an opportunity to exhibit their courage in a more martial conflict. But, emulating the patience and self-denial of the practiced native warriors, they learned to overcome every difficulty; and it would seem that, in time, there was no recess of the woods so dark, nor any secret place so lovely, that it might claim exemption from the inroads of those who had pledged their blood to satiate their vengeance, or to uphold the cold and selfish policy of the distant monarchs of Europe.
Last words
(Click to show. Warning: May contain spoilers.)
Disambiguation notice
This is the main work for the original book, The Last of the Mohicans, by James Fenimore Cooper. It should not be combined with any adaptation (e.g., the movie of the same name), abridgement, etc.
Publisher's editors
Information from the Spanish Common Knowledge. Edit to localize it to the English one.
Publisher series

References to this work on external resources.

Wikipedia in English (4)

Book description
Haiku summary

Amazon.com Product Description (ISBN 0553213296, Mass Market Paperback)

The wild rush of action in this classic frontier adventure story has made The Last of the Mohicans the most popular of James Fenimore Cooper’s Leatherstocking Tales. Deep in the forests of upper New York State, the brave woodsman Hawkeye (Natty Bumppo) and his loyal Mohican friends Chingachgook and Uncas become embroiled in the bloody battles of the French and Indian War. The abduction of the beautiful Munro sisters by hostile savages, the treachery of the renegade brave Magua, the ambush of innocent settlers, and the thrilling events that lead to the final tragic confrontation between rival war parties create an unforgettable, spine-tingling picture of life on the frontier. And as the idyllic wilderness gives way to the forces of civilization, the novel presents a moving portrayal of a vanishing race and the end of its way of life in the great American forests.

(retrieved from Amazon Mon, 30 Sep 2013 13:30:07 -0400)

(see all 6 descriptions)

A Mohican brave struggles to protect two English girls from an evil Huron during the French and Indian War in upstate New York.

(summary from another edition)

» see all 25 descriptions

Quick Links

Popular covers


Average: (3.5)
0.5 3
1 31
1.5 8
2 86
2.5 32
3 236
3.5 66
4 275
4.5 31
5 143


Twenty editions of this book were published by Audible.com.

See editions

Penguin Australia

An edition of this book was published by Penguin Australia.

» Publisher information page

Is this you?

Become a LibraryThing Author.


Help/FAQs | About | Privacy/Terms | Blog | Contact | LibraryThing.com | APIs | WikiThing | Common Knowledge | Legacy Libraries | Early Reviewers | 89,473,257 books! | Top bar: Always visible