|
Loading... Aristotle and an Aardvark Go to Washingtonby Thomas Cathcart
LibraryThing recommendationsMember recommendationsLoading...
won't like
will probably not like
will probably like
will like
will love Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book. Cathcart and Klein wrote this book to follow up on their first collaboration, Plato and a Platypus Walk into a Bar. The treatment here is similar, except that the authors loosely address political speech instead of philosophy. They do this by the rules of Aristotelian logic, sort of. There aren't as many jokes as in the first book, and their political bias (anti-Bush) is outdated. I enjoyed this book, but less than their first. ( )This "sequel" was not nearly as good, funny, or entertaining as "Plato and a Platypus Walk into a Bar," the authors' original venture into humor/philosophy. Bad political jokes are used as examples to explain logical fallacies. Mildly entertaining, but only if you are current on American Politics in George W.'s administration. I thought the author spent far too much time espousing his personal political views. Plato and a Platypus was a much better book, unlike Aristotle and an Ardvark, I couldn't put it down. This one I could hardly finish and I'm not even a conservative. An examination of political thought through jokes. this is a sequel to the same authors book "Plato and a Platypus". 0.071 seconds to build listing no reviews | add a review
Amazon.com Product Description (ISBN 0810995417, Hardcover)Thomas Cathcart and Daniel Klein, authors of the national bestseller Plato and a Platypus Walk into a Bar, aren’t falling for any election year claptrap—and they don’t want their readers to either! In Aristotle and an Aardvark Go to Washington, our two favorite philosopher-comedians return just in time to save us from the double-speak, flim-flam, and alternate reality of politics in America. Deploying jokes and cartoon as well as the occasional insight from Aristotle and his peers, Cathcart and Klein explain what politicos are up to when they state: “The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence.” (Donald Rumsfeld), “It depends on what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is.” (Bill Clinton), or even, “We hold these truths to be self-evident…” (Thomas Jefferson, et al). Drawing from the pronouncements of everyone from Caesar to Condoleeza Rice, Genghis Kahn to Hillary Clinton, and Adolf Hitler to Al Sharpton. Cathcart and Klein help us learn to identify tricks such as “The Texas Sharpshooter Fallacy” (non causa pro causa) and the “The Fallacy Fallacy” (argumentum and logicam). Aristotle and an Aardvark is for anyone who ever felt like the politicos and pundits were speaking Greek. At least Cathcart and Klein provide the Latin name for it (raudatio publica)! (retrieved from Amazon Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:58:05 -0400) The first test round has been closed. Visit the Open Shelves Classification group for details. |
Abebooks |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||