HomeGroupsTalkZeitgeist
This site uses cookies to deliver our services, improve performance, for analytics, and (if not signed in) for advertising. By using LibraryThing you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your use of the site and services is subject to these policies and terms.
Hide this

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

It Must Be Beautiful: Great Equations of…
Loading...

It Must Be Beautiful: Great Equations of Modern Science

by Graham Farmelo

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingConversations
302356,697 (3.43)None

None.

Loading...

Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.

No current Talk conversations about this book.

Showing 3 of 3
This is a 'math appreciation' book for non-mathematicians. Good equations are beautiful (though not all beautiful equations are good). Each chapter is written by an eminent author about an equation that is particularly beautiful in its own right, as well as being the bedrock of that particular field of study.
  ewrinc | Nov 23, 2007 |
Really good chapters on the central equations of the quantization of light (Planck-Einstein), special relativity (Einstein), general relativity (Einstein), quantum mechanics (Schrödinger), quantum field theory (Dirac), information theory (Shannon), unification of forces (Yang-Mills), search for extraterrestrial intelligence (Drake), biology (Kimura), chaos theory (logistic map), chemistry of ozone breakdown (Molina-Rowland).
  fpagan | Dec 22, 2006 |
This seems like a good idea, a book of essays on various important equations in science, but as I've now grown to expect, the execution is ruined through the authors being terrified of actually using any math in their essays.

Really the only useful thing to come out of it was some throwaway lines by Frank Wilczek on why the hole interpretation of the Dirac equation is untenable.
(His two important points are,
first, that fields that are not described by the Dirac equation [he does not explicitly say bosons, but I am sure that's what he meant] also have anti-particles, and
second, and this point I had missed in my own musings on the subject, non-QED interactions, like neutron decay, can create a single electron or positron, as opposed to an electron-hole pair.)
But even he doesn't give a useful description of particles vs anti-particles in terms of how the complex phase rotates with time. ( )
  name99 | Nov 14, 2006 |
Showing 3 of 3
no reviews | add a review
You must log in to edit Common Knowledge data.
For more help see the Common Knowledge help page.
Series (with order)
Canonical title
Original title
Alternative titles
Original publication date
People/Characters
Important places
Important events
Related movies
Awards and honors
Epigraph
Dedication
First words
Quotations
Last words
Disambiguation notice
Publisher's editors
Blurbers
Publisher series
Original language
Canonical DDC/MDS

References to this work on external resources.

Wikipedia in English

None

Book description
Haiku summary

No descriptions found.

A series of essays on the most famous equations of modern science by experts in their fields.

Quick Links

Popular covers

Rating

Average: (3.43)
0.5
1 1
1.5
2
2.5
3 10
3.5 3
4 6
4.5
5 2

Is this you?

Become a LibraryThing Author.

 

About | Contact | Privacy/Terms | Help/FAQs | Blog | Store | APIs | TinyCat | Legacy Libraries | Early Reviewers | Common Knowledge | 137,272,937 books! | Top bar: Always visible