|
Loading...
LibraryThing recommendationsMember recommendationsLoading...
won't like
will probably not like
will probably like
will like
will love Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book. I dig Žižek, I really do, but Violence wasn’t cutting it for me. He’s easy to follow once you get his thought process down, but there were times where he was just trying too hard to make connections – jumping from Christianity, to Monty Python, to Freud…I mean, c’mon. Everything was connected but the segue’s weren’t the prettiest or most direct. Still an interesting read though, so I suggest picking it up if social commentary is your bag – otherwise, you’re not missing out on anything. no reviews | add a review
References to this work on external resources.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Book description |
|
Philosopher, cultural critic, and agent provocateur Slavoj Žižek constructs a fascinating new framework to look at the forces of violence in our world.
Using history, philosophy, books, movies, Lacanian psychiatry, and jokes, Slavoj Žižek examines the ways we perceive and misperceive violence. Drawing from his unique cultural vision, Žižek brings new light to the Paris riots of 2005; he questions the permissiveness of violence in philanthropy; in daring terms, he reflects on the powerful image and determination of contemporary terrorists.
Violence, Žižek states, takes three forms--subjective (crime, terror), objective (racism, hate-speech, discrimination), and systemic (the catastrophic effects of economic and political systems)--and often one form of violence blunts our ability to see the others, raising complicated questions.
Does the advent of capitalism and, indeed, civilization cause more violence than it prevents? Is there violence in the simple idea of "the neighbour"? And could the appropriate form of action against violence today simply be to contemplate, to think?
Beginning with these and other equally contemplative questions, Žižek discusses the inherent violence of globalization, capitalism, fundamentalism, and language, in a work that will confirm his standing as one of our most erudite and incendiary modern thinkers.
(retrieved from Amazon Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:58:08 -0400)
The first test round has been closed. Visit the Open Shelves Classification group for details.
Quick Links |
I liked the book in total, and the fact that he outlines how violence self-perpetuates in different modes, but he eventually starts to ramble. For example, his "clarification" of Benjamin's concept of Divine Violence is just as confusing/non-explanatory as Benjamin's passage that's quoted. Then he goes on to explain how that's liberatory violence, without explaining the internal portions of that violence.
In the end, I like how Zizek writes, and he makes good points, but they are equated by some really terrible, or simply unexplained, ones. (