The Spy Who Came in From the Cold (1963)

This was an ok spy story, but good enought to be one of the books on the list of 1001 books to read before you die?? This bothered me enough to pull out the 1001 book to see why this one was chosen. The reason it gives, is that this book elevates itself from the usual thriller because the spy is betrayed by his own country. Isn't it sad that in 1963 when this book was written that the concept of your own country abandoning you is so unusual that everyone should read this book? Yikes - we've become pretty cynical... ( )

For me the most satisfying aspect of the book was its function as a time capsule of the cold war. I also enjoyed the twists and turns, the deceptions, the plots within plots, but somehow I felt a bit undernourished by the end. Bad people died, good people died, it didn't amount to much of anything. Sure, that was his point, but, um, meh.

I didnot like this book and did not enjoy reading it. ( )

The first time I became interested in John le Carré's work was when Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy with Benedict Cumberbatch was advertised prior to its release. I'm a huge fan of Cumberbatch (or The Batch, as he is affectionately known) whose Sherlock won me over, and curious about the movie I suggested the book for my book club's reading list. Majority asked for a more famous novel by le Carré so here we are.
It is easy to understand why this book has stood the test of time: it is a fast-paced, intelligent, emotionally-engaging thriller with characters who are easy to care about and even the shift of perspective from what I would describe as "inner circle third person" to "outsider third person", which was quite obvious, didn't change that. I think le Carre employed this device to hide certain things from the reader without making Leamas an unreliable narrator. He was counting on the reader to figure out what was really happening as the novel progressed and with the little hints along the way it wasn't that hard. The book could've become boring at that point considering that the action isn't in chases or gun-fights but in a steady execution of the plan, but le Carre had an ace up his sleeve. With the perspective back to "inner circle third person" the reader got to realize along with Leamas that he wasn't as inner circle as he thought he was. A three-level conspiracy, my friends, how delicious is that?! I won't say more for the sake of not spoiling the ending, but you see how this book is never exactly what it seems at first, with characters pursuing secret agendas to the very end.
Written in the middle of the Cold War and being a spy thriller it is no surprise that this book pits characters who are both physically and figuratively on different sides of the Berlin wall against each other. Le Carre talks ideology here and doesn't leave any room for doubt as to which side he is on. I don't know how historically accurate the details are and the year on the calendar didn't allow for ambiguity if one wanted to be published and widely read, but the fact remains. While there aren't any gray areas as far as le Carre's and Leamas' allegiances go there are plenty of them in the rest of the novel. I suppose it is like that in the business of spying where the ends justify whatever means necessary. As Leamas said, the only criteria of success is results, and ethics are sacrificed at every turn.
The most memorable and thought-provoking character for me was Liz, particularly because little about her is straightforward. She is young, naive and idealistic but she is locked in a gray area even more so than the spies who've made it their home. She belongs to the Communist Party yet she dislikes its everyday defining characteristics, she sees a socialist state first-hand yet she doesn't question her beliefs, she rejects the capitalist ideals yet she is devoted to a man who is as ideologically far from her as possible. She gives the depth and the heart to this novel, particularly by showing Leamas the man underneath the mask of the spy and making the reader care for those who at the end of the day are collateral in the game of politics.
This book was published almost 40 years ago and is set even earlier but it doesn't read as dated. In fact, if I didn't know when it was written I would've taken it for a historical spy thriller. Now I'm even more curious about Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy because I am confident that le Carre knows what he is doing so expect to see me talking about it here at some point in the future. ( )

Carré is a fine writer - and the first half of this novel works very well. The whole set up - a man who is thrown out of the british intelligence agency and left unwanted, disgraced - but the agency have secrets plans with him - he's to be recruited by the enemy behind the Iron Curtain and thereby working as a double, well triple-agent. The best part of the story is when he meets a girl who's a communist and they fall in love. Impossible love, we know, but it's very well told.

But once he gets recruited and going to Germany the novel's last part ends up in some lengthy and overly detailed interrogation that seemed, well, not that believable to me.

Also the whole story becomes a little too muddy and confusing with all the double-and-triple-agent stuff. I know that's Carré's mission - to tell us that those who's going to protect us is just as corrupted as the enemy - everything is blurred and mixed up, you can't trust anyone, there are no real heroes. The ending is of course just a reflection of this whole thing. ( )