HomeGroupsTalkMoreZeitgeist
Search Site
This site uses cookies to deliver our services, improve performance, for analytics, and (if not signed in) for advertising. By using LibraryThing you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your use of the site and services is subject to these policies and terms.

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

Warrant: The Current Debate by Alvin…
Loading...

Warrant: The Current Debate (edition 1993)

by Alvin Plantinga

Series: Gifford Lectures (1987-1988)

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingMentions
1431190,876 (4.5)5
Contemporary epistemologists seldom focus attention on the nature of warrant; and when they do, they display deplorable diversity. The author argues that none of their claims is correct, and suggests a more satisfactory alternative. He surveys current contributions to the discussion of warrant and neighbouring issues.… (more)
Member:ralphwedgwood
Title:Warrant: The Current Debate
Authors:Alvin Plantinga
Info:Oxford University Press, USA (1993), Paperback, 240 pages
Collections:Your library
Rating:
Tags:None

Work Information

Warrant: The Current Debate by Alvin Plantinga

Loading...

Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.

No current Talk conversations about this book.

» See also 5 mentions

Where to begin? This book is the first of a classic trilogy by renowned American philosopher Alvin Plantinga. The trilogy concerns what, exactly, is required in order to actually know something. Knowledge must be at least true belief, but it must also be more than that; whatever this mysterious extra element is, we might call it 'warrant'. In this volume, Plantinga examines a wide variety of historical and contemporary theories on what might suffice for 'warrant', and systematically rebuts all of them – mostly because none of them can deal adequately with situations where our brains just aren't working as they should. Plantinga is fond of using delightfully bizarre thought experiments, many of which involve bizarre experiments performed on humans by scientists from Alpha Centauri. These are the fun bits that enabled me to get through what was otherwise a very dry book. (Nor could a book of this sort be anything but dry, so one mustn't fault Plantinga in any way for that.) Still, it's given me a lot to think about, and I hope to get around to reading the other two volumes later on. ( )
1 vote jbfideidefensor | May 28, 2011 |
no reviews | add a review

Belongs to Series

Gifford Lectures (1987-1988)
You must log in to edit Common Knowledge data.
For more help see the Common Knowledge help page.
Canonical title
Original title
Alternative titles
Original publication date
People/Characters
Important places
Important events
Related movies
Epigraph
Dedication
First words
Quotations
Last words
Disambiguation notice
Publisher's editors
Blurbers
Original language
Canonical DDC/MDS
Canonical LCC

References to this work on external resources.

Wikipedia in English

None

Contemporary epistemologists seldom focus attention on the nature of warrant; and when they do, they display deplorable diversity. The author argues that none of their claims is correct, and suggests a more satisfactory alternative. He surveys current contributions to the discussion of warrant and neighbouring issues.

No library descriptions found.

Book description
Haiku summary

Current Discussions

None

Popular covers

Quick Links

Rating

Average: (4.5)
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4 6
4.5 1
5 6

Is this you?

Become a LibraryThing Author.

 

About | Contact | Privacy/Terms | Help/FAQs | Blog | Store | APIs | TinyCat | Legacy Libraries | Early Reviewers | Common Knowledge | 204,502,786 books! | Top bar: Always visible