Hide this

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

Charles Fort: The Man Who Invented the…

Charles Fort: The Man Who Invented the Supernatural (2008)

by Jim Steinmeyer

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingMentions
125596,356 (3.88)3

Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.

No current Talk conversations about this book.

» See also 3 mentions

Showing 5 of 5
Great bio of a far more interesting person than I'd expected.

If nothing else, the world owes Charles Fort for having coined the term "teleportation." ( )
  SESchend | Sep 6, 2017 |
Fort was a fascinating character. This biography is far more readable than any of Fort's actual books. Interesting and just the right length. I was surprised to learn that Fort was reporting a great deal with his tongue in his cheek. I always thought he was a great big crank. Turns out that's not true. Odd, yes. But crazy? No. There's also a lot of information about Theodore Dreiser here, as he was more or less Fort's mentor. And H. G. Wells provides background snark, as does Mencken. The book is pretty light on recitations of weird phenomena, which is okay by me. ( )
  satyridae | Apr 5, 2013 |
Charles Fort was an American writer, a connoisseur of unexplained phenomena, like frogs raining down from the sky: whence the adjective 'fortean'. A sceptic regarding science as well as religion, he wrote:

Darwinism of course was never proved: The fittest survive. What is meant by the fittest? Not the strongest; not the cleverest – Weakness and stupidity everywhere survive. There is no way of determining fitness except in that a thing does survive. "Fitness", then, is only another name for "survival." Darwinism: That survivors survive."

Steinmeyer did an excellent job in piecing together what little is known about the man into a very readable and informative biography. Being British, I found the material about Fort's background very helpful. ( )
  leontes47 | Nov 21, 2012 |
The title of this book sugests Charles Fort invented the Supernatural; as if he came up with the strange stories in the manuscript. He didn't actually invent the Supernatural, he just brought it to the American consciousness. Through in depth research of all the sciences, done at the New York Public Library, The British Museum, and from newspaper articles, he collected strange accounts and compiled them into four different books starting with "The Book of The Damned" in 1920. He presented the material in a humorous way that said "make of it what you will." Fort despised Scientists and Theologians and came up with his own wacky cosmology. He coined the term teleportation and brought to light such phenomena as frogs falling from the sky, unexplained flying objects, spontainious human combustion, and the mysteries of Kaspar Hauser, and The Mary Celeste. Without him we wouldn't have television shows like "In Search of", "Unexplained Mysteries", and "The X-Files."

In modern times we would say Charles Fort was a victim of an abusive father, but in Victorian days his upbringing was just considered strict. When Charles or his two younger brothers were punished they were usually beaten. When beatings no longer worked, they were locked in the cellar without food or light. Understanding this type of upbringing is essential in understanding the man. He was extremely shy and often despondent. As a boy he developed an obsession to collect and catalog specimens from nature. This developed into a mania for gathering strange scientific observations as an adult. Fort was trying to make since of his world.

A few prominent authors were fans and friends of Fort's including Theodore Dreiser who was interested in Fort's idea of Monism or a universal oneness. Other authors, along with Dreiser, started the first Fortian Society which included; Ben Hecht, John Cowper Powys, Booth Tarkington, and Alexander Woollcott. H. L. Mencken and H. G. Wells were a few of the popular writers of the time that despised him.

This was a well researched and lovingly written book. The author obviously likes Fort and his unusual books. The volume is easy to read and very informative with many notes and quotations from Fort's personal letters and his unpublished autobiography. I have come away from this book liking Charles Fort and I look forward to reading his quirky books in the future. ( )
  craso | May 28, 2012 |
The influence of Charles Fort on popular culture isn’t that of some seeping, hidden stream percolating out of the depths of history to mysteriously water modern ideas. It’s more of a shaded river whose twisting path abuts a surprising number of cultural. The subtitle is a bit of marketing hyperbole. As Steinmeyer himself notes, Fort said the word “supernatural” had no place in his vocabulary, no meaning. But his peculiar works, four bizarre mixtures of satire and philosophy; compendiums of strange events and sometimes whimsical, sometimes sinister, sometimes absent explanations, known collectively as The Books of Charles Fort, are an important source stream for the torrents of writing on the paranormal the 20th century saw, Berlitz and von Daniken, ufology and raining frogs. His works are explicitly referenced in horror fiction as long ago as H. P. Lovecraft and as contemporaneously as Stephen King and Caitlin Kiernan. His ideas show up in the film Magnolia and an actual character in the recent movie The Whisperer in Darkness. He even gave us the word “teleportation”. And, of course, his name lives on in that indispensable journal of oddities, The Fortean Times.

This isn’t the first work from a major publisher on Fort. Damon Knight, the science fiction writer, did the worthy biography Charles Fort, Prophet of the Unexplained in 1970. But this has several advantages, besides availability, over Knight’s work. Not only does this work have photographs, but it also has numerous quotes from Fort’s earlier writings before 1920’s The Book of the Damned as well as the reactions, in private and in reviews, to those works. There are also selections from Fort’s unpublished autobiography Many Parts. This edition helpfully sets these quotes off in italics which further makes this a handsome production. After an unhappy childhood under a domineering and sometimes violent upper-middle class father, Fort left home at 17; worked as newspaper reporter for about three years; bummed about America, South Africa, Canada, and Britain for a couple of years; and returned home where he married, in 1896, Anna, a woman four years his senior. For the next 12 years, Fort and Anna lived poorly, supported by numerous stories, mostly of a realistic nature and noted for the verisimilitude of their dialogue and setting, that were published in several well-known magazines of the time. These brought him to the attention of Theodore Dreiser who was to become a lifelong friend. Dreiser used his growing reputation and fame to get Fort’s first novel published: The Outcast Manufacturers. Steinmeyer presents some interesting selections from this comic yet realistic novel of slum dwellers – usefully drawn from the Fort’s own impoverished circumstances.

From 1908 to 1918, Fort worked on two works that, to the despair of Fortean scholars and enthusiasts, are lost and known only through letters: “X” and “Y”. Steinmeyer tries to piece out their structure and underlying philosophies, and they seemed to have been closer to conventional fiction, perhaps in the style of The Outcast Manufacturers, than his later and more famous works. “X” seems to have been the story of the influence, exerted by mysterious rays, of a Martian civilization on human history. Fort even wrote a film treatment for it when Dreiser thought he was getting a job in the movies as a “scenario director”. “Y” was about a secret polar civilization and worked in the enigmatic Kaspar Hauser. While Dreiser was an enthusiastic cheerleader – he even used what he thought of as Fort’s serious philosophy in a play he wrote, publishers didn’t bite.

Then Fort came up with “Z”, what became The Book of the Damned, and Fort and his bizarre, staccato prose, his absolute skepticism in refusing to take any belief seriously, to note no categories, to mock astronomers and other scientists who “damned” inconvenient data, entered the world’s consciousness.

It’s for that earlier story of Fort’s life, and not the better known content of his four famous works, that is one of the book’s main values. The other is trying to discern any sort of true belief, any philosophical stance in Fort, to answer the question: crank or genius? He offers many contemporary insights from the famous to forgotten. H. L. Mencken thought Fort was pedaling nonsense. H. G. Wells scoffed at Fort, said that science was an exploration of the world, not the orthodoxy Fort claimed. While science writer and Fort correspondent Maynard Shipley agreed with Wells on Fort’s misunderstanding of the process of science and felt Fort was overpraised, he also acknowledged Fort’s writings left “a new and exhilarating emotion” in the reader that would color all his future readings of science. Fort interestingly admired Shipley’s review and said he saw himself pioneering a new literature that, in a world where movies would take over conventional drama, novels must have something besides humans for their character and that his damned data might be the substitute.

Fort’s predictions, of course, for the future of fiction did not prove true. Indeed, while Dreiser compared his singular literary genius to Poe, Fort had no stylistic imitators even among those dealing with similar subjects.

The last thing this biography brings to the table is a nice coda, a wrap up of Fort’s influence and what happened to those who were his ardent admirers like Ben Hecht and Tiffany Thayer and, of course, Dreiser. (It’s interesting to note that, rather like the circle of figures around H. P. Lovecraft, many of these names are probably remembered today only because of their association with Fort. Even Dreiser is becoming little known for anything besides providing the source novel for the film A Place in the Sun.) And Steinmeyer also corrects an old, unkind, and untrue notion that Anna Fort was a dullard little interested in her husband’s work. Indeed, she was his first reader, the one he tested all his fiction out on first as well as whatever those four books are.

In short, this book is required reading for anyone just developing their interest in the man behind “Fortean phenomena”. For those already familiar with Fort’s life and work, Steinmeyer presents enough new, primary source material to also make this book essential. ( )
  RandyStafford | May 28, 2012 |
Showing 5 of 5
no reviews | add a review
You must log in to edit Common Knowledge data.
For more help see the Common Knowledge help page.
Series (with order)
Canonical title
Original title
Alternative titles
Original publication date
Important places
Important events
Related movies
Awards and honors
Meek young men grow up libraries, believing it is their duty to accept the view which Cicero, which Locke, which Bacon, have given—forgetful that Cicero, Locke and Bacon were only young men in libraries when they wrote these books.
     —Ralph Waldo Emerson
Some circumstantial evidence is very strong, as when you find a trout in the milk.
     —Henry David Thoreau
You can oppose an absurdity only with some other absurdity.
For my brother and sister, Harry and Susan, from "the little kid"
First words
No one knew what to make of The Book of the Damned.
Last words
(Click to show. Warning: May contain spoilers.)
Disambiguation notice
Publisher's editors
Publisher series
Original language

References to this work on external resources.

Wikipedia in English (1)

Book description
Haiku summary

No descriptions found.

The seminal biography of the twentieth century's premier chronicler of the paranormal, Charles Fort--a man whose very name gave rise to an adjective, fortean, to describe the unexplained.

» see all 2 descriptions

Quick Links

Swap Ebooks Audio
14 wanted2 pay

Popular covers


Average: (3.88)
2 1
3 6
4 6
4.5 3
5 4

Is this you?

Become a LibraryThing Author.


About | Contact | Privacy/Terms | Help/FAQs | Blog | Store | APIs | TinyCat | Legacy Libraries | Early Reviewers | Common Knowledge | 119,588,999 books! | Top bar: Always visible