

|
Loading... Guy Mannering (1815)by Walter Scott
None. 883 Guy Mannering, by Sir Walter Scott (read 11 Dec 1966) Faster than Waverley, I believe I read it more avidly . Full of plot, rather predictable, yet it catches one up. As one reflects, it seems silly--but during the telling this is not true. Gypsies, smugglers, lost heir, curses, etc., are the ingredients for an interest-filled tale: "The grey old towers of the ruin, partly entire, partly broken, here bearing the rusty weather-stains of ages, and there partially mantled with ivy, stretched along the verges of the dark rock which rose on Mannering's right hand. In his front was the quiet bay, whose little waves, crisping and sparkling to the moonbeams, rolled successively..."! The setting is the latter 18th century (post- '45). Mannering, an Oxford student, arrives in Scotland. He has been expertly tutored in astrology, a subject in which he only half believes. He is given hospitality at an old family seat, now in decline, and has the opportunity to predict events affecting the heir who is born on the day of his arrival. The book recounts those events. The story is very engaging and I was sorry to finish it. It is not as moving as Heart of Midlothian or as historically charged as most of Scott's Scottish novels, but it has some of Scott's best characters: Paulus Pleydell, an advocate who is introduced to us in a tavern engaged in a drinking game ('Such, O Themis, were anciently the sports of thy Scottish children!'); Dandie Dinmont; who breeds terriers, all of whom are named either Pepper or Mustard; Dominie Sampson, an eccentric tutor (the reunion with his charge is not to be missed); and my personal favourite, Sir Robert Hazlewood, a pompous landowner who speaks in heavy, legal redundancies. Scott's talent and resources as a writer are bottomless: that's the impression I took from this book. More to Scott than Waverly no reviews | add a review
References to this work on external resources.
|
Google Books — Loading...
Popular coversRatingAverage: (4)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(I read this a few years ago, but forgot to catalogue it at the time) (