

|
Loading... Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close (original 2005; edition 2005)by Jonathan Safran Foer
Work detailsExtremely Loud and Incredibly Close by Jonathan Safran Foer (2005)
I have to say the number one complaint I have heard/read about the movie based on the book is that it is too soon to have stuff about the September 11th attacks. I don't know if these people actually read the book. The book is much more and September 11th plays a small role. Oskar's grandparents have already lived through tragedy during the bombings of Germany and losing loved ones. I did enjoy the book, but sometimes I got confused at who was narrating. The only part that was the most unbelievable was that the mother allowed her young boy to wonder the streets of NY alone. But now I want to know what was in the lock box!!!! This book is astounding. I will need to read it again because the first time was totally taken up with the story and the second time I will be able to concentrate on the language and the subtle or not so subtle nuances. Maybe even a third time so I can put it all together in my mind. I will be haunted for quite a while. I had to come back here and add the fifth star. More later, I hope. I loved this book for its comparison between the way that kids process grief and the way that adults do. While the book seems cryptic and almost gives the impression that Oskar has an emotional deficit, to me it seemed like a literary device to show a child’s limited understanding of a situation as grave as 9/11. Then, there is the mother’s apparent absence but this is, in my opinion, showing how adults deal with grief. I think this story also shows how life altering situations can make us change our view on humanity completely, as seen through the grandpa’s explanation of the death of the grandmother’s sister. This book also shows how missed connections can play a huge role in how someone’s life plays out.
The bigger problem is that Foer never lets his character wander off without an errand. In fact, there is hardly a line in this book that has not been written for the purpose of eliciting a particular emotion from the reader. The novel is a tearjerker. ...The skepticism and satire that marked the best parts of Everything Is Illuminated are nowhere in evidence here. The search for the lock that fits a mysterious key dovetails with related and parallel quests in this (literally) beautifully designed second novel from the gifted young author (Everything Is Illuminated, 2002). The searcher is nine-year-old Oskar Schell, an inventive prodigy who (albeit modeled on the protagonist of Grass's The Tin Drum) employs his considerable intellect with refreshing originality in the aftermath of his father Thomas's death following the bombing of the World Trade Center. That key, unidentified except for the word "black" on the envelope containing it, impels Oskar to seek out every New Yorker bearing the surname Black, involving him with a reclusive centenarian former war correspondent, and eventually the nameless elderly recluse who rents a room in his paternal grandma's nearby apartment. Meanwhile, unmailed letters from a likewise unidentified "Thomas" reveal their author's loneliness and guilt, while stretching backward to wartime Germany and a horrific precursor of the 9/11 atrocity: the firebombing of Dresden. In a riveting narrative animated both by Oskar's ingenuous assumption of adult responsibility and understanding (interestingly, he's "playing Yorick" in a school production of Hamlet) and the letter-writer's meaningful silences, Foer sprinkles his tricky text with interpolated illustrations that render both the objects of Oskar's many interests and the memories of a survivor who has forsworn speech, determined to avoid the pain of loving too deeply. The story climaxes as Oskar discovers what the key fits, and also the meaning of his life (all our lives, actually), in a long-awaited letter from astrophysicist Stephen Hawking. Much more is revealed as this brilliant fiction works thrilling variations on, and consolations for, its plangent message: that "in the end, everyone loses everyone." Yes, but look what Foer has found. Film rights to Scott Rudin in conjunction with Warner Bros. and Paramount; author tour.
References to this work on external resources.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Book description |
|
| Haiku summary |
|
(retrieved from Amazon Thu, 14 Feb 2013 13:45:00 -0500)
Nine-year-old Oskar Schell is a precocious Francophile who idolizes Stephen Hawking and plays the tambourine extremely well. He's also a boy struggling to come to terms with his father's death in the World Trade Center attacks. As he searches New York City for the lock that fits a mysterious key he left behind, Oskar discovers much more than he could have imagined.… (more)
Quick Links |
Google Books — Loading...| Swap | Ebooks | Audio |
| 26 avail. 1421 wanted |
(4.13)| 0.5 | |
| 1 | |
| 1.5 | |
| 2 | |
| 2.5 | |
| 3 | |
| 3.5 | |
| 4 | |
| 4.5 | |
| 5 |

Three editions of this book were published by Audible.com.
Penguin AustraliaAn edition of this book was published by Penguin Australia.
Become a LibraryThing Author.
Jonathan Safran Foer (born 1977) is an American writer best known for his 2002 novel Everything Is Illuminated. He lives in Brooklyn, New York, with his wife, the novelist Nicole Krauss, and their son, Sasha.
The synopsis
Nine-year-old Oskar Schell is an inventor, amateur entomologist, Francophile, letter writer, pacifist, natural historian, percussionist, romantic, Great Explorer, jeweller, detective, vegan, and collector of butterflies. When his father is killed in the September 11th attacks on the World Trade Centre, Oskar sets out to solve the mystery of a key he discovers in his father's closet. It is a search which leads him into the lives of strangers, through the five boroughs of New York, into history, to the bombings of Dresden and Hiroshima, and on an inward journey which brings him ever closer to some kind of peace
The review
I am sure I read this book a few years ago. Though I could not really recall what it was about exactly I remember I had a problem reading it. There was something about it that made me wonder if it would be a good idea to pick this up again but as I could not remember what it was exactly I felt obliged to at least find that out. After the first 5 pages I remembered. I had a hard time reading this book cause the story was weird and going everywhere. I did not understand the whole idea behind the book the last time I read it. So I decided to continue, finish the book and see if I would get it better this time.
That worked. I did get the story better this time but still am not very enthusiastic about the book. There seem to be two or maybe even three layers in this book discussing a lot of things. Example, I still do not have any idea if Oskar was behaving like he is before his loss or if it is the psychological reaction to the event. There are signs he was behaving like it before, but he also says at one point he will behave normal again once this is over. Actually the whole Oskar story already gives you a lot of feelings. He annoyed me a lot but still I felt sympathetic too and sometimes I just wanted to hit him right in the face.
Next you got the grandpa and grandma story, which is a sad story on its own but is woven with Oskar's too. Both traumatized and having to deal with great loss, trying to survive together or not so together. I also had some trouble recognizing the woman in grandfathers story as Oskar's grandmother.
What did become clear in this story is how important it is to actually say things out loud. Grandpa is writing things to his son which would have made his life easier if he told his wife. But the other way around too, grandma had feelings and ideas about it that had she told grandpa it would have been easier to get over things. Oskar and his mother have the same problem. Oskar does not feel like his mother understands him even though she might be on to him more than he knows.
Despite all the negative feelings this book leaves me with I cannot say it is a bad book. It did make me feel things and challenged me to find the meaning of things, but I know now for sure I will not ever read it again. (