

|
Loading... Kraken: An Anatomy (2010)by China Miéville (Author)
Ambitious and hugely smart. Nothing sits still very long here. As usual for Mieville at his best, for all his verbal gyrations, the power of his writing is in the visual images conjured for the reader. A lot of this one is very funny. I suspect people would enjoy this a lot more if they were not reading it as fantasy or science fiction - that is with certain expectations and built in assumptions and tropes. Read as something entirely new and enjoy. Not sure about this one. Not the instant delight and drawing in of his others - lots of bits and pieces going on but no overall coherence, too much wierd stuff dropped in just because China thinks it's cool. Needs a re-read. When I read this at Long Nook Beach in Truro I got myself a little freaked out about giant squids in the water, even though the book's not particularly horrifying. Mostly I loved KRAKEN because of Mieville's reliably surprising ideas, especially the city-magic he calls "knackery." The plot was gripping but fairly inconsequential feeling (threat of apocalypse = yawn, knowing metafiction about threat of apocalypse = also yawn). My favorite parts included the knackers mythology and the characters and plots, like the various cults, the United Magicians Assistants and Wati (the most magical organizer ever), which reminded me of the substantial pleasures of Mieville's IRON COUNCIL. What I didn't love as much was the flatness and predictability of the nerd-boy protagonist. Hey China: write some more girl heroes, eh? I was not, for the entirety of my reading experience, sure what to make of Kraken. Blurbs promised funny -- well, it didn't make me laugh, though there was a wry smile or two. And there was the feeling I always get with Miéville's work, a sort of, "Mm, okay, but give me something to get hold of." His work is frenetic, absolutely full of clever things, full of references to this and that, a nod here and a nod there. I've learnt to just sit back and wait for the end, for things to detangle themselves: I'm not up to it. But with this one, I wasn't sure if it was worth it -- and unfortunately, I remained unsure at the end. There's a lot in it: Goss and Subby, Tattoo, villains worth reading for. Dane, martyr-hero. But I was ambivalent about most of the rest. A brilliant world, a brilliant concept, and China Miéville can certainly write. But it didn't do it for me, somehow, anyway.
Kraken utilises Miéville’s common setting of London, albeit a strange London. This otherness beside the familiar is a strand in his work evident from King Rat and Un Lun Dun through to THE CITY AND YTIC EHT. This one started out as if it may have been written with a film or TV adaptation in mind - one with a potentially light-hearted take - but soon veers off down strange Miévillean byways which may be unfilmable. For these are the end times and cultists worshipping all manner of weird gods abound. It begins with a kind of locked room mystery as a giant squid, Architeuthis, has been stolen - formalin, tank and all - from its stance in the Darwin Centre, a natural history museum where Billy Harrow is a curator. He helped to prepare the squid for show and is thought to hold the knowledge that might allow all those interested in its recovery to find it. The police fundamentalist and cult squad, the FSRC, is called in to help investigate the disappearance which becomes more involved when Billy discovers a body pickled (in too small a jar) in the museum’s basement. And these are merely the first strangenesses to be encountered in this book. We also have the consciousness of a man embedded within a tattoo, a tattoo which moves and speaks. Then there is the double act of Goss and Subby - two shapeshifting baddies from out of time (they shift other people’s shapes) - and weird sects, cults and mancers of all sorts. Never short of incident and brimming with plot the novel is probably a bit too convoluted, with too many characters for its own good, and its one-damn-strange-thing-after-another-ness can verge on overkill. But this is an unashamed fantasy, a form to which I am antipathetic when it is taken to extremes; and Miéville is not one for restraint. While Kraken sometimes skirts along the edge of comedy it never fully embraces it. There are too many killings and acts of violence for comedy to sit comfortably. I might have liked the novel better if it had. Its main fault is that it never manages to settle on which sort of book it is meant to be, straddling various narrative stools such as police procedural, one man against the odds, woman in search of the truth about her vanished lover, etc. Miéville has done what all great science-fiction has done—and great so-called literary fiction, when it gets around to it—provide a nuanced, highly imagined critique of the zeitgeist, dressed up in a crackerjack story. ""... "Kraken" is, no mistake, a literary work. The hint is in the subtitle, "An Anatomy," because Miéville is exploring the gap between the prosaic squid and the mythic Kraken, between the mundane ground of everyday life and the sacred. What precisely turns a fish into a god? What is the anatomy of a legend? And how do gods manifest themselves in our world? ...Miéville's best work since "Perdido Street Station."
No descriptions found. Being chased by cults, a maniac, and the sorcerers of the Fundamentalist and Sect-Related Crime Unit, cephalopod specialist Billy Harrow inadvertently learns that he holds the key to finding a missing squid--a squid that just happens to be an embryonic god whose powers, properly harnessed, can destroy all that is, was, and ever shall be.… (more) |
Google Books — Loading...
Popular coversRatingAverage: (3.67)
Is this you?Become a LibraryThing Author. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I'm not sure what I was expecting when I started reading the book, but now that I'm finished I feel like I should have been expecting exactly this, because everything layered into it in perfectly unexpected ways and all of the little things that I love about his books were all there, in the end. I think it fell short of a five—which for my tastes he is certainly capable of—because I think I liked the pieces more than I liked the story. But still, a great book.