|
Loading...
LibraryThing recommendationsMember recommendations
Loading...
won't like
will probably not like
will probably like
will like
will love Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book. Great writing. Confusing to keep characters and families straight in the beginning. The story of a murder told from three different points of view. Great history of the Everglades. Also the stories of the main characters are well told. ( )Mathiessen's historicized fictional Edgar Watson is a fascinating character. His story is interwoven with that of the state of Florida and a history of racism at the turn of the last century. The first section of the book is told from revolving viewpoints of people and relatives who knew Edgar Watson. The second segment is told by his son Lucius, a historian. The third is told by Edgar himself. Few writers could handle these acrobatics of Point of View, yet Matthiessen manages it skillfully, turning the tapestry of the tales into one story, though it’s always shifting. It’s fascinating, compelling stuff. It won the National Book Award last year. And yet. This would not be a book I would press on a stranger, or even someone I didn’t know very well. It’s clearly a life’s work for Matthiessen. While rewarding, it’s definitely not a book for general audiences. But if you’re interested in U.S. and Florida history, like thick books that you can sink into for weeks or months at a time, or love historical novels with complex characters, then this is certainly worth checking out. Just give yourself plenty of time to devote to it. I'm a huge fan of historical fiction so when this book came out I was sure I'd like it. However, it had a lot going against it. First of all, its' daunting length-just short of 900 pages of dense writing. Then the absolutely incredible number of characters-impossible to keep straight and the lengthy list in the front of the book doesn't even scratch the surface. On page 715 I was still back pedalling, trying to refresh my memory about recurring characters. Then there was the southern dialect that I thought would make for difficult reading. With all that going against it, why did I absolutely LOVE this book? It was the writing! Matthiessen really can write. All the quotes on the first couple of pages, "epic," "masterpiece," "magnum opus," "touchstone of modern American literature" that usually seem like platitudes turned out to be dead on. There's no way to summarize the book- as I said, too many characters. The novel is divided into three books and at the beginning of the first book, in the prologue, we learn about the killing of Mr. Watson, which the rest of the book explores from different viewpoints. Book One is divided into sections told by different characters-his neighbors, those people on the shore where he died and sections of his daughter Carrie's diary. Book Two is the story of Watson's son Lucius and his research into those responsible for his father's death. Along the way, he has to accept that the father he loved and adored was more and less than what he seemed. In Book Three, EJ Watson tells the story of his life and adventures, including all that led up to his death. Set in southwestern Florida for the most part, with forays into northern Florida, South Carolina and the Oklahoma Indian Territory, in the years following the Civil War into the 1920's, Mattiessen tells a tale about the settling of and taming of the Florida Everglades and, in the telling, you learn about the frontier spirit that founded our great country. With a smattering of famous figures including Thomas Edison and Mark Twain, Matthiessen's themes include the unrelenting racism displayed in this part of the country during that time, nature's power, poverty, class struggle, man vs. nature, man vs. man and man vs. himself. In the end EJ Watson, who should be a hated figure, gives us much to think about. He will certainly go down as one of the most fascinating and riveting characters ever developed. Highly recommended. Repetitious and way too long. Retelling of the events from several viewpoints was tedious and sometimes downright difficult to get through. Several times I asked myself why I continued to listen. I was always hoping the book would redeem itself in the end. I give it two stars only for the description of the time and place. I'd give the reader, Anthony Heald, five stars for making it as interesting as possible. Ah..two weeks of my life I could have been reading something else. March 2009 Selection- The group found this book too wordy and hard to believe on several points. The main character was unlikable, but not enough to cause dislike for the book. The events seemed too many, too outlandish and too unlikely to be believed. Also detracting was that the story was essentially retold in each of the three books that make up this story, which many found tedious. Strong anti-war and anti-racist themes can be found throughout all the books. The author obviously cares deeply about this subject, but that may not be enough to make this a great book. Pros: Attention to detail regarding historic events and vivid depiction of the Everglades Cons: repetition due to construction of book, literally unbelievable, characters speaking in a distracting dialect as well as use of letters and diaries took readers out of the book
To sum it up in a few words is impossible since its interest lies in the ambition of storytelling and inevitability of story.
References to this work on external resources.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Book description |
|
(retrieved from Amazon Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:57:55 -0400)
The first test round has been closed. Visit the Open Shelves Classification group for details.
Quick Links |