HomeGroupsTalkZeitgeist
Hide this

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

Cosmic trigger : final secret of the…
Loading...

Cosmic trigger : final secret of the illuminati (1977)

by Robert Anton Wilson

Other authors: See the other authors section.

Series: Cosmic Trigger (1)

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingMentions
898119,830 (4.06)4
Recently added bynexist, Manas1000, private library, AVW, RobVel, baculus
Legacy LibrariesTerence Kemp McKenna
  1. 00
    Ancient Future by Wayne B. Chandler (quicksiva)
  2. 00
    (An Open Entrance To The Shut Palace Of) Wrong Numbers by Franklin Rosemont (paradoxosalpha)
    paradoxosalpha: Freewheeling counter-cultural autobiography with occult flavoring, construed as non-sequential episodes.
None
Loading...

Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.

No current Talk conversations about this book.

» See also 4 mentions

English (10)  Spanish (1)  All (11)
Showing 1-5 of 10 (next | show all)
One of my all-time favorite books...reading it is like being on psychedelics. Try it and let me know. ( )
  burningdervish | Nov 29, 2016 |
My reactions to reading this book in 2004.

"Foreword", Timothy Leary, Ph.D -- Basically an account of the syncretic blend of weirdness the reader can expect from Wilson, who seems to be Leary's friend.

Cosmic Trigger: The Final Secret of the Illuminati, Robert Anton Wilson -- This book provided some interesting autobiographical material on Wilson. I note confirmation of my theory that engineers seemed to be attracted to outre ideas by the fact that Wilson started out training to be an electrical engineer before switching to mathematics (which may explain why he has such a good grasp of quantum physics). He admits to being of an analytical mind and fascinated by puzzles. I would say, in his case, the analytical mind likes to create puzzles where none exist as well as solve them. In his mind, pattern seeking behavior is in overdrive, and that accounts for the sometimes delightful and interesting connections he makes between the occult and/or (a favorite conjunction of Wilson who eschews binary logic) science and/or conspiracy theories as well as his seeming encyclopedia knowledge of the occult and conspiracy theories. I came away with more and less respect for Wilson.

Wilson, at least the Wilson writing in the years after this book came out, struck me as something of a radical skeptic -- willing to entertain most notions, unwilling to firmly believe or disbelieve any. He lives in the perennial world of maybe. To be sure, there is some of that here. Wilson, like many occultists and pseudoscientists, carefully notes he doesn't fall for just any idea, that self-delusion and hoaxing exist, but he doesn't note that too often or often enough. I found it interesting that he claims that Aleister Crowley tried to bring a scientific method to his occult studies -- to believe nothing except by proof and to keep careful notes.

However, the Crowley Wilson describes seems to have neglected the importance of controlled experiments, alternate explanations, and replicability. Science is more than just hypothesizing and keeping records. Wilson too easily falls into the common pseudoscientist's habit of citing one alleged paranormal event as proof of another. For instance, he uncritically accepts the validity of Kirlian photography (as evidence of auras around humans -- this book came out at the height of the Kirlian photography craze) and cattle mutilations. He also too easily dismisses skeptics by implying that they unreasonably imply UFO contactees and other experiencers of the paranormal are lying. The more frequent explanations that skeptics give is sincere misperception and later embroidering and conflating of accounts and events. On the other hand, Wilson does point out the common themes of several occult principles and experiences. Even if you explain these as hallucinations and perceiving bogus patterns in reality there is a mystery worth investigating here. Why do the same archetypes and themes show up again and again? What is it in the human brain that makes these themes common and appealing?

Of course, scientists are operating using the same brain as mystics so it's not surprising that people like Timothy Leary and the quantum mystics-physicists cited here should try, like Fludd and other medieval occultists, to unify everything into systems, systems of spirit and science, occult and reason. The material on Leary and his work was interesting (Wilson was a friend of Leary's and wrote several books with him). Leary comes across initially as a serious scientist who got sidetracked into the systematizing obsession noted above (but, then, scientists are supposed to systematize). Wilson describes his charm and likeability. (Even G. Gordon Liddy, one time prosecutor of Leary and then lecture buddy, noted that Leary was a charming, likeable, nice guy but that he wouldn't take any food or drink offered by him. The latter is unfair if Wilson is correct in stating that Leary was strictly against giving drugs to people unaware.) The problem was Leary, like psychologists in the era before magnetic resonance imaging and the other biopsychiatric tools of the last fifteen years, was grappling with a difficult subject without adequate tools. He fell back to the predictable position psychologists usually do in that position: trying to explain the brain and consciousness using contemporary technology, here computers and computer programming and logic circuits (there is also traces of the notion of RNA memory).

Putting aside the notion of terrestrial life being seeded by alien intelligences, Leary's notion of human evolution has a couple of problems. First and foremost, it assumes that there is a purpose to human evolution instead of all evolution, including human, simply being the selection of a species members to survive best in the environment the species currently finds itself in. Second, there seems to be a Lamarckian feel to it with, if I understood Leary correctly, DNA being rewritten via experiences. To be fair to Leary, his ideas have a kernel of truth in them. The human brain is altered by experiences of all kind, drugs, including neurotransmitters, do affect the quality of consciousness, environment does influence the expression of genes even if it doesn't delete or add genes. I read with interest the success of Leary using LSD and other psychedelic drugs in a controlled program of psychotherapy. I think that research should have continued (providing there was ethical guidance for playing around with the brain chemistry of experimental subjects) in this field and that psychedelic drugs shouldn't have become taboo in any circumstance. I believe I've recently read of modern research confirming that LSD did have some therapeutic value. I also find Leary's claim that LSD could be used if the context, setting, and consent of the patient were controlled. I suspect that most horrible experiences of people on acid were the result of those not being controlled. (I was reminded of Philip K. Dick's claim that he would give people contemplating taking LSD a Rorschach test first to see if they would have a bad trip. I was also reminded of the lethal effects on the unwitting CIA employee who was given LSD.) Certainly, I have personally known people who have taken LSD and had good, harmless experiences, and I have no reason to disbelieve them. I did find Wilson's account of the brutal death of his daughter and confirmation of the rumor that he had her cyronically suspended interesting. (May 16, 2004)

"Afterword", Saul-Paul Sirag -- Physicist Sirag uncritically accepts the powers of Uri Geller and then goes off onto some incomprehensible numerological manipulations of physical values in an attempt to reconcile Special Relativity and quantum physics. ( )
  RandyStafford | Mar 13, 2014 |
Difficult to give this one a rating. It is a wonderful historical piece and gives an interesting view of what life in the Berkeley was like for some folks. Also obviously influential on later fringe culture. (I'd be willing to wager that this along w/ Illuminatus had at least some impact on The Invisibles.

However, the writing does fail into the trap where Wilson seems to take a lot of his source material at face value, or attempts to convince the reader it's unlikely to be a hoax or that mundane explanations are less likely than radical ones.

There is interesting conflict internally as Wilson's "Skeptic" thoughts seem to be lurking in the unconscious even during some of the more outrageous claims.

If you have any interest in Berkeley in the 60s/70s, Leary or like Philip K. Dick's trippier writing like VALIS, this is worth a read.
  JonathanGorman | Feb 19, 2012 |
I try to open my mind up as much as possible when reading R.A.W.'s books, because it is more fun that way. Skipping the self-medication and sex magick bit, the basic thesis I think anyone can draw from this is that it is good to keep an open mind and believe "six impossible things before breakfast," as long as no one else is getting hurt by it. This book suffers a little looking back, because many of the predictions regarding scientific cures for aging and death, or the state of manned space travel, are sadly not in evidence in today's world (or at least they have not been shared with us). Wilson's optimism and enthusiasm for ideas of progress that guaranteed the singularity occurring by 2012 seem naive at this point, but I am sure Wilson would remain optimistic were he with us today, and just push the dates back further. ( )
2 vote lithicbee | May 30, 2011 |
R. A. Wilsons books are not the occult themed mystery stories they appear to be. They are in fact attempts at ontological subversion, by trying to create states of cognitive dissonance in the reader thereby freeing the reader from preconcieved ideas and assumptions that can distort and color the perception of reality. Many years after reading this and other R.A.W. books I discoverd the academic discipline of General Semantics founded by Alfred Korzbyski that says all human experience is in fact an abstraction that is mediated by culture, language and the nervous system itself. Only by maintaining a constant awareness of this fact can we free ourselves from its limiting confines. This is the essential lesson of Zen Buddhism and is the secret of the true practitioner of the mystical arts. ( )
1 vote latefordinner | Feb 15, 2011 |
Showing 1-5 of 10 (next | show all)
no reviews | add a review

» Add other authors (3 possible)

Author nameRoleType of authorWork?Status
Robert Anton Wilsonprimary authorall editionscalculated
Leary, TimothyForewordsecondary authorsome editionsconfirmed
Sirag, Saul-Paulsecondary authorsome editionsconfirmed
Thompson, JohnIllustratorsecondary authorsome editionsconfirmed
You must log in to edit Common Knowledge data.
For more help see the Common Knowledge help page.
Series (with order)
Canonical title
Original title
Alternative titles
Original publication date
People/Characters
Important places
Important events
Related movies
Awards and honors
Epigraph
Dedication
First words
Quotations
Last words
Disambiguation notice
Publisher's editors
Blurbers
Publisher series
Original language
Book description
Haiku summary

No descriptions found.

No library descriptions found.

Quick Links

Swap Ebooks Audio
109 wanted2 pay

Popular covers

Rating

Average: (4.06)
0.5 1
1 2
1.5
2 7
2.5 1
3 34
3.5 2
4 51
4.5 10
5 66

Is this you?

Become a LibraryThing Author.

 

You are using the new servers! | About | Privacy/Terms | Help/FAQs | Blog | Store | APIs | TinyCat | Legacy Libraries | Early Reviewers | Common Knowledge | 113,320,043 books! | Top bar: Always visible