|
Loading... A History of Political Trials: From Charles I to Saddam Hussein (The Past…by John Laughland
None. LibraryThing recommendationsNone. Member recommendationsLoading...
won't like
will probably not like
will probably like
will like
will love Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book. no reviews | add a review
References to this work on external resources.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Book description |
|
“This is a formidable and well-documented counterblast to a developing modern orthodoxy, expressing a point of view that many readers will not even have suspected existed, let alone read.”—Anthony Daniels, Spectator
“A useful and controversial contribution to the debate about victor's justice, and a valuable warning that international war crimes tribunals need to operate with precision and care.” —Jonathan Steele, Guardian
The rapid development of the use of international courts and tribunals to try heads of state for genocide and other crimes against humanity has been welcomed by most people, because they think that the establishment of international tribunals and courts to try notorious dictators represents a triumph of law over impunity. In A History of Political Trials, John Laughland takes a very different and controversial view, namely that political trials are inherently against the rule of law and almost always involve the abuse of process, as well as being seriously hypocritical.
By means of detailed consideration of the trials of figures as disparate as Charles I, Louis XVI, Erich Honecker and Saddam Hussein, Laughland shows that the guilt of the accused has always been assumed in advance, that the judges are never impartial, that the process is always unfair and biased in favor of the prosecution, that the defense is not permitted to use all the arguments at its disposal, and that often the accusers have done exactly what they accuse the defence of having done. All the trials he recounts were marked by arbitrariness and injustice, often gross injustice. Although the chapters are short and easy to read, they are the fruit of formidable erudition and wide reading. The general reader will be forced by this book to re-examine the ideas on this subject, and will be much less sanguine about the possibility of bringing dictators and other leaders to genuine justice.
John Laughland lives in Bath and is an author, journalist, and has been a university lecturer in France. He has published The Tainted Source: The Undemocratic Origins of the European Idea (Time Warner Paperbacks) and has written for the Spectator, The Economist, and The New York Times.
Table of Contents
Introduction
The Trial of Charles I and the Last Judgement
The Trial of Louis XVI and the Terror
War Guilt after World War I
Defeat in the Dock: the Riom Trial
Justice as Purge: Marshal Pétain faces his Accusers
Treachery on Trial: the Case of Vidkun Quisling
Nuremberg: Making War Illegal
Creating Legitimacy: the Trial of Marshal Antonescu
Ethnic Cleansing and National Cleansing in Czechoslovakia, 1945–1947
People’s Justice in Liberated Hungary
From Mass Execution to Amnesty and Pardon: Postwar Trials in Bulgaria, Finland, and Greece
Politics as Conspiracy: the Tokyo Trials
The Greek Colonels, the Emperor Bokassa, and the Argentine Generals: Transitional Justice, 1975–2007
Revolution Returns: the Trial of Nicolae Ceausescu
A State on Trial: Erich Honecker in Moabit
Jean Kambanda, Convicted without Trial
Kosovo and the New World Order: the Trial of Slobodan Miloševic
Regime Change and the Trial of Saddam Hussein
Conclusion
Notes
Bibliography and Further Reading
Index
(retrieved from Amazon Fri, 08 Jan 2010 12:44:06 -0500)
The first test round has been closed. Visit the Open Shelves Classification group for details.
Quick Links |
| Ebooks | Audio | Swap |
| — | — |
Monien mielestä nykyisin yleistyneet oikeudenkäynnit valtiojohtajia kohtaan kansanmurhista tai rikoksista ihmisyyttä vastaan ovat positiivista oikeudellista kehitystä. Kirjoittajan mielestä asia ei välttämättä ole näin. Hän käy yksityiskohtaisesti kirjassaan lävitse erilaisia poliittisia oikeudenkäyntejä Charles I tuomiosta lähtien aina tähän päivään asti.
Kirjan sanomana on se, että lähes aina näihin oikeudenkäynteihin on liittynyt poliittista tarkoituksenmukaisuutta. Oikeudelliset ihanteet eivät juuri koskaan toteudu poliittisissa oikeudenkäynneissä.