Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.
Loading... Sacred Narrative: Readings in the Theory of Myth (edition 1984)by Alan Dundes
Work InformationSacred Narrative: Readings in the Theory of Myth by Alan Dundes
None Loading...
Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book. No current Talk conversations about this book. no reviews | add a review
Alan Dundes defines myth as a sacred narrative that explains how the world and humanity came to be in their present form. This new volume brings together classics statements on the theory of myth by authors such as William Bascom, Jan de Vries, G. S. Kirk, James G. Frazer, Theodor H. Gaster, Mircea Eliade, Bronislaw Malinowski, C. G. Jung, and Claude Lévi-Strauss. Rather than limiting this collection to classical Roman and Greek mythology, Dundes gives the book a worldwide scope. The twenty-two essays by leading experts on myth represent comparative functionalist, myth-ritual, Jungian, Freudian, and structuralist approaches to studying the genre. No library descriptions found. |
Current DiscussionsNonePopular covers
Google Books — Loading... GenresMelvil Decimal System (DDC)291.13Religions Other Religions Comparative Religion; Mythology (No Longer Used) Mythologies Archetypal MythologyLC ClassificationRatingAverage:
Is this you?Become a LibraryThing Author. |
I enjoyed this, but it was darn hard to get through. It took me nearly a month to get through the entire thing (along with a few other books, admittedly) and almost nothing takes that long for me. Not what I'd recommend for light reading.
That said, it was incredibly interesting. The editor tried to bring together many different viewpoints, and seemed to succeed. Some parts were slightly repetitive, but this was due to the fact that he was trying to present a balanced picture. The most irritating thing about the book was that every author seemed to feel that their way was the only way to approach myth. Alan Dundes' own essay was a breath of fresh air, compared to that, as he seemed acutely aware that a single definition/method of analyzing myth would never suffice to totally explain their significance. Also, the last essay made me laugh out loud. The book was worth reading just to get to that. 9/10 ( )