|
Loading... Mutual Misunderstanding: Scepticism and the Theorizing of Language and Interpretation (Post-Contemporary Interventions) (original 1992; edition 1992)14 | None | 1,440,498 |
(4) | None | Do others understand what we say or write? Do we understand them? Theorists of language and interpretation claim to be more concerned with questions about "what" we understand and "how" we understand, rather than with the logically prior question "whether" we understand each other. An affirmative answer to the latter question is apparently taken for granted. However, in Mutual Misunderstanding, Talbot J. Taylor shows that the sceptical doubts about communicational understanding do in fact have a profoundly important, if as yet unacknowledged, function in the construction of theories of language and interpretation. Mutual Misundertanding thus presents a strikingly original analysis of the rhetorical patterns underlying Western linguistic thought, as exemplified in the works of John Locke, Jacques Derrida, Gottlob Frege, Jonathan Culler, Noam Chomsky, Ferdinand de Saussure, H. Paul Grice, Michael Dummet, Stanley Fish, Alfred Schutz, Barbara Herrnstein Smith, Harold Garfinkel, and others. This analysis reveals how, by the combined effect of appeals to "commonsense" and anxieties about implications of relativism, scepticism has a determining role in the discursive development of a number of the intellectual disciplines making up the "human sciences" today, including critical theory, literary hermeneutics, philosophy of language and logic, communication theory, discourse and conversation analysis, pragmatics, stylistics, and linguistics. Consequently, this provocative study will be of value to readers from a wide variety of disciplinary backgrounds.… (more) |
▾Will you like it?
Loading...
Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book. ▾Conversations (About links) No current Talk conversations about this book. ▾Series and work relationships Belongs to SeriesBelongs to Publisher Series
|
Canonical title |
|
Original title |
|
Alternative titles |
|
Original publication date |
|
People/Characters |
|
Important places |
|
Important events |
|
Related movies |
|
Epigraph |
Nicht ist so schwer,
als sich nicht betrügen.
(Wittgenstein) La gente sa quel che fa; spesso sa perché fa quel che fa; ma ciò che non sa, è cosa fa quel che essa fa (Foucault) È solo pensando persino più pazzamente dei filosofi che puoi risovere i loro problemi. | |
|
Dedication |
A Read e Roy, padre e maestro, nella cui conversazione immagino di essere | |
|
First words |
Questo libro tratta dei retaggi e della creatività nella teoria del linguaggio. Cerca di svelare in quali modi, nella teorizzazione sul linguaggio, ereditiamo particolari vincoli discorsivi, e suggerisce un possibile metodo con il quale possiamo liberarci di questi retaggi.
PREFAZIONE Gli altri capiscono ciò che diciamo o scriviamo? Noi capiamo gli altri? Sono domande che raramente ci si rivolge nella teoria del linguaggio. | |
|
Quotations |
|
Last words |
Indagare la relazione tra discorso e metadiscorso condurrebbe la teoria del linguaggio in giochi linguistici altrettanto frustranti e autoingannatori? Questo, come ho finito per imparare, è difficile a dirsi. (Click to show. Warning: May contain spoilers.) | |
|
Disambiguation notice |
|
Publisher's editors |
|
Blurbers |
|
Original language |
|
Canonical DDC/MDS |
|
Canonical LCC |
|
▾References References to this work on external resources. Wikipedia in EnglishNone ▾Book descriptions Do others understand what we say or write? Do we understand them? Theorists of language and interpretation claim to be more concerned with questions about "what" we understand and "how" we understand, rather than with the logically prior question "whether" we understand each other. An affirmative answer to the latter question is apparently taken for granted. However, in Mutual Misunderstanding, Talbot J. Taylor shows that the sceptical doubts about communicational understanding do in fact have a profoundly important, if as yet unacknowledged, function in the construction of theories of language and interpretation. Mutual Misundertanding thus presents a strikingly original analysis of the rhetorical patterns underlying Western linguistic thought, as exemplified in the works of John Locke, Jacques Derrida, Gottlob Frege, Jonathan Culler, Noam Chomsky, Ferdinand de Saussure, H. Paul Grice, Michael Dummet, Stanley Fish, Alfred Schutz, Barbara Herrnstein Smith, Harold Garfinkel, and others. This analysis reveals how, by the combined effect of appeals to "commonsense" and anxieties about implications of relativism, scepticism has a determining role in the discursive development of a number of the intellectual disciplines making up the "human sciences" today, including critical theory, literary hermeneutics, philosophy of language and logic, communication theory, discourse and conversation analysis, pragmatics, stylistics, and linguistics. Consequently, this provocative study will be of value to readers from a wide variety of disciplinary backgrounds. ▾Library descriptions No library descriptions found. ▾LibraryThing members' description
|
Current DiscussionsNoneGoogle Books — Loading...
RatingAverage: (4)0.5 | | 1 | | 1.5 | | 2 | | 2.5 | | 3 | | 3.5 | | 4 | 1 | 4.5 | | 5 | |
|