Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.
Loading... An Essay on the Modern Stateby Christopher W. Morris
None Loading...
Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book. No current Talk conversations about this book. no reviews | add a review
This important book is the first serious philosophical examination of the modern state. It inquires into the justification of this particular form of political society. It asks whether all states are 'nation-states', what are the alternative ways of organizing society, and which conditions make a state legitimate. The author concludes that, while states can be legitimate, they typically fail to have the powers (e.g sovereignty) that they claim. Many books analyze government and its functions but none focuses on the state as a distinctive form of political organization or examines critically the claims states make for themselves. In filling this lacuna Christopher Morris has written a book that will command the attention of political philosophers, political scientists, legal theorists, and specialists in international relations. No library descriptions found. |
Current DiscussionsNonePopular covers
Google Books — Loading... GenresMelvil Decimal System (DDC)320.1Social sciences Political Science Political Science The StateLC ClassificationRatingAverage:
Is this you?Become a LibraryThing Author. |
The book starts with a slightly superficial historical chapter where the author fast-forwards past various state-like political organizations known from European history. The author then discusses anarchy as a putative counterpoint to the state. In my opinion, he takes it too far when he discusses game theoretical models of anarchical society. Game theory does not deserve any place in a book about the state.
He fortunately makes up for the excessive theoretic gameplay in the chapters on legitimacy, sovereignty, and practical justification of states, all of which are much more informative. These discussions compare quite favorably to others that I’ve read on the same subjects. The author draws a lot of inspiration from Thomas Hobbes, but he does it in fluid style without getting stuck in interpretive details.
I wish the author had written a bit more about the functions and alternative institutions of government, but I understand that it goes beyond the scope of a philosophical work. All in all I would recommend this book to readers interested in classical and modern philosophy of the state, but not so much to readers looking for theoretical accounts of modern state institutions.