

|
Loading... The Copernican Revolution: Planetary Astronomy in the Development of… (1957)by Thomas S. Kuhn
None. Apart from the scientific import of the Copernican Revolution, Kuhn's book plays an illustrative role in the still needed polemic against Christian fundamentalism. It provides (at least hints at) parallels between the fundamentalist arguments against evolution (and other science influenced practices) and the old biblical arguments against Copernicus. ( )(posted on my blog: davenichols.net) Historian of science Thomas Kuhn served up this foundational and mathematical history of the Copernican Revolution, that amazing period of time which saw man's idea of a geocentric universe replaced with a more accurate heliocentric one. Copernicus himself delivered the foundational work, De revolutionibus orbium coelestium libri six ("Six Books on the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres"), which forever influenced the course of science's understanding of planetary motion. Kuhn's history covers the pre-Renaissance groundwork laid down from ancient times, especially in works by Aristole and Ptolemy, and moves the story through the problems associated with these accepted models. Copernicus himself is largely ignored until much later in the book as Kuhn makes sure the reader understands just why Copernicus felt the need to break from tradition and put forth an alternative model. Once De revolutionibus is published and spreads, Kuhn follows the story on through the later work of Brahe, Kepler, and Galileo, as well as explaining just why this Revolution was such a pronounced one in hindsight. Kuhn's writing is very exact, and he can be a bit meticulous with some of the geometry. I loved this, but I recognize that some popular history of science readers might find this a bit too technical. Anyway, Kuhn is an excellent historian and presents a well-written and concise account of one of the most important periods in the history of science. Four stars. “This book is the story of the Copernican Revolution in all three of these not quite separate meanings – astronomical, scientific, and philosophical.” “Initiated as a narrowly technical, highly mathematical revision of classical astronomy, the Copernican theory became one focus for the tremendous controversies in religion, in philosophy, and in social theory, which, during the two centuries following the discovery of America set the tenor of the modern mind.” A classic. I wrote something about this book over here: http://tinyurl.com/c3h36 no reviews | add a review Is a study of
References to this work on external resources.
|
Google Books — Loading...Popular coversRatingAverage: (4.23)
Is this you?Become a LibraryThing Author. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||