Hide this

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

A Death in Vienna: A Novel (Mortalis) by…

A Death in Vienna: A Novel (Mortalis) (original 2005; edition 2007)

by Frank Tallis

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingMentions
4692322,081 (3.47)22
Title:A Death in Vienna: A Novel (Mortalis)
Authors:Frank Tallis
Info:Random House Trade Paperbacks (2007), Paperback, 480 pages
Collections:Your library

Work details

A Death in Vienna: A Novel (Mortalis) by Frank Tallis (2005)


Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.

No current Talk conversations about this book.

» See also 22 mentions

English (17)  French (2)  German (1)  Danish (1)  Spanish (1)  Norwegian (1)  All (23)
Showing 1-5 of 17 (next | show all)
Just not interesting enough.
  dorie.craig | Jun 22, 2017 |
Vienna, 1902, the center of music, literature and the new science of the human mind.

A brutal murder of a medium rocks the cultured world. Found dead in her home in a locked room, with a hold in her chest but no weapon or bullet found to determine what killed her. No fingerprints or clues are apparent either. Detective Oskar Rheinhardt is faces with solving an impossible case. With the assistance of his friend Dr. Max Liebermann,a follower of Sigmund Freud and Freud's new school of psychology, Rheinhardt and Liebermann to solve if it is human or supernatural force that caused the death.

It doesn't help that Rheinhardt's boss is under pressure from the Crown to quickly arrest the murderer. It doesn't help that some notable citizens were clients of the medium and don't want to be attached to any scandal.

I took my time reading to enjoy the atmosphere of the book and see if I could pick up on the clues. They are not blatant, but they are there. ( )
  ChazziFrazz | Jun 23, 2016 |
Mortal Mischief, by Frank Tallis, is the first in a series known as the Liebermann Papers; in it, we are introduced to Max Liebermann, a young psychiatrist living in Vienna in 1902, and his friend, Inspector Oskar Rheinhardt with the Vienna police force. Max is friendly with Sigmund Freud, although he finds his constant dwelling on sexuality to be a bit over the top; still, some of Freud's ideas have merit in Max's view and he is happy to place those ideas at the service of Oskar when a puzzling, "locked room" type of murder takes place. It seems that a beautiful young medium, Fraulein Lowenstein, has been killed, but how the killer got out of the locked room in which her body was found and what weapon was used to kill her are complete mysteries. That is, until Oskar and Max begin to look into the past lives of the circle of devotees who had been planning to attend a seance on the night of the murder.... This is a series discovered by my husband, when he picked up a copy of the fourth novel in Victoria, B.C., and then realized he needed to go back to read the first three novels as well. I'm glad he did, because this is a very intriguing set of characters (I didn't even mention Max's fiancee Clara or his patient, the Englishwoman Amelia Lydgate, in the above synopsis), living in a very interesting place at a very interesting time. Tallis does a good job of setting the atmosphere of that world, including the nascent studies of electricity in health care, the theory of "hysterical neurosis," the rising anti-Semitism of the time, and the burgeoning field of female suffrage. As a series, this is off to an excellent start, and I'm looking forward to reading the next one. Recommended! ( )
  thefirstalicat | Sep 8, 2015 |
Quite a good read and a good thriller based in turn of the century Vienna.
I had no idea that the Prater wheel was up and running at this time, and I appreciated the characters' love of the yummy pastries and coffee that the cafes serve. Also very good on the anti Semitism which particularly plagues Austria, even to this day. ( )
  annbury | Feb 19, 2014 |
he murder mystery is not *that* interesting but the setting is wonderful. Really. It has some of my favourite things mixed in an historical murder mystery. So it has birth of psychoanalysis lit (Freud, Vienna 1902), the hero is a young Jewish Doctor, a fan of Professor Freud. We have Vienna, 1902, music (Beethoven, Mahler, Strauss, Chopin) both our hero and his counter part in the police are music lovers. We have Vienna, 1902, and the 14th Secession exhibition, dedicated to Beethoven. Klimt, Klinger, the building. Tallis makes the period come alive. The antisemitism in the city, the clash of modern values and the rise of the Pan German regime.

I will read the second novel in the series. ( )
  writerlibrarian | Apr 7, 2013 |
Showing 1-5 of 17 (next | show all)
no reviews | add a review
You must log in to edit Common Knowledge data.
For more help see the Common Knowledge help page.
Series (with order)
Canonical title
Original title
Alternative titles
Original publication date
Important places
Important events
Related movies
Awards and honors
First words
It was the day of the great storm. I remember it well because my father--Mendel Liebermann--had suggested that we meet for coffee at The Imperial. I had a strong suspicion that something was on his mind...
Last words
(Click to show. Warning: May contain spoilers.)
Disambiguation notice
Published in the UK as "Mortal Mischief", but in the US as "A Death in Vienna"
Publisher's editors
Publisher series
Original language

References to this work on external resources.

Wikipedia in English


Book description
Haiku summary

Amazon.com Product Description (ISBN 0812977637, Paperback)

In 1902, elegant Vienna is the city of the new century, the center of discoveries in everything from the writing of music to the workings of the human mind. But now a brutal homicide has stunned its citizens and appears to have bridged the gap between science and the supernatural. Two very different sleuths from opposite ends of the spectrum will need to combine their talents to solve the boggling crime: Detective Oskar Rheinhardt, who is on the cutting edge of modern police work, and his friend Dr. Max Liebermann, a follower of Sigmund Freud and a pioneer on new frontiers of psychology. As a team they must use both hard evidence and intuitive analysis to solve a medium’s mysterious murder–one that couldn’t have been committed by anyone alive.



Summertime–the Austrian Alps: A middle-aged doctor, wishing
to forget medicine, turns off the beaten track and begins a strenuous
climb. When he reaches the summit, he sits and contemplates the distant
prospect. Suddenly he hears a voice.
“Are you a doctor?”
He is not alone. At first, he can’t believe that he’s being addressed.
He turns and sees a sulky-looking eighteen-year-old. He recognizes
her (she served him his meal the previous evening). “Yes,” he replies.
“I’m a doctor. How did you know that?”
She tells him that her nerves are bad, that she needs help.
S ometimes she feels like she can’t breathe, and there’s a hammering in
her head. And sometimes something very disturbing happens. She sees
things–including a face that fills her with horror. . . .
Well, do you want to know what happens next? I’d be surprised if
you didn’t.
We have here all the ingredients of an engaging thriller: an isolated
setting, a strange meeting, and a disconcerting confession.
So where does this particular opening scene come from? A littleknown
work by one of the queens of crime fiction? A lost reel of an
early Hitchcock film, perhaps? Neither. It is in fact a faithful summary
of the first few pages of Katharina by Sigmund Freud, also known as
case study number four in his Studies on Hysteria, co-authored with Josef
Breuer and published in 1895.
It is generally agreed that the detective thriller is a nineteenthcentury
invention, perfected by the holy trinity of Collins, Poe, and
(most importantly) Conan Doyle; however, the genre would have
been quite different had it not been for the oblique influence of psychoanalysis.
The psychological thriller often pays close attention to
personal history–childhood experiences, relationships, and significant
life events–in fact, the very same things that any self-respecting
therapist would want to know about. These days it’s almost impossible
to think of the term “thriller” without mentally inserting the prefix
So how did this happen? How did Freud’s work come to influence
the development of an entire literary genre? The answer is quite simple.
He had some help–and that help came from the American film
Now it has to be said that Freud didn’t like America. After visiting
America, he wrote: “I am very glad I am away from it, and even more
that I don’t have to live there.” He believed that American food had
given him a gastrointestinal illness, and that his short stay in America
had caused his handwriting to deteriorate. His anti-American sentiments
finally culminated with his famous remark that he considered
America to be “a gigantic mistake.”
Be that as it may, although Freud didn’t like America, America
liked Freud. In fact, America loved him. And nowhere in America was
Freud more loved than in Hollywood.
The special relationship between the film industry and psychoanalysis
began in the 1930s, when many émigré analysts–fleeing
from the Nazis–settled on the West Coast. Entering analysis became
very fashionable among the studio elite, and Hollywood soon
acquired the sobriquet “couch canyon.” Dr. Ralph Greenson, for
example–a well-known Hollywood analyst–had a patient list that
included the likes of Marilyn Monroe, Frank Sinatra, Tony Curtis,
and Vivien Leigh. And among the many Hollywood directors who
succumbed to Freud’s influence was Alfred Hitchcock, whose thrillers
were much more psychological than any that had been filmed before.
In one of his films Freud actually makes an appearance–well, more or
less. I am thinking here of Spellbound, released in 1945, and based on
Francis Beedings’s crime novel The House of Dr. Edwardes.
T he producer of Spellbound, David O. Selznick, was himself in
psychoanalysis–as were most of his family–and so enthusiastic was
he about Freud’s ideas that he recruited his own analyst to help him
vet the script. Hitchcock’s film has everything we expect from a psychological
thriller: a clinical setting, a murder, a man who has lost his
memory, a dream sequence, and a sinewy plot that twists and turns
toward a dramatic climax. That this film owes a large debt to psychoanalysis
is made absolutely clear when a character appears who is–in
all but name–Sigmund Freud: a wise old doctor with a beard, glasses,
and a fantastically hammy Viennese accent.
Since Hitchcock’s time, authors and screenwriters have had much
fun playing with the resonances that exist between psychoanalysis and
detection. This kind of writing reached its apotheosis in 1975 with the
publication of Nicholas Meyer’s The Seven-Per-Cent Solution, a novel in
which Freud and Sherlock Holmes are brought together to solve the
same case.
The relationship between psychoanalysis and detection was not
lost on Freud. In his Introductory Lectures, for example, there is a passage
in which he stresses how both the detective and the psychoanalyst depend
on accumulating piecemeal evidence that usually arrives in the
form of small and apparently inconsequential clues.

If you were a detective engaged in tracing a murder, would you expect to find that the murderer had left his photograph behind at the place of the crime, with his address attached? Or would you not necessarily have to be satisfied with comparatively slight and obscure traces of the person you were in search of? So do not let us underestimate small indications; by their help we may succeed in getting on the track of something

Later in the same series of lectures, Freud blurs the boundary between
psychoanalysis and detection even further. He goes beyond pointing
out that psychoanalysis and detection are similar enterprises and suggests
that psychoanalytic techniques might actually be used to aid detection.
Freud describes the case of a real murderer who acquired highly
dangerous pathogenic organisms from scientific institutes by pretending
to be a bacteriologist. The murderer then used these stolen cultures
to fatally infect his victims. On one occasion, he audaciously wrote a
letter to the director of one of these scientific institutes, complaining
that the cultures he had been given were ineffective. But the letter
contained a Freudian slip–an unconsciously performed blunder.
Instead of writing in my experiments on mice or guinea pigs,
the murderer
wrote in my experiments on men. Freud notes that the institute director–
not being conversant with psychoanalysis–was happy to overlook
such a telling error.
In a little-known paper called Psychoanalysis and the Ascertaining of
Truth in Courts of Law,
Freud is even more confident that psychoanalytic
techniques might be used in the service of detection. He writes:
In both [psychoanalysis and law] we are concerned with a
secret, with something hidden. . . . In the case of the criminal it
is a secret which he knows he hides from you, but in the case of
the hysteric it is a secret hidden from himself. . . . The task of
the therapeutist is, however, the same as the task of the judge;
he must discover the hidden psychic material. To do this we
have invented various methods of detection, some of which
lawyers are now going to imitate.
It is interesting that criminology and forensic science emerged at exactly
the same time as psychoanalysis. In 1893, Professor Hans Gross
(also Viennese) published the first handbook of criminal investigation,
a manual for detectives. It was the same year that Freud published
(with Josef Breuer) his first work on psychoanalysis: a “Preliminary
Communication,” On the Psychical Mechanism of Hysterical Phenomena.
Freud, largely via Hollywood, wielded an extraordinary influence
on detective fiction. But to what extent is the reverse true?
We know that Freud was very widely read–and that he had
and Vivien Leigh. And among the many Hollywood directors who
succumbed to Freud’s influence was Alfred Hitchcock, whose thrillers
were much more psychological than any that had been filmed before.
In one of his films Freud actually makes an appearance–well, more or
less. I am thinking here of Spellbound, released in 1945, and based on
Francis Beedings’s crime novel The House of Dr. Edwardes.
The producer of Spellbound, David O. Selznick, was himself in
psychoanalysis–as were most of his family–and so enthusiastic was
he about Freud’s ideas that he recruited his own analyst to help him
vet the script. Hitchcock’s film has everything we expect from a psychological
thriller: a clinical settin...

(retrieved from Amazon Thu, 12 Mar 2015 18:23:31 -0400)

(see all 2 descriptions)

Dr Max Liebermann is a young psychoanalyst and disciple of Freud. Liebermann's good friend Oskar Rheinhardt is a Detective Inspector - hard working but lacking Liebermann's insights and forensic eye. So Liebermann is called to help with the death of a young medium in what seems to be supernatural circumstances. Originally published: London: Century.… (more)

(summary from another edition)

» see all 3 descriptions

Quick Links

Swap Ebooks Audio
5 avail.
40 wanted
1 pay

Popular covers


Average: (3.47)
0.5 1
1 1
2 11
2.5 9
3 33
3.5 12
4 44
4.5 2
5 13

Is this you?

Become a LibraryThing Author.


You are using the new servers! | About | Privacy/Terms | Help/FAQs | Blog | Store | APIs | TinyCat | Legacy Libraries | Early Reviewers | Common Knowledge | 115,075,532 books! | Top bar: Always visible