Help/FAQs |
About |
Privacy/Terms |
Blog |
Contact |
LibraryThing.com |
APIs |
WikiThing |
Common Knowledge |
46,390,301 books!
Copyright LibraryThing and/or members of LibraryThing, authors, publishers, libraries, cover designers, Amazon, Bol, Bruna, etc.
| static: /
It is not great literature; but that's ok, because not all books need to be. It is not terribly complex or profound; but once again, I doubt that was ever the point. It's cute. Like saturday morning cartoons. Like a lazy kitten.
I also think that the criticisms of this book as "derivative" are unfair in many ways. The Lord of the Rings was GREAT fantasy. It completely blew the genre out of the water and has defined it, and will continue to define it for decades to come. Coming down hard on Eragon for having some things in common with Lord of the Rings but not being "as good" is like coming down hard on a highschool basketball player for having "some things in common" with Michael Jordan but not being as good. It's just not fair.
There is nothing wrong with re-using elements of another's world. All fiction does it. There is a lot of GOOD, entertaining fiction out there that is a pastiche of previously thought-up worlds. And it's still plenty good fun.
So take it for what it is. It's a romp. It's a frolick. It's almost a folk tale: it takes place in a world so familiar you feel comfortable with it, and you know the young hero will win in the end.
If that's the type of story you are looking for, you will be very happy with this book.