|
Loading... What the Dormouse Said: How the 60s Counterculture Shaped the Personal…by John Markoff
LibraryThing recommendationsMember recommendationsLoading...
won't like
will probably not like
will probably like
will like
will love Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book. I think Markoff is a fine journalist, but I've never really liked any of his books all that much. This is a fairly pedestrian history of early computing compared to classics like The Dream Machine or Where Wizards Stay Up Late. It does, however, rescue Fred Moore from undeserved obscurity. An interesting book, pointing out all the ways that the beginnings of the personal computer were touched by the 1960's psychedelic counter-culture. 0.032 seconds to build listing no reviews | add a review
Amazon.com Product Description (ISBN 0143036769, Paperback)Most histories of the personal computer industry focus on technology or business. John Markoff’s landmark book is about the culture and consciousness behind the first PCs—the culture being counter– and the consciousness expanded, sometimes chemically. It’s a brilliant evocation of Stanford, California, in the 1960s and ’70s, where a group of visionaries set out to turn computers into a means for freeing minds and information. In these pages one encounters Ken Kesey and the phone hacker Cap’n Crunch, est and LSD, The Whole Earth Catalog and the Homebrew Computer Lab. What the Dormouse Said is a poignant, funny, and inspiring book by one of the smartest technology writers around.“Wonderful . . . [It] makes a mind-blowing case that our current silicon marvels were inspired by the psychedelic-tinged, revolution-minded spirit of the sixties. It’s a total turn-on.” —Steven Levy, author of Hackers (retrieved from Amazon Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:58:24 -0400) The first test round has been closed. Visit the Open Shelves Classification group for details. |
Abebooks |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Markoff’s thesis, that the 1960s psychadelic subculture shaped the ideas that lead up to the first personal computers, is pretty reasonable. The parties and grassroot organizations of the day brought people together, and the dream of a “personal” computer was just another example of “power to the people”. He gives plenty of facts & tales to support this angle.
My biggest complaint is that the book lacks a cohesive narrative thread. I like how Fabio Rojas describes it in his review: “There are so many people that just appear and disappear that it’s hard to keep track of them.” Several times, I wished I had taken the time to draw a “family tree” of the subjects, so I had some idea who they were and how they tied into everything. (