|
Loading... The Chicago Manual of Style: The Essential Guide for Writers, Editors, and…
| |
| Topics | | messages | Last message | | | Le Salon Litteraire du Peuple pour le Peuple : Peter Weissman: Dec. '09s featured real-life underappreciated author | | 376 | copyedit52, Yesterday 11:51am |  |
| Pedants' corner : What is your pet peeve? | | 426 | dtw42, December 2009 | |
| Book talk : Hangman Puzzle XXVI | | 348 | AHS-Wolfy, September 2009 | |
| Book talk : Book gone missing... (Just ranting...) | | 33 | divinenanny, August 2009 | |
| Book talk : BOOK TALK Another Silly Game Part23 | | 371 | moibibliomaniac, July 2009 | |
| Language : Capitalization issue | | 4 | lilithcat, May 2009 | |
| Combiners! : Gospel, Divination and the direction of Combiners | | 182 | BarkingMatt, May 2009 | |
| Taggers! : Other people's weirdness | | 69 | 235711, April 2009 | |
| Writer-readers : Help ASAP!!!--question for publishing industry | | 17 | JNagarya, March 2009 | |
| Combiners! : Chicago Manual of Style | | 40 | BarkingMatt, February 2009 | |
| Science Fiction Fans : What Are You Reading - Q1 ( January - March 2009) | | 165 | iansales, February 2009 | |
| The Green Dragon : Grammer? | | 123 | maggie1944, February 2009 | |
| What Are You Reading Now? : What Books Came Into Your Home Today?--January 2009 | | 306 | richardderus, January 2009 | |
| Art is Life : The Books Around You | | 47 | hemlokgang, January 2009 | |
| Dormant: Off-topic : Person below me........(new new thread -- the old new one was too long) | | 441 | xorscape, October 2007 | |
| Dormant: Editors, Researchers, Whatever : UK style manuals? | | 9 | PossMan, July 2007 | |
| Dormant: Editors, Researchers, Whatever : Chicago manual of style | | 6 | amandaellis, April 2007 | |
| Dormant: Combiners! : Different editions | | 65 | reading_fox, January 2007 | |
| Dormant: Recommend Site Improvements : Message flagging update #2 | | 117 | kageeh, December 2006 | |
| Dormant: Bug Collectors : Capitalisation feature : stop it please | | 8 | timspalding, November 2006 | |
| Dormant: Combiners! : Different Editions of Chicago Manual of Style | | 10 | rebeccanyc, November 2006 | |
| Dormant: Recommend Site Improvements : Amazon's Citations | | 12 | conceptDawg, September 2006 | |
| Dormant: Editors, Researchers, Whatever : Author--date system | | 5 | amandaellis, August 2006 | |
| Dormant: Editors, Researchers, Whatever : Message Board | | 13 | Robertgreaves, August 2006 | |
... proofer. I had what's called a good eye, but had to bone up on the symbols and grammatical rules via Words Into Type and The Chicago Manual of Style. And when Dell cut back on proofreading, its freelancers learned copy editing, a more rigorous part of the book production process that also ... The Chicago Manual of Style So I know I bought it, and had it and now its disappeared. The Chicago Manual of Style which I now need for a project. Drat, blast, dang... want to kick something. I have been looking for it since I imported all my data into LT and just can't find it anywhere. >258 In a former life, I used The Chicago Manual of Style constantly. I seem to recall that it favored no apostrophe in decades and similar usages, calling the apostrophe in this context 'dated.'
I don't have a Manual to hand or I'd check out what they say now. The Chicago Manual of Style. ... capitals for emphasis, particularly on categories. I am anything but a proscriptivist, but I still wanted to look it up in Chicago Manual (ed. 14*). It has a couple of passages that bear on it:
6.62 Writers have probably always felt the need for devises to give special expression—empahsis, ... ... take a course about the publishing industry, do so. Learn grammar. Other languages may be helpful. Get yourself copies of The Chicago Manual of Style, Words into Type, The MLA Handbook, and Merriam Webster's Eleventh Collegiate Dictionary for reference. Learn the standard proofreading ... ... vs 13th ed.
Of course, this would just push the discussion to a different level. While the 13th and 14th editions of The Chicago Manual of Style are obviously (to me), combinable under the work, but should be separated because it makes the "reviews look weird," other people would disagree. The Chicago Manual of Style and the Joy of Cooking are the two best examples of why different editions are different books.
The 13th ed of the Chicago Manual includes an entire chapter on the typesetting process, including photographs of lead type and a "new" photolithography machine. This ... ... students meant I really had to learn it!; and doing freelance editorial work means I've spent a lot of time consulting the Chicago Manual of Style, Words into Type, the Gregg Reference Manual, the Dictionary of Modern American Usage, etc.) ... also have The Oxford Guide to Style which is mainly used for OUP and Oxford University which sort of fits between S&W and The Chicago Manual Of Style.
... in Narnia by Laura Miller, The Private Patient by P. D. James, Martin Chuzzlewit by Charles Dickens, and The Chicago Manual of Style. Phew!
The only one not on my list was The City of Dreaming Books, but it looked sooo good. ... (I hope a single person was responsible for all instances). Also so tagged are Bulfinch's Mythology and The Chicago Manual of Style.
Someone's tagged The Mayor of Casterbridge with "12th century"!
I'll keep looking. ... me. Poor siubhank :(
381 kathi - It never occurred to me to eat the tea tree oil!
The person below me owns a copy of The Chicago Manual of Style and knows how to use it! ... would all be unbearably curious. ;-) It is good.
In the cubbies built into my desk, I have Roget's Thesaurus, The Chicago Manual of Style, Fast Fiction: Creating Fiction in Five Minutes, an old American Heritage Dictionary, The New Cassell's German Dictionary, a pair of Hungar ... ...
I favor combining them, because I favor the "dinner party test." If someone were to say—presumably while drunk—"The Chicago Manual of Style is my favorite book!" that person wouldn't mention the edition, nor would the person who chimed in "Oh, me too, with Words into Type a close ... I brought this question up some time ago, as I have two editions of The Chicago Manual of Style -- the 13th and the 15th. I referred to information in the preface of the 15th edition:
"New sections have been added on preparing electronic publications . .. guidance on citing electronic works . ... ... works: it's useful from the 'community' perspective to find other people with an interest in the topic.
I own a Chicago Manual of Style, but it's the 13th edition from my college days. That's an interesting datum, whether or not it's important enough to me to stay up-to-date with ... A question of policy and then a question of practicalities.
First: I'd like to separate out the Chicago Manual of Style, 14th edition, from the Chicago Manual of Style, 15th edition. Do people agree with me on this?
Second: Right now these are a mess. There are two main clumps of ... It has to do more with field than geographical. Chicago manual of style is traditionally used in humanities at least history in both in Canada and the US.
... have to check the publication's style guidelines. Some, mostly technical like the American Chemical Society, use what The Chicago Manual of Style calls "British Style". Many say nothing, or just to follow the CMOS, which means its "American Style." I would not be surprised to learn that ... ... English-language library databases that LibraryThing uses, including, as you mention, the Library of Congress.
CMOS = The Chicago Manual of Style, just as you say.
Without in any way denying that the current system is unpredictable, and particularly inappropriate for non-English books ... ... always followed cap/lowercase, or headline style, as recommended by CMOS (again whatever that is), because that's what the Chicago Manual of Style advocates for US titles, and for foreign language titles I've used whatever is appropriate for that language.
Having said all that, it seems to ... I have two editions of the Chicago Manual of Style, and I'm wondering whether they're different enough for me to separate them. What do others here think? Has anyone tried out the new online version of the Chicago manual of style? The setup sucks! They have a new page for every numbered item. Given each page in the hard copy has about five or six numbered items, that's over 4000 individual pages on the site!
I expected it to be setup more like Wi ... ... ulate:
A Dictionary of Foreign Words and Phrases in Current English
Copy-editing: The Cambridge Handbook, 3rd edn
The Chicago Manual of Style, 15th edn
Fowler's Modern English Usage 3rd edn
MLA Style Manual and Guide to Scholarly Publishing, 2nd edn
New Hart's rules
New Oxf ... This is something we can do manually as thingamabrarians. A lot of key references I use such as the Chicago manual of style aren't part of the Amazon Search Inside! program.
Once this is up and running we could make it a source of referrals. But rather than do it as a list, make it a ... I don't think different editions of a work should be combined (e.g. the 4th and 15th edition of the Chicago manual of style). Which edition of a how-to-guide you're using is usually critical.
Different formats (hardback/paperback) or geographical editions (British/American) should definately ... fishpond.com.au at sells the Chicago manual of style for $105.68 including delivery. I'm going to buy it from boffinsbookshop.com.au in Perth for $101.95. Their delivery fee is $8.80. They also sell it with the CD for $175 or $60 just for the CD. Dymocks is more expensive (~$115 inc. postage) and ... amandaellis - I am another Aussie considering the Chicago manual of style. Firstly for the fact that so much work now is 'globalised' and secondly, you can never have too many reference books! Can you let me know where you are ordering yours from? (a comment to my profile or a message here is ... ... between the author--date system as it appears in the Australian Style manual for authors editors and printers and the Chicago manual of style?
I'm guessing the Chicago manual probably recommends Title Case for publication titles (the Australian manual recommends the laborious Sentence ... ... there are a lot of discipline-specific style guides/manuals. The ones that I've personally had to use most often were the Chicago Manual of Style, the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, the American Medical Association Manual of Style, and the Associated Press St ... ... you consider absolutely indispensable for copyediting or proofreading? I'm looking for the best (U.S.) style guides beyond The Chicago Manual of Style, Strunk & White, and the usual dictionaries. Is Words Into Type worth the investment? Thank you!
|
 Google Books — Loading...
|
