Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.
The Double Redaction of the Deuteronomistic History (JSOT supplement)
No current Talk conversations about this book.
References to this work on external resources.
Wikipedia in English
No descriptions found.
Martin Noth argued that in the books of Joshua-Kings could be seen the work of a single, purposeful author or historian-a hypothesis which, although close to becoming one of those rare 'assured results of critical scholarship', has recently encountered criticism. Nelson observes that Noth's historian has a 'disturbing tendency to fall apart in the hands of those who work with him'. In this comprehensive study of the question, he attempts to put on a solid critical foundation the increasingly popular theory that the Deutoronomistic History is a product of a two-stage literary process.
RatingAverage: No ratings.
Is this you?
Become a LibraryThing Author.