Hide this

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

The Murder of King Tut by James Patterson
Loading...

The Murder of King Tut (edition 2010)

by James Patterson, Martin Dugard

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingMentions
5393617,030 (3.06)30
Member:DevourerOfBooks
Title:The Murder of King Tut
Authors:James Patterson
Other authors:Martin Dugard
Info:Grand Central Publishing (2010), Edition: Reprint, Paperback, 384 pages
Collections:Your library
Rating:1/2
Tags:None

Work details

The Murder of King Tut by James Patterson

None.

Loading...

Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.

Showing 1-5 of 36 (next | show all)
The Murder of King Tut has chapters covering the lives of the mysterious boy-king and those around him, the life of Howard Carter, the archaeologist who discovered his body, and a couple of chapters on James Patterson's own writing of the book. It's simple writing, easy to read, and I finished the whole book in an hour. It's a little sensational, of course, and caters to the lowest common denominator -- I don't think Nefertiti would have called Tutankhamen 'Tut', somehow. There were inconsistencies with things I know from my childhood interest in Egyptology, and I found the whole style just far too flippant.

What's more, I already read this theory, back in 1999. Bob Brier's book, The Murder of Tutankhamen, is more professional and convincing, though I believe his theories were discredited by modern scans on the mummy of Tutankhamen. Still, though Patterson tries to have a more personal touch, depicting real love affairs between Nefertiti and Akhenaten, and between Tutankhamen and Ankhesenamen, I found it less interesting and less absorbing than Bob Brier's more historical, detailed account of Tutankhamen's life and death. ( )
  shanaqui | Apr 9, 2013 |
James Patterson is an arrogant prick and this book is terrible. Terrible, awful, horrible. ( )
  E.J | Apr 3, 2013 |
This was a very interesting book and it was a very good read. I liked all the details about Carter and his excavation work over the decades. Also, the intrigues at the Egyptian palaces was intriguing. The one thing that bothered me, and I've said this in other reviews, is the book jumped back and forth in time. I find that frustrating as it tends to pull me out of the story. ( )
  Irishcontessa | Mar 30, 2013 |
History of King Tutankhamen, boy king of Egypt in about 1324 and how Howard Carter found his tomb in the valley of the Kings under rubble and pyramid builder houses. King Tut was king only for a short time until he was murdered. I enjoyed the history did did not like the 2 chapters that gave too much information between him and his wife and a maiden. It also contained some history of how author as he writes the story. ( )
  birdsmath | Jan 20, 2013 |
Nothing of much interest here. ( )
  EctopicBrain | Dec 4, 2012 |
Showing 1-5 of 36 (next | show all)
Patterson doesn’t buy that Tut died of a infection. And that’s all fine and good, but he does nothing other to follow his gut to come up with abruptly fingering likely murder suspects. There is no true evidence; just supposition. Dare you question him? Writes Patterson, “There was that gut instinct of mine again — the reason, I think, that TIME magazine had once called me ‘The Man Who Can’t Miss.’”

That level of arrogance is astounding, especially when Patterson lays out his theory and writes, “Case closed.”

Um, no. For one thing, other authors have beat him to this conclusion and with far more credibility — see Michael R. King and Gregory M. Cooper’s WHO KILLED KING TUT? and Bob Brier’s THE MURDER OF TUTANKHAMUN, from 2006 and 1999, respectively — so his hunch that Tut was the victim of homicide is nothing new, nor those he accuses of it. He’s just found a way to turn it into a surefire hit to pay for that golf membership.
 

» Add other authors

Author nameRoleType of authorWork?Status
James Pattersonprimary authorall editionsconfirmed
Dugard, Martinsecondary authorall editionsconfirmed
You must log in to edit Common Knowledge data.
For more help see the Common Knowledge help page.
Series (with order)
Canonical title
Original title
Alternative titles
Original publication date
People/Characters
Important places
Important events
Related movies
Awards and honors
Epigraph
Dedication
For Frank Nicolo - JP
For Callie - MD
First words
It was New Year's Eve as a somber, good-looking explorer named Howard Carter, speaking fluent Arabic, gave the order to begin digging.
Quotations
Last words
(Click to show. Warning: May contain spoilers.)
Disambiguation notice
Publisher's editors
Blurbers
Publisher series

References to this work on external resources.

Wikipedia in English (1)

Book description
Read The Murder of King Tut (11/2009) with book club and I wasn't impressed with the author (James Patterson) like everyone else is. However, others who really liked his former books said this book was not his typical style and that I should try another one before I totally porhibit his books from my reading lists. This book just didn't have much going for it except the Egyptian history and part of his conclusion was unfounded and from left field and made me question the time I spend to read this book.
Since 1922, when Howard Carter discovered Tut's 3,000-year-old tomb, most Egyptologists have presumed that the young king died of disease, or perhaps an accident, such as a chariot fall.

But what if his fate was actually much more sinister?

Now, in THE MURDER OF TUT, James Patterson and Martin Dugard chronicle their epic quest to find out what happened to the boy-king. They comb through the evidence--X-rays, Carter's files, forensic clues--and scavenge for overlooked data to piece together the details of his life and death. The result is a true crime tale of intrigue, betrayal, and usurpation that presents a compelling case that King Tut's death was anything but natural.
Haiku summary

No descriptions found.

(see all 2 descriptions)

The authors describe their investigation into the death of King Tut, recounting how they drew on forensic clues, historical information, and the writings of Howard Carter to conclude that Tut did not die of natural causes.

(summary from another edition)

» see all 6 descriptions

Quick Links

Swap Ebooks Audio
38 avail.
227 wanted
3 pay6 pay

Popular covers

Rating

Average: (3.06)
0.5 6
1 13
1.5 1
2 14
2.5 12
3 33
3.5 7
4 30
4.5 2
5 17

Audible.com

An edition of this book was published by Audible.com.

See editions

Is this you?

Become a LibraryThing Author.

 

Help/FAQs | About | Privacy/Terms | Blog | Contact | LibraryThing.com | APIs | WikiThing | Common Knowledge | Legacy Libraries | 81,956,132 books!