

|
Loading... Unscientific Americaby Chris Mooney
None.
"Yes, the latest findings on climate change and other areas of science need to be heard on Capitol Hill and in the media. But so does sound reasoning about America's absurd prison policy or the country's counterproductive efforts to combat drug use. … The problem here is not with public engagement in science - it is with public engagement." This lack of data is the book’s main problem. For a book advocating science literacy, it offers surprisingly little evidence to support its claims. Yes, lots of facts and figures are thrown about—there are 65 pages of footnotes—but none of them strongly buttresses the three primary claims of the book: first, that the dire problem of scientific illiteracy in this country is holding America back; second, that a main cause of this problem is the failure of scientists to communicate their trade but their simultaneous success in communicating their atheism; and third, that the authors’ solutions to the problem of scientific illiteracy are better than many others. Indeed, the statistics on science illiteracy, which show that it hasn’t changed much in thirty years, count against the author’s thesis that it is not only a growing problem but one that was once palpably improved by science popularizers but is now exacerbated by atheists. Finally, Unscientific America is marred by its tone of preachiness, in which the authors repeatedly, and annoyingly, give the impression that they alone know the true solution, and if we would just listen to them everything will be fine. This would be an acceptable conclusion if they gave data supporting their contentions, but they don’t, and so we’re left weighing opinions rather than facts. In the end, Unscientific America is a frame around a big fat empty space.
References to this work on external resources.
|
Google Books — Loading...RatingAverage: (3.48)
Is this you?Become a LibraryThing Author. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
However, one of my problems with the authors' argument is that they point to efforts like ScienceDebate2008 as a way forward. But if you can't recall ScienceDebate2008 from the presidential election, there's a reason for it, and it doesn't bode well if that's the future.
So maybe motivational/ inspirational. Maybe junk. But:
Recommended. For thinking people of all professions ;-P 4 stars. (