

|
Loading... Ulysses (original 1922; edition 1993)by James Joyce
Work detailsUlysses by James Joyce (1922)
James Joyce is obviously an incredibly talented writer, but his style is too difficult for me. There were passages that I enjoyed but on the whole this book was more of a chore than a joy. 5 stars because its a work of genius, so everyone says. 4 stars because it has so many deep literary and classical references that to say one understood the book, is like saying one is very well educated. 3 stars because the words, strung together in a stream-of-consciousness mellifluous, onomatopoeic way, read just beautifully. 2 stars because it was boring as hell. I just couldn't care less about the characters, I just wanted them to get on with whatever they were doing and have Joyce interfere in their lives with his references, his poetry, and his mellifluous whathavewehere considerably less. 1 star because I had to give it up. It got wet when I dropped it in the bath and the pages stuck together when I dried it out. Since it wasn't exactly cheap to start with and there wasn't another copy in the island bookshop (mine), I had no choice but to give it up. . . . . . . . . Or at least that's my story and I'm sticking to it. . . . . . . . . . . . Or it would have been if I hadn't had the audio book. Reviewed 28 May, 2011 Ahhhhhhh fuck this book. I will return to you when I'm more educated or masochistic. I made it to page 250! So that's...like, I'd be done, if this was Finnegan's Wake! Free at last! Free at last! Thank God Almighty, I am free at last! This review will be all over the place, as I have so many conflicting thoughts regarding this book. While I did love certain sections, they just could not make up for the fact that the rest of the book was simply a form of literary torture. I don't think I've ever had such a roller coaster ride of a reading experience before. Joyce managed to make me laugh out loud one second, and the next I was sitting on my hands so as not to gouge out my own eyes. Am I glad that I read it? Absolutely. Will I read it again? Hell no. I found Recovering Your Story: Proust, Joyce, Woolf, Faulkner, Morrison by Brown professor Arnold Weinstein to be an immense help while reading Ulysses. Honestly when I first started reading it, I was very cynical. Whenever I would hear people talk about how amazing Ulysses was, my brain always translated it into "I have no idea what the hell he's saying, so it must be brilliant!" But the author of this guide really opened my eyes. After reading certain explanations or interpretations of his, I found myself thinking "damn, that Joyce is a clever bastard". Through Weinstein's observations I also learned the best way (for me) to read the stream of consciousness chapters - which surprisingly have turned out to be my favorite. I've found that I love Bloom as a character (maybe it's the underdog thing) and I absolutely love being inside his head. My favorite episode was Hades, followed by The Wandering Rocks, Nausicaa, Penelope, and the first half of Circe (that one just went on way too long and it ceased to be amusing). Unfortunately, none of that was enough to make me actually enjoy this experience. And as much as I loved the final page, it was a bit anti- climactic - I felt like Queen's "We Are the Champions" should have been playing in the background as I closed the book (forever). Or at least the "We Did It!" song from Dora the Explorer.
A few intuitive, sensitive visionaries may understand and comprehend "Ulysses," James Joyce's new and mammoth volume, without going through a course of training or instruction, but the average intelligent reader will glean little or nothing from it- even from careful perusal, one might properly say study, of it- save bewilderment and a sense of disgust. It should be companioned with a key and a glossary like the Berlitz books. Then the attentive and diligent reader would eventually get some comprehension of Mr. Joyce's message. For readers to whom books are an important means of learning about life, it stands preeminent above modern rivals as one of the most monumental works of the human intelligence. During the one exciting day in Dublin, Joyce turns the mind of Bloom inside out. The history of Ireland comes to us in refracted rays. Through Stephen Dedalus we are introduced to Joyce's own profound spiritual uneasiness, his sense of loss, his hatred of the pragmatic commercial ethic, his need for the moorings and soundings of the medieval Catholic synthesis, his mental honesty that won't permit him to accept a religion, no matter what its appeal, so long as his intelligence tells him it is a figment of dream. Is contained inDubliners, A portrait Of The Young Artist, Ulysses (Three Acclaimed Classics In One Volume) by James Joyce Werke, 7 Bde. in 9 Tl.-Bdn., Ln, Bd.4/2, Gesammelte Gedichte by James Joyce Has the (non-series) sequelHas the adaptationWas inspired byThe Odyssey by Homer InspiredHas as a reference guide/companionUlysses Annotated by Don Gifford The Bloomsday Book by Harry Blamires Ulysses Unbound: A Reader's Companion to James Joyce's Ulysses by Terence Killeen Le osterie di Dublino: la cucina irlandese di James Joyce by Andrea Maia Has as a studyHas as a student's study guide
References to this work on external resources.
|
Google Books — Loading...
Popular coversRatingAverage: (4.07)
![]() Audible.comTwelve editions of this book were published by Audible.com.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It is a fascinating, frustrating, not entirely enjoyable read. There are moments of stunning beauty, humor, shock, severe boredom, and opacity. In it's minutely detailed description of a single day in 1904 Dublin it attempts to contain all of human experience and more, and, perhaps purposefully, demonstrates the futility of depicting human experience. I am not sure if I liked this book, but if I could only have two books with me on a desert island, this would be the second book. (